Bug#971594: RFS: asciidoc/9.0.2-1 [ITA] -- Highly configurable text format for writing documentation

On Sat, 2020-10-03 at 10:11 +0200, Leon Marz wrote: > Ok, no problem. asciidoc-base is now a metapackage, which depends on > asciidoc. Please also file a bug on nanoc so that you can eventually drop the asciidoc-base transitional package. I also suggest removing the suggests/recommends from asc

Bug#971634: RFS: btrfsmaintenance/0.5-1 -- automate btrfs maintenance tasks on mountpoints or directories

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors and Sven, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "btrfsmaintenance": * Package name: btrfsmaintenance Version : 0.5-1 Upstream Author : David Sterba * URL : https://github.com/kdave/btrfsmaintenance

Bug#971594: RFS: asciidoc/9.0.2-1 [ITA] -- Highly configurable text format for writing documentation

> I would instead suggest either keeping it as it was before, getting > nanoc fixed before removing asciidoc-base or making asciidoc-base into > a transitional package depending on asciidoc. Ok, no problem. asciidoc-base is now a metapackage, which depends on asciidoc. - Leon