Bug#958991: RFS: setzer/0.2.4-1 [ITP] -- simple yet full-featured LaTeX editor

Hi, Quick comment: at least files under data/resources/gtksourceview/language- specs has different license information than what currently written in debian/copyright. Please review copyright information again. -- Best, Boyuan Yang 在 2020-04-27星期一的 18:13 +，Stephan Lachnit写道： > Package: spon

Bug#959014: RFS: filezilla/3.39.0-2+deb10u1 [NMU, RC] -- Full-featured graphical FTP/FTPS/SFTP client

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "filezilla". * Package name: filezilla Version : 3.39.0-2+deb10u1 Upstream Author : Tim Kosse * URL : https://filezilla-project.org/ * License : GPL

Bug#959013: RFS: gnome-maps/3.30.3.1-0+deb10u1 [NMU] -- map application for GNOME

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnome-maps" * Package name: gnome-maps Version : 3.30.3.1-0+deb10u1 Upstream Author : maps-l...@gnome.org * URL : https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Maps * License

Bug#959011: RFS: rumur/2020.04.26-1 -- model checker for the Murphi language

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "rumur" * Package name: rumur Version : 2020.04.26-1 Upstream Author : Matthew Fernandez * URL : https://github.com/Smattr/rumur * License : Unlicense * V

Bug#956395: marked as done (RFS: openscap/1.2.17-0.1 [NMU, RC] -- Set of libraries enabling integration of the SCAP line of standards)

Your message dated Mon, 27 Apr 2020 21:35:22 -0400 with message-id <8729f96418e6b5728844b1e94ec43c001b2a2069.ca...@debian.org> and subject line Re: RFS: openscap/1.2.17-0.1 [NMU, RC] -- Set of libraries enabling integration of the SCAP line of standards has caused the Debian Bug report #956395, re

Bug#959001: RFS: vzdump/1.2.6-6 [QA] -- OpenVZ backup scripts

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "vzdump" * Package name: vzdump Version : 1.2.6-6 Upstream Author : Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH * URL : http://www.proxmox.com/cms_proxmox/en/virtualization/o

Bug#958432: marked as done (RFS: libgadu/1:1.12.2-5 [QA] -- Gadu-Gadu protocol library)

Your message dated Mon, 27 Apr 2020 23:19:36 +0200 with message-id <20200427211936.ga29...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#958432: RFS: libgadu/1:1.12.2-5 [QA] -- Gadu-Gadu protocol library has caused the Debian Bug report #958432, regarding RFS: libgadu/1:1.12.2-5 [QA] -- Gadu-Gadu protocol

Bug#958991: RFS: setzer/0.2.4-1 [ITP] -- simple yet full-featured LaTeX editor

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "setzer" Package name: setzer Version : 0.2.4-1 Upstream Author : cvfosa URL : https://www.cvfosa.org/setzer/ Lice

Bug#951202: RFS review of cglm 0.7.1-1

Hi Leon, Jordan did detect something was wrong with the doc. Indeed, there's some issues. It's overall a good review, though missing some advice, which I intend to give myself here. 1/ Sphinx documentation Your package must be using: --with sphinxdoc and the -doc package must depends on ${sphi

Bug#951202: RFS review of cglm 0.7.1-1

Leon, I reviewed the 0.7.1-1 packaging you posted on mentors.debian.net. I didn't see any major issues, but maybe some suggestions. The license is MIT, and debian/copyright has it listed properly. I think packages often will call out the debian directory in debian/copyright, even if it matches t