Help to build libsmithwaterman with gcc-8 needed

2018-08-04 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, I thinks I've fixed the issue for bug #897797 in Git[1] for libsmithwaterman but somehow it fails to build for a different reason now. Any idea why this might happen: ... make all-am make[2]: Entering directory '/build/libsmithwaterman-0.0+git20160702.2610e25' g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.

Bug#905375: RFS: bitz-server/2.0.1-1

2018-08-04 Thread Jörg Frings-Fürst
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi Herbert, Am Samstag, den 04.08.2018, 09:05 -0300 schrieb Herbert Fortes: > Hi, > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA512 > > > > retitle 905375 RFS: bitz-server/2.0.1-1 > > thanks > > > > I ran 'blhc --all ../*.build and

Bug#905455: RFS: dmidecode/3.1-2

2018-08-04 Thread Jörg Frings-Fürst
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dmidecode" Package name: dmidecode Version : 3.1-2 Upstream Author : dmidecode-de...@nongnu.org URL : htt

Bug#905053: RFS: trojan/1.5.1-1 [ITP]

2018-08-04 Thread GreaterFire
Dear mentors, The upstream has been updated to 1.5.2, so I updated the package accordingly. Get the newer package by: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/trojan/trojan_1.5.2-1.dsc Thanks, GreaterFire

Bug#905428: marked as done (RFS: shotwell/0.28.4-1)

2018-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 4 Aug 2018 18:43:02 +0200 with message-id <20180804164302.42oy6n5f3sbzc...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#905428: RFS: shotwell/0.28.4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #905428, regarding RFS: shotwell/0.28.4-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#880991: marked as done (RFS: chapel-1.16/1.16.0-1 [ITP])

2018-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 04 Aug 2018 16:20:17 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: chapel-1.16/1.16.0-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #880991, regarding RFS: chapel-1.16/1.16.0-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#905428: RFS: shotwell/0.28.4-1

2018-08-04 Thread Jörg Frings-Fürst
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "shotwell" Package name: shotwell Version : 0.28.4-1 Upstream Author :

Bug#905375: RFS: bitz-server/2.0.1-1

2018-08-04 Thread Herbert Fortes
Hi, > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > retitle 905375 RFS: bitz-server/2.0.1-1 > thanks > I ran 'blhc --all ../*.build and there are some CXXFLAGS missing (-fPIE) LDFLAGS missing (-fPIE -pie) I saw debian/rules has 'hardening=+all' but can you please add: export DEB_CXXFL

Re: bison help needed

2018-08-04 Thread Dan Kegel
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 10:43 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: >> +export DEB_CXXFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND=-fpermissive > > I tried this but the error remains exactly the same. Right, but looking into it, I got the feeling that the error message was somewhat inaccurate, and the compiler was unhappy about some re

Bug#905398: marked as done (RFS: wolfssl/3.15.3+dfsg-2 [RC])

2018-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 04 Aug 2018 10:20:09 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: wolfssl/3.15.3+dfsg-2 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #905398, regarding RFS: wolfssl/3.15.3+dfsg-2 [RC] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If