Please don't update for only a maintainer change, it's kinda a waste
of resource.
--
Regards,
Aron Xu
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-ime-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org yyat...@debian.or.jp
d...@debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for package "fcitx-skk" as an NMU.
This NMU would move package fcitx-skk under pkg-ime team. It has been approved
by
Maybe I'm using an old version that doesn't pick that up? Or I'm not
naming it correctly? Here's the script that I run in an unbuntu docker
image:
https://github.com/AllwineDesigns/build_stlcmd_deb/blob/master/build_stlcmd.sh
( (If you have docker installed you can clone that repo and do a
docker
As requested by Chris Lamb a justification of why the package should
be native was added to the changelog, hence it needs sponsoring again
to be uploaded back to the NEW queue.
Thank you very much,
--
Lazarus
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 06:36:00PM -0700, John Allwine wrote:
> Thanks Adam! I really appreciate you taking the time to look through
> this. I'm still unclear on how to include the .asc file in my upload.
> The dput command takes the .changes file, which determines which files
> are uploaded, so ho
Your message dated Tue, 19 Dec 2017 02:03:22 +0100
with message-id <20171219010322.i5hea3tp5cxn5...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#884651: RFS: stlcmd/1.0-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #884651,
regarding RFS: stlcmd/1.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
> Well, how else can uscan verify it?
> It's also used to verify the orig tarball once it's in the archive.
The watch file describes how to download the upstream tar ball and its
signature file. I'm not sure what to do here. Right now I do a debsign
on the .changes file and it signs the .dsc file a
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 04:00:53PM -0700, John Allwine wrote:
> The signing-key.asc is for uscan when checking for updates in the watch.
> Am I supposed to sign the orig tar ball?
Well, how else can uscan verify it?
It's also used to verify the orig tarball once it's in the archive.
On the other
Thanks Adam!
Ack, I just introduced that help2man issue fixing the lintian warnings about
man pages. Will reorganize a bit to fix that.
The signing-key.asc is for uscan when checking for updates in the watch. Am I
supposed to sign the orig tar ball?
I left it as UNRELEASED as that was suggeste
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pokemmo"
* Package name: pokemmo
Version : 1.4.2-1
Upstream Author : Carlos Donizete Froes
* URL : https://github.com/coringao/pokemmo
* License : G
On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 09:54:10PM -0700, John Allwine wrote:
> * Package name: stlcmd
>Version : 1.0-1
> stlcmd - Suite of commands for generating, inspecting and
> manipulating STL files.
Alas, it fails to build:
/bin/sh: 2: help2man: not found
I also don't see any copyright
Your message dated Mon, 18 Dec 2017 22:25:09 +0100
with message-id <20171218212509.z7blvnrzpgz3y...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#881199: RFS: python-coloredlogs/7.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #881199,
regarding RFS: python-coloredlogs/7.3-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Mon, 18 Dec 2017 21:58:48 +0100
with message-id <20171218205848.ux5z5o7psywdg...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#883751: RFS: deepin-calculator/1.0.1-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #883751,
regarding RFS: deepin-calculator/1.0.1-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This
control: close -1
On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 17:31:27 +0100 Nicolas Braud-Santoni
wrote:
> Control: reopen -1
>
> Upload was rejected (something something non-existing signature file
> referenced
> in .changes); I'm just reopening this so we don't forget about it.
I'm trying harder.
G.
signature.
Control: reopen -1
Upload was rejected (something something non-existing signature file referenced
in .changes); I'm just reopening this so we don't forget about it.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "logrotate"
* Package name: logrotate
Version : 3.13.0-1
Upstream Author : Kamil Dudka
* URL : https://github.com/logrotate/logrotate/
* License : GNU Gener
Your message dated Mon, 18 Dec 2017 11:18:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#884665: RFS: ooniprobe/2.2.0-1.1 [NMU]
has caused the Debian Bug report #884665,
regarding RFS: ooniprobe/2.2.0-1.1 [NMU]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Control: block 884370 by -1
Control: tag 884370 + pending
X-Debbugs-CC: i...@debian.org, j...@debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package “ooniprobe”:
* Package name: ooniprobe
Version : 2.2.0-1.1
* URL
18 matches
Mail list logo
