Bug#871624: RFS: sxiv/1.3.2-2

2017-08-09 Thread Daniel Echeverry
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sxiv" * Package name: sxiv * Version : 1.3.2-2 * Upstream Author : Bert Münnich * URL : https://github.com/muennich/sxiv * License : GPL-2.0+ * Section

Bug#871614: marked as done (RFS: rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar/0.17.4-1)

2017-08-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 Aug 2017 03:03:25 +0200 with message-id <20170810010325.dztfr4bbphnnk...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#871614: RFS: rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar/0.17.4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #871614, regarding RFS: rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar/0.17.4-1

Bug#858531: marked as done (RFS: delight/1.5-1 ITP)

2017-08-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 09 Aug 2017 22:20:18 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: delight/1.5-1 ITP has caused the Debian Bug report #858531, regarding RFS: delight/1.5-1 ITP to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the ca

Bug#871614: RFS: rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar/0.17.4-1

2017-08-09 Thread foss.freedom
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar" * Package name: rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar Version : 0.17.4-1 Upstream Author : David Mohammed * URL : https:

Bug#869692: RFS: cyclograph/1.9.0-1

2017-08-09 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 06:10:05PM +0200, Federico Brega wrote: > > Patch headers should be in the DEP-3 format (lintian tells that). > > Now I have to ask for the option needed for lintian to tell that. It only tells that in the description of tag which is emitted when there is no header at all.

Bug#870909: RFS: cxlflash/4.3.2493-1 [ITP] -- IBM Data Engine for NoSQL Software Libraries

2017-08-09 Thread Rodrigo
Hi Fred, > I didn't check deep but I can see that the packaging is not following > the latest policy manual (newer-standards-version) : have a look to this > document ( > https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/upgrading-checklist.txt ) > to fix this ; https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-poli

Bug#866601: RFS: segyio/1.2.0-1 [ITP: #864710]

2017-08-09 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 06:42:40AM +, Jørgen Kvalsvik wrote: > The .so and .a are installed by make install, but I'm manually invoking > dh_install to bind it to a particular package (after tip from another > debian maintainer), in order to not need a .install-file. Is this wrong? Yes, .install

Bug#866601: RFS: segyio/1.2.0-1 [ITP: #864710]

2017-08-09 Thread Jørgen Kvalsvik
The .so and .a are installed by make install, but I'm manually invoking dh_install to bind it to a particular package (after tip from another debian maintainer), in order to not need a .install-file. Is this wrong? From: Andrey Rahmatullin Sent: Tuesday,