Your message dated Fri, 12 Jan 2018 08:39:04 +0200
with message-id <839e794f-a673-42ce-9dae-b629b99ca...@linux.com>
and subject line Package uploaded
has caused the Debian Bug report #886934,
regarding RFS: pt-websocket/0.2-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
I had some friendly emails with Stefan (git2r upstream) when he started the R
package git2r (as I needed some features in my drat R package) and he
expressed quite some frustration at working with libgit2 as it changed so
much upstream.
I know we collectively really hate embedding copies, but r-c
2018-01-11 15:06 GMT+01:00 Mattia Rizzolo :
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 09:26:23PM +0800, gustavo panizzo wrote:
> > I sent 2 emails to the DD asking its plans for the package
> > and offering to take over the maintenance. To date I have no answer.
> >
> > What can I do?
>
> Sadly, we have no good w
Hi again,
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 08:34:09AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > # Add include paths for git2r
> > -CPPFLAGS="-I. -Ilibgit2/src -Ilibgit2/include -Ilibgit2/deps/http-parser
> > ${CPPFLAGS}"
> > -+CPPFLAGS="-I. -I/usr/include/git2 ${CPPFLAGS}"
> > ++CPPFLAGS="-I. -idirafter /usr/incl
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 09:26:23PM +0800, gustavo panizzo wrote:
> I sent 2 emails to the DD asking its plans for the package
> and offering to take over the maintenance. To date I have no answer.
>
> What can I do?
Sadly, we have no good ways to deal with those cases. Your options are:
1 keep m
Hello
There is a package of my interest maintained by an active (with other
packages) DD, that person is also the upstream maintainer of the
package. I NMU'ed the package in the past and it was recently removed
from testing.
I sent 2 emails to the DD asking its plans for the package
and offering
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: j...@debian.org, pkg-privacy-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsored upload of the package pt-websockets,
maintained by the team pkg-privacy (which I am a member of).
Here is the changelog for the
Your message dated Thu, 11 Jan 2018 11:42:08 +0200
with message-id <422c3cec-22bb-9f5b-4ebf-3ecb71363...@aims.ac.za>
and subject line Done
has caused the Debian Bug report #886834,
regarding RFS: cligh/0.3-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 3:45 PM, Ole Streicher wrote:
> Recently, upstream announced a new version 3.0 of astropy, which
> supports Python 3 only, and I want to have a smooth migration path. I
> thought of a temporary package split: create a new source package
> "astropy" that inherits of the curr
Hi,
I am the maintainer of the "python-astropy" package, that currently
creates packages for both Python 2 and Python 3. Both packages have a
number of reverse dependencies.
Recently, upstream announced a new version 3.0 of astropy, which
supports Python 3 only, and I want to have a smooth migrat
10 matches
Mail list logo
