Re: Packaging repository using both upstream-as-git and tarballs / branch name conflicts

2019-07-13 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sat, Jul 13, 2019 at 02:41:18PM +0100, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: > (b) How do I deal with branch/tag name conflicts between upstream and > packaging? They shouldn't happen. > There are at least two ways conflicts can happen by accident: > > (i) gbp defaults to naming the packaging branch 'mast

Bug#932004: RFS: uriparser/0.9.3-1

2019-07-13 Thread Jörg Frings-Fürst
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "uriparser" Package name: uriparser Version : 0.9.3-1 Upstream Author : Sebastian Pipping URL : https://github.com/uriparser/uriparser License

Packaging repository using both upstream-as-git and tarballs / branch name conflicts

2019-07-13 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
(a) The git-buildpackage manual [0] mentions, and [1] further discusses, a workflow that imports *both* upstream's git and upstream's tarball of the same release: upstream-vcsuUuuUu \ \ upstream-for-gbp --i--

Bug#931989: RFS: desktopfolder/1.1.0-1

2019-07-13 Thread David Mohammed
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "desktopfolder" * Package name: desktopfolder Version : 1.1.0-1 Upstream Author : José Amuedo Salmerón joseamu...@gmail.com * URL : https://github.com/sphera

Bug#931942: marked as done (RFS: libonig/6.9.2-1)

2019-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 13 Jul 2019 12:19:46 +0200 with message-id <20190713101946.ga20...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#931942: RFS: libonig/6.9.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #931942, regarding RFS: libonig/6.9.2-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#931960: RFS: jool/4.0.2-1 [ITP] -- IP/ICMP Translators

2019-07-13 Thread Vincent Bernat
❦ 12 juillet 2019 18:48 -05, Alberto Leiva Popper : > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "jool" I have posted a review in #883393 (before seeing this RFS). -- Debian package sponsoring guidelines: https://vincent.bernat.ch/en/debian-package-sponsoring signature.asc Description: PGP si

Bug#931814: RFS: daggy/1.1.2-1 [ITP]

2019-07-13 Thread Михаил Миловидов
Differences from multiplexers: 1. Daggy can run commands on localhost without ssh 2. Daggy can run different sets of commands on different sets servers (taktuk, for example, can run only one command on set of servers) 3. Daggy has human readable config. For example - https://github.com/synacker/dag

Bug#931814: RFS: daggy/1.1.2-1 [ITP]

2019-07-13 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
[2019-07-10 22:17] Михаил Миловидов > > part 2 text/plain1010 > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "daggy": > > * Package name : daggy > Version : 1.1.2-1 > Upstream Author

Bug#931972: Bug#930637: unblock: monit/1:5.25.2-3+deb10u1

2019-07-13 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 7/13/19 8:25 AM, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote: > On Sun, 7 Jul 2019 08:29:08 +0200 Sebastiaan Couwenberg > wrote: >> Please upload a new revision to unstable with source-only changes... > > Backport for Buster: > https://mentors.debian.net/package/monit > Please sponsor this package. I will spon