Systemd user instance equivalent of dh_systemd_enable?

2018-04-07 Thread Daniele Nicolodi
Hello, I'm working on a package that installs a systemd user instance unit file that needs to be enabled with # systemctl --global enable foo.service Using debhelper, dh_systemd_enable takes care of this automatically for system unit files, but not for user unit files. Is there some other (semi

Bug#895032: marked as done (RFS: deepin-music/3.1.8+ds-1 [ITP])

2018-04-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 7 Apr 2018 22:35:26 +0200 with message-id <20180407203526.7hthace5y7jbk...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#895032: [yanha...@gmail.com: Re: Bug#895032: RFS: deepin-music/3.1.8-1 [ITP]] has caused the Debian Bug report #895032, regarding RFS: deepin-music/3.1.8+ds-1 [IT

Re: C++ and Python package combined

2018-04-07 Thread Alex Mestiashvili
On 04/07/2018 10:43 AM, Nico Schlömer wrote: >> I guess you can set PKG_CONFIG_PATH and others appropriately. > > That sounds like what I got to do. I'm just figuring out which paths I need > exactly. Can I use export in d/rules? > > Cheers, > Nico You can find more examples of d/rules and all o

Bug#895127: RFS: thunarx-python/0.3.0-1 [ITP] -- friendly greeter

2018-04-07 Thread Frank Voorburg
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "thunarx-python" * Package name: thunarx-python Version : 0.3.0-1 Upstream Author : Adam Plumb * URL : http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/bindings/thunarx-python *

Bug#895032: [yanha...@gmail.com: Re: Bug#895032: RFS: deepin-music/3.1.8-1 [ITP]]

2018-04-07 Thread Yanhao Mo
- Forwarded message from Yanhao Mo - Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2018 18:02:33 +0800 From: Yanhao Mo To: Adam Borowski Subject: Re: Bug#895032: RFS: deepin-music/3.1.8-1 [ITP] User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) On Sat 04/07 03:32, Adam Borowski wrote: > Thus, I think it'd be a lot better to, ins

Re: C++ and Python package combined

2018-04-07 Thread Georg Faerber
Hi, On 18-04-07 08:43:57, Nico Schlömer wrote: > > I guess you can set PKG_CONFIG_PATH and others appropriately. > > That sounds like what I got to do. I'm just figuring out which paths I > need exactly. Can I use export in d/rules? Yes, using export in d/rules works as expected. Cheers, Georg

Re: C++ and Python package combined

2018-04-07 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 4:43 PM, Nico Schlömer wrote: > Can I use export in d/rules? I think so yes. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Re: C++ and Python package combined

2018-04-07 Thread Nico Schlömer
> I guess you can set PKG_CONFIG_PATH and others appropriately. That sounds like what I got to do. I'm just figuring out which paths I need exactly. Can I use export in d/rules? Cheers, Nico On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 10:24 AM Paul Wise wrote: > On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 4:04 PM, Nico Schlömer wrote:

Re: C++ and Python package combined

2018-04-07 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 4:04 PM, Nico Schlömer wrote: >> Which software is this? > > FEniCS/Dolfin [1]. (I'm preparing the upcoming release.) Has something changed to prevent the existing dh overrides from working? https://sources.debian.org/src/dolfin/2017.2.0.post0-3/debian/rules > The latter

Re: C++ and Python package combined

2018-04-07 Thread Nico Schlömer
> Which software is this? FEniCS/Dolfin [1]. (I'm preparing the upcoming release.) > Does the upstream build system not take care of each of the steps? Like I said, upstream build instructions are: 1. Build and install the library. (Basically CMake + make install) 2. `cd python` and insta

Re: C++ and Python package combined

2018-04-07 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 10:38 PM, Nico Schlömer wrote: > I would like to package a piece of software Which software is this? > Any hints? Does the upstream build system not take care of each of the steps? -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise