On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 11:46 AM Steffen Möller wrote:
> I had a look and like the device. Conceptionally, it would be very
> interesting to learn if you can build the firmware for the Spartan-3
> also with Debian. It should be possible with Yosys. I do not mean that
> you need to Open Source your
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 10:39 AM Tobias Frost wrote:
> this seems to be a quite specific software for some quite specific evaluation
> board…
The chip seems like something useful for scientists and others dealing
with high speed analog signals. Looks like both the board and the
chips themselves ca
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Hello Debian,
I've prepared the packaging of recastnavigation. It is lintian clean
and tested with pbuilder. Further information about this package can
be accessed from the URL :
https://salsa.debian.org/games-team/recastnavigation
it's been put i
Hi Thomas,
just a short observation; it seems to apply to at least a few of your new
pacakges:
- You need have "ITP" bugs for your new packages [1];
- and close them in the d/changelog.
- The RFS bug are not closed via d/changelog.
(Did not have time for an deeper look at the package)
[1] mor
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Dave,
I've reviewed the package on mentors; it needs some work:
- the patch "docs and build tweaks":
- The Bug-Debian should point to a bug _covering_ the patch, not the ITP.
(IOW, remove that line from the dep3 patch header)
- Maybe that patch should be sent
On 16.05.2021 17:30, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Sun, May 16, 2021 at 05:25:19PM +0200, Gürkan Myczko wrote:
On 15.05.2021 21:58, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 11:58:08AM +0200, Gürkan Myczko wrote:
> > * Package name: sfxr-qt
> It builds, but on trying to start:
during my
Heya,
you may want to get in touch with https://salsa.debian.org/electronics-team.
I had a look and like the device. Conceptionally, it would be very
interesting to learn if you can build the firmware for the Spartan-3
also with Debian. It should be possible with Yosys. I do not mean that
you n
On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 01:36:29PM +0200, Gürkan Myczko wrote:
>
> The power as in maintaining the software source package? Or the power to run
> buildds using resources to build the binaries? Or both or something else?
> That is true, and I'm willing to the software source debian packaging part.
On 01.06.2021 13:19, Tobias Frost wrote:
Hi Gürkan,
On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 01:05:49PM +0200, Gürkan Myczko wrote:
Hi Tobias,
> this seems to be a quite specific software for some quite specific
> evaluation
> board…
Indeed the software is only useful with this hardware:
https://www.radec.ch/
Hi Gürkan,
On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 01:05:49PM +0200, Gürkan Myczko wrote:
> Hi Tobias,
>
> > this seems to be a quite specific software for some quite specific
> > evaluation
> > board…
>
> Indeed the software is only useful with this hardware:
> https://www.radec.ch/shop
>
> > It seems a bit o
Hi Tobias,
this seems to be a quite specific software for some quite specific
evaluation
board…
Indeed the software is only useful with this hardware:
https://www.radec.ch/shop
It seems a bit out-of-scope for Debian to carry such specialized
software?
I would disagree, if people can buy t
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
I guess this RFS is waiting for an updated package.
Once available, please remove the moreinfo tag.
--
tobi
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Gürkan,
I've saw the rejcect from the FTP masters in #930923#12
However, those changes to d/copyright seem not to be in the package on mentors.
(this is a blocker)
I'm also seeing some strang dangling symlinks in debian/;
I guess you should review the package before
Hi Gürkan,
this seems to be a quite specific software for some quite specific evaluation
board…
It seems a bit out-of-scope for Debian to carry such specialized software?
I might be really wrong, so maybe elaborate a bit why you think this software
should be in Debian?
--
Cheers,
tobi
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
FTBFS due to missing gftools (its ITP is #975676):
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy : Depends: gftools which is a virtual package
> and is not provided by any available package
>
> Unable to resolve dependencies! Giving
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Nick
let me follow up. Base of this review is this dsc file:
9a88dec1dfb2f225e8a4d07d205e357aaab926d55b302349c1cda328ddb33fc6 vguitar_2.8-
1.dsc
(Please consider using mentors.debian.net to provide the package, as it has some
nice features that helps in the sponsor
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Fabrice,
I've took an look at that group of awf-gtk[234] package and notice that they
all build from the same source.
Therefore it should be the goal to only have one source package and compile the
flavours from the same source;
debhelper principally support it to
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
as package is broken:
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 00:42:06 +0100 Adam Borowski wrote:
> autopkgtest [00:34:21]: test autodep8-python3: [---
> Testing with python3.8:
> Traceback (most recent call last):
(...)
> File "", line 1, in
> File "/usr/lib/python
Hi Kyle,
Is there still something to sponsor?
would you mind to upload the package to mentors.debian.net?
(I and many other sponsors prefer taking them from there, not from a git
instance)
(This is also true for your other open RFSs)
Cheers,
tobi
19 matches
Mail list logo
