Re: Question about writing systemd unit for old package

On 20/05/21 1:59 pm, Alec Leamas wrote: Hi, On 20/05/2021 03:35, Paul Wise wrote: On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 8:51 AM Richard Hector wrote: Does that not depend on whether it does anything before dropping privileges? For example, a webserver can bind to low ports before dropping privilege. I imag

Re: Resolve circular dependency of a Python package

On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 07:32:53AM +0200, Jan Gru wrote: > Those are de-facto runtime dependencies, but ~pcodedmp~ is required by > ~oletools~ to run the `python setup.py tests` during the build of oletools, > so it is kind of a build dependency, too. I assume disabling those tests > selectively, w

Bug#988923: RFS: distorm3/3.5.2b-1 -- powerful disassembler library for x86/AMD64 binary streams (Python3 bindings)

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the orphaned package "distorm3": * Package name: distorm3 Version : 3.5.2b-1 Upstream Author : Gil Dabah * URL : https://github.com/gdabah/distorm * License : BSD

Re: (No Subject)

On 2021-05-21 8:25 a.m., Hunter Wittenborn wrote: >> I'm asking myself how many package are only available in Arch and not > in Debian. > > Support for Arch Linux packages on Debian was a byproduct of makedeb, > but the main goal is to just provide an alternative to the Debian source > package

Bug#988608: RFS: scrollz/2.2.3-2 - advanced ircII-based IRC client

On Sun, May 16, 2021 at 02:55:32PM -0600, Mike Markley wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > I'm seeking assistance uploading a new version of the ScrollZ IRC client > to unstable that addresses an outstanding CVE: > https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-293

Re: (No Subject)

> I'm asking myself how many package are only available in Arch and not in >Debian. Support for Arch Linux packages on Debian was a byproduct of makedeb, but the main goal is to just provide an alternative to the Debian source package format. On the topic of Arch Linux though, makedeb (and

Re: (No Subject)

On 2021-05-21 at 07:44, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote: > Hi, > > On 2021-05-21 7:30 a.m., Hunter Wittenborn wrote: > >>> If you want to get makedeb into Debian, then you'll need to >>> build a Debian source package for it. >>> If on the other hand you want to get the packages created by

Re: (No Subject)

Hi, On 2021-05-21 7:30 a.m., Hunter Wittenborn wrote: > > If you want to get makedeb into Debian, then you'll need to build > a Debian source package for it. > > If on the other hand you want to get the packages created by > makedeb into Debian, you're probably out of luck. > > T

Re: (No Subject)

> If you want to get makedeb into Debian, then you'll need to build a Debian > source package for it. > If on the other hand you want to get the packages created by makedeb into >Debian, you're probably out of luck. > The complete build system is based on a .dsc file and this does more than

Re: (No Subject)

Hi ! On 2021-05-21 5:43 a.m., Hunter Wittenborn wrote: > I'm continuing to look around at things - do all packages, even those in > non-free, have to have an accompanying .dsc file to be in the Debian > repositories? > The complete build system is based on a .dsc file and this does more than onl

Re: (No Subject)

Hi ! On 2021-05-21 5:43 a.m., Hunter Wittenborn wrote: > I'm continuing to look around at things - do all packages, even those in > non-free, have to have an accompanying .dsc file to be in the Debian > repositories? > Like I already wrote, there's much to read before your package get submitted

Bug#988466: RFS: aspell-sl/0.60-5 -- Slovenian dictionary for GNU Aspell

On 21. 05. 21 03:17, Paul Wise wrote: > * At this point in the freeze, the release team asks for folks to >upload new upstream releases and other changes not targeted at >bullseye to be uploaded to experimental instead of unstable. > - https://release.debian.org/bullseye/freeze_policy.h

Re: (No Subject)

On 2021-05-21 at 05:40, Hunter Wittenborn wrote: > > >> If yes, then try to build it from its source. Then it can be >> published in main > > > > >> Why are you putting the package in non-free ? > >> What license did you put your s

Re: (No Subject)

I'm continuing to look around at things - do all packages, even those in non-free, have to have an accompanying .dsc file to be in the Debian repositories?

(No Subject)

> If yes, then try to build it from its source. Then it can be published in main > Why are you putting the package in non-free ? > What license did you put your software under ? makedeb is licensed under the GPL3 license. The

Re: Question with packaging for non-free

Hello Hunter Am 21.05.21 um 08:51 schrieb Hunter Wittenborn: > Hello, > > I've recently been working on a project called > https://github.com/hwittenborn/makedeb that converts Arch Linux > packages into Debian packages. More specifically, it takes the Arch > Linux build format, PKGBUILDs, and use

Re: Question with packaging for non-free

Hi! On 2021-05-21 2:51 a.m., Hunter Wittenborn wrote: > Hello, > > I've recently been working on a project called makedeb >  that converts Arch Linux > packages into Debian packages. More specifically, it takes the Arch > Linux build format, PKGBUILDs, and

Re: Question with packaging for non-free

Hi, On 2021-05-21 2:51 a.m., Hunter Wittenborn wrote: > Hello, > > I've recently been working on a project called makedeb >  that converts Arch Linux > packages into Debian packages. More specifically, it takes the Arch > Linux build format, PKGBUILDs, and

Bug#988466: RFS: aspell-sl/0.60-5 -- Slovenian dictionary for GNU Aspell

On Fri, 2021-05-21 at 08:27 +0200, Tomaž Šolc wrote: > Should I wait with this package until Bullseye is released? Yes, or upload to experimental now and unstable after the release. > If you think it makes more sense, I can simply drop it from the binary > package. I think it makes sense to lea

Question with packaging for non-free

Hello, I've recently been working on a project called https://github.com/hwittenborn/makedeb that converts Arch Linux packages into Debian packages. More specifically, it takes the Arch Linux build format, PKGBUILDs, and uses them to make Debian packages. As of recent, I've been wanting to