Hello Daniel,
> > According to the documentation, this is a valid way of specifying the
> > licence.
>
> re formatting: you're right. however, I think the specification is
> generally interpreted in the way that when you have multiple file
> blocks, you'd use (multiple) distinct license blocks. y
Hi David
On 7/25/21 11:04 AM, David Bürgin wrote:
> For all of your items I will comment ‘I did it just like in opendkim and
> opendmarc’, but let’s go through them.
:)
> According to the documentation, this is a valid way of specifying the
> licence.
re formatting: you're right. however, I thi
Hello Daniel,
thank you very much for the review.
For all of your items I will comment ‘I did it just like in opendkim and
opendmarc’, but let’s go through them.
> * debian/copyright:
> The upstream contact should not be a name only, but a means of
> contact, such as an email address.
3 matches
Mail list logo
