On 08/28/2017 10:54 PM, Martin Eberhard Schauer wrote:
>>> Well, casting to long helped - but in how far does making
>
>>> abs(unsigned - unsigned)
>
>>> no sense? This does not sound very logical to me.
>
>> The result of (unsigned - unsigned) is unsigned.
> What about A, B both unsigned an
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 10:54:07PM +0200, Martin Eberhard Schauer wrote:
> > > Well, casting to long helped - but in how far does making
>
> > > abs(unsigned - unsigned)
>
> > > no sense? This does not sound very logical to me.
>
> > The result of (unsigned - unsigned) is unsigned.
> What ab
Well, casting to long helped - but in how far does making
abs(unsigned - unsigned)
no sense? This does not sound very logical to me.
The result of (unsigned - unsigned) is unsigned.
What about A, B both unsigned and B > A?
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 10:42:30PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../Bigraph -I../Thirdparty -Wdate-time
> > > -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fopenmp -I/usr//include -I/usr//include/bamtools
> > > -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unknown-pragmas -std=c++98 -O3 -c -o
> > > libutil_a-
Hi James,
On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 02:58:34PM +0100, James Cowgill wrote:
> > g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../Bigraph -I../Thirdparty -Wdate-time
> > -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fopenmp -I/usr//include -I/usr//include/bamtools
> > -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unknown-pragmas -std=c++98 -O3 -c -o
> > libutil
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 06:50:49PM +, Michael P Vageline wrote:
> The firmware and prebuilt binaries are covered under the
>click-to-accept license.
So it's not permitted for Debian to distribute them?
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
The package FTBFS in the current sid chroot. On two attempts I got the
following different errors:
-- Installing:
/<>/debian/tmp/usr/share/kadu/themes/icons/oxygen/protocols/gadu-gadu/32x32/away_d.png
CMake Error at varia/themes/icons/cmake_install.cmake:36 (file):
file INSTALL cannot set perm
On 18.08.2017 at 20:51 +0200, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 08:34:23PM +0200, Mateusz Łukasik wrote:
Changes since the last upload:
* Non-maintainer upload.
* New upstream release.
* Add patch to fix FTBFS with gcc-7. Thanks Fanael Linithien (Closes:
#853470)
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 05:03:02PM +, Michael P Vageline wrote:
> 1. cxlflash depends upon libudev1 and libcxl1 for their runtime shared
> libraries
${shlibs:Depends} already covers that and does the job better.
> 2. The include files were modified, so no copyright update appears to be
> req
Hi,
This upload has the changes pointed by Michael in the previous message
->
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/c/cxlflash/cxlflash_4.3.2533-1.dsc
Thanks,
Rodrigo R. Galvao
hi,
The next RFS update has these chgs:
1. cxlflash depends upon libudev1 and libcxl1 for their runtime shared libraries
2. The include files were modified, so no copyright update appears to be
required
3. the code is changed to use dh_systemd
4. the license files are moved back to /usr/share/
Why does cxlflash explicitly depend on libudev1, libcxl1?
debian/copyright is still not updated.
Why do the maintainer scripts use deb-systemd-helper directly and how does
that work with code aded by dh_systemd_*?
I think the licenses shouldn't be in /usr/share/doc but in
/usr/share/pkgname as they
Hi Andrey,
> > There are a lot of errors in the install_root_man1 target.
> > There are warnings about unused ${perl:Depends}.
>
>
> We've made changes that should fix these errors. Could you check it,
> please? ->
>
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/c/cxlflash/cxlflash_4.3.2528-1
Hi Adam,
I just saw that building on freebsd-i386 failed due to memory exhaustion
during compilation of tests. The only workaround that I can see is to
prevent tests to be compiled if the memory is not enough to compile them.
Do you see any better alternative?
Bests,
Giulio
Il giorno 18/ago/2017
Your message dated Mon, 28 Aug 2017 10:58:13 +0200
with message-id <20170828085813.l3parkcyu5kxv...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#873340: RFS: speedcrunch/0.12.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #873340,
regarding RFS: speedcrunch/0.12.0-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
Le samedi 26 août 2017 à 13:01:57+0200, Gianfranco Costamagna a écrit :
> On Fri, 19 May 2017 11:05:32 + (UTC) Gianfranco Costamagna
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > >* Package the thing with this actual bug, but as far as I'm concerned I
> > > consider it as grave, so I'm not really a fan of
16 matches
Mail list logo
