Hi,
I'm a bit desperate to find out how the Debian project maintains its patches
w.r.t. upstream repositories. Thus, while I can explore the _current_ patches
of a package by looking at the "*.debian.tar.gz"-archive after obtaining its
sources through "apt-get source ", I'd be rather intereste
On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 6:01 PM, Luke Diamand wrote:
> I'm obviously doing something terribly wrong, but I have no idea what.
I don't think you did anything wrong.
> Can someone tell me the correct process for getting a bug fix in?
Exactly what you did so far.
I think the problem here is that
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "olivetti-mode"
Dear Jonathan,
I've CCed you because you sponsored the last upload of olivetti-mode.
If you're satisfied with the quality of my work would you please
consider granting DM uploa
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "khronos-api"
* Package name: khronos-api
Version : 4.6+git20180514-1~bpo9+1
Upstream Author : The Khronos Group Inc.
* URL : https://www.opengl.org/registry
*
On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 08:58:23PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> tags 900214 + pending
> thanks
>
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "elpy"
>
> Uploaded. :P)
Thank you! :-D
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi Chris,
On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 09:01:37PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Hi Nicholas,
>
> > OTTO documentation
>
> (Hm?)
It seems the abbreviation for "on the topic of" isn't as common as I
had thought!
> > I'm thinking about a mini-project that could save a lot of people time and
> > that migh
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2018 22:23:46 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: tup/0.7.6-1 ITP
has caused the Debian Bug report #899174,
regarding RFS: tup/0.7.6-1 ITP
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Hi!
A few years ago, in 2014, I submitted a bug fix for the git package to
add git-p4:
It's here:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=773245
It seems to have just been forgotten and so far my attempts to get it
unforgotten have failed.
I'm obviously doing something terribly wrong
Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2018 11:57:32 +0200
with message-id <20180528095732.rjrbkhdwbampq...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#900256: RFS: deepin-image-viewer/1.2.22-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #900256,
regarding RFS: deepin-image-viewer/1.2.22-1
to be marked as done.
This means
On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 01:00:11PM +0800, Yanhao Mo wrote:
> * Package name: deepin-menu
>Version : 3.3.4-1
> Changes since the last upload:
> * New upstream release.
Hi!
It looks like you accidentally dropped changes to 3.3.3-1 (the version
currently in unstable). Even though
10 matches
Mail list logo
