Bug#925505: marked as done (RFS: dhcpoptinj/0.4.4-1 [ITP] -- DHCP option injector)

2019-04-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:04:47 +0200 with message-id <20190409220447.ga17...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#925505: RFS: dhcpoptinj/0.4.4-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #925505, regarding RFS: dhcpoptinj/0.4.4-1 [ITP] -- DHCP option injector to be marked as done. This

Re: no response Fwd: Bug#905080: O: as31 - Intel 8031/8051 assembler

2019-04-09 Thread Andrej Shadura
Albert, On Tue, 9 Apr 2019, 19:05 Albert van der Horst, wrote: > I followed up on a "orphaned bug" by adding a message to the bug 905080. > This got never a response. Did I make a mistake with respect to the > Debian protocols? > I seem to remember that I got a confirmation that in "due course"

Re: no response Fwd: Bug#905080: O: as31 - Intel 8031/8051 assembler

2019-04-09 Thread Jason Crain
On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 07:05:29PM +0200, Albert van der Horst wrote: > I followed up on a "orphaned bug" by adding a message to the bug 905080. > This got never a response. Did I make a mistake with respect to the > Debian protocols? > I seem to remember that I got a confirmation that in "due cour

O to ITA WAS: no response

2019-04-09 Thread Geert Stappers
On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 07:05:29PM +0200, Albert van der Horst wrote: > I followed up on a "orphaned bug" by adding a message to the bug 905080. > This got never a response. Sadly that does happen. Good that you presist. ( How to do good presistence is another story ) > Did I make a mistake wit

Bug#926731: ITS: urlscan/0.9.2 - extract and browse email URLs

2019-04-09 Thread Boruch Baum
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the existing debian package "urlscan[1]", used by email clients such as mutt to parse and pipe embedded urls. The debian package is an update and improvement to another debian package "urlview", but[2]

no response Fwd: Bug#905080: O: as31 - Intel 8031/8051 assembler

2019-04-09 Thread Albert van der Horst
I followed up on a "orphaned bug" by adding a message to the bug 905080. This got never a response. Did I make a mistake with respect to the Debian protocols? I seem to remember that I got a confirmation that in "due course" a Debianist would respond. And no, the 8051 is not dead by a long stret

Bug#926715: RFS: ddupdate/0.6.2-1

2019-04-09 Thread Alec Leamas
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ddupdate" * Package name: ddupdate Version : 0.6.2-1 Upstream Author : Alec Leamas * URL : https://github.com/leamas/ddupdate * License : Expat Sect

Re: new maintainer for package 'urlscan'

2019-04-09 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Monday, 8 April 2019 15:21:48 CEST Boruch Baum wrote: > Package 'urlscan'[1] in debian is ten point releases and over three > years behind the developer's latest release[2], the listed debian As urlscan is a python script, you may want to reach out to Python packaging team. The Python page in