Hi Tobias,
Renamed the source package and binary package for 'pokemmo-installer', as
mentioned earlier.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=886606
Thanks!
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Carlos Donizete Froes [a.k.a coringao]
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ - https://wiki.debian.org/coringao
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ GPG: 4096R/B638B780
⠈⠳⣄
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pokemmo-installer"
* Package name: pokemmo-installer
Version : 1.4.5-1
Upstream Author : Carlos Donizete Froes
* URL : https://github.com/coringao/pokemmo-
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-ime-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org a...@debian.org
Dear mentors and pkg-ime team members,
I'm looking for a sponsor for package "fcitx" as a team upload into
experimental.
This would initiate a micro-transition around libfcitx-gclie
> Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2018 14:35:50 +0100
> From: Sven Hoexter
> To: Nicholas D Steeves , 886446-d...@bugs.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Bug#886446: RFS: btrfsmaintenance/0.3.1-17-gf7d61e3-1~exp1 [I
> maintain the package]
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15)
>
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 08:33:30PM -05
Hi Chris,
> Why not simply package the game?
Yes! My intention is that in the future this package will be the game (client)
as we release new
versions of the package.
> > (CC'ing chris so that he can share his thoughts.)
>
> All of what you wrote sounds pretty reasonable but will hinge on the
I've retired from sponsoring. Sorry!
--
Jakub Wilk
Hi Tobias,
> I'd substitube "launcher with installer" (as we removed the jar).
> Otherwise it is quite crisp.. I'd ammend only something like
>
> How's about that proposal:
>
> Description: Installer and Launcher for the PokeMMO emulator
> PokeMMO is an emulator of several popular console
> ga
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nautilus-hide"
* Package name: nautilus-hide
Version : 0.2.3-2
Upstream Author : Bruno Nova
* URL : https://github.com/brunonova/nautilus-hide
* License
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nautilus-admin"
* Package name: nautilus-admin
Version : 1.1.2-2
Upstream Author : Bruno Nova
* URL : https://github.com/brunonova/nautilus-admin
* License
Hi Tobias,
> I'm not sure if it enough to remove the term from the short description,
> but if we need to say something that the installer is a installer and
> not the game. To make really clear that there is no connection between
> this package and PokeMMO beside that this will download the inst
Hi Carlos
On Sat, Jan 06, 2018 at 07:54:41PM -0200, Carlos Donizete Froes wrote:
> Hi Tobias,
>
> Sorry to bother again about my package.
no prob
> I do not know if followed the emails that 'Chris Lamb' mentioned about the
> word "Pokemon" in my
> short description in the package.
> "pokemmo
I forgot: the arch specific package needs a Depends on the arch:all
package, which has the wrappers.
On 01/07/2018 05:39 PM, Wookey wrote:
> On 2018-01-07 19:23 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 5:59 PM, Ole Streicher wrote:
>>
>>> If we take Multi-Arch serious, this shouldn't be the case, right?
>>
>> I guess the release team might accept patches to britney for this but
>> I've al
Your message dated Sun, 7 Jan 2018 17:46:43 +0100
with message-id <20180107164642.ga1...@coldtobi.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#883628: ITP: ioport -- direct access to I/O ports from
the command line
has caused the Debian Bug report #883628,
regarding RFS: iopport/1.2-1 [ITP] -- direct access to I/
On 2018-01-07 19:23 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 5:59 PM, Ole Streicher wrote:
>
> > If we take Multi-Arch serious, this shouldn't be the case, right?
>
> I guess the release team might accept patches to britney for this but
> I've also a vague memory that they prefer arches t
Your message dated Sun, 7 Jan 2018 14:35:50 +0100
with message-id <20180107133550.gb31...@timegate.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#886446: RFS: btrfsmaintenance/0.3.1-17-gf7d61e3-1~exp1
[I maintain the package]
has caused the Debian Bug report #886446,
regarding RFS: btrfsmaintenance/0.3.1-17-gf7d61e
Your message dated Sun, 7 Jan 2018 13:40:23 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#884769: RFS: freetype/2.8.1-0.2 [NMU]
has caused the Debian Bug report #884769,
regarding RFS: freetype/2.8.1-0.2 [NMU]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 5:59 PM, Ole Streicher wrote:
> Unfortunately, this is impossible: the assembler code creates a kind of
> sigsetjmp() (with its own calling interface) for Fortran 77. This cannot
> be simply remodelled in C. In principle, one could re-implement this
> with the libunwind libr
Hi Adam and Gianfranco,
Steve accepted almost all of my NMU changes last Friday, when he released a
maintainer version of freetype.
So this RFS bug can be closed.
Thank you for your advice during the process.
Hugh
From: Hugh McMaster
Sent: Friday, 22 Dece
Your message dated Sun, 07 Jan 2018 10:20:18 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: jpcre2/10.31.01-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #856792,
regarding RFS: jpcre2/10.31.01-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Hi Paul,
Paul Wise writes:
> On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 5:43 PM, Ole Streicher wrote:
>> "iraf" exists only on selected architectures due to some required
>> assembler code for each arch and problems with big endian.
> There could be a fallback in C for arches with no assembler yet
> and any non-base
21 matches
Mail list logo
