Bug#871253: marked as done (RFS: python-sparse/0.1.1-1)

Your message dated Mon, 7 Aug 2017 22:43:42 +0100 with message-id <4457b7d6-eea8-9535-66f1-a752310f7...@gmail.com> and subject line uploaded to unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #871253, regarding RFS: python-sparse/0.1.1-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem h

Bug#868248: RFS: dcm2niix/1.0.20170624-1

On Sat, 05 Aug 2017 18:16:27 +0300 Al Nikolov wrote: Hi Ghislain. Please see [1] for an RFS bug template. [1]https://mentors.debian.net/sponsor/rfs-howto I have been contributing to Debian long-enough to get to know the RFS how-to. Thanks for the reminder anyway. What is still missing in

Bug#871318: marked as done (RFS: speedcrunch/0.12.0-2 [RC])

Your message dated Mon, 7 Aug 2017 18:54:32 +0200 with message-id <20170807165432.uzponiaslddly...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#871318: RFS: speedcrunch/0.12.0-2 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #871318, regarding RFS: speedcrunch/0.12.0-2 [RC] to be marked as done. This means that yo

Bug#870904: marked as done (RFS: dvdisaster/0.79.5-2)

Your message dated Mon, 07 Aug 2017 16:20:25 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: dvdisaster/0.79.5-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #870904, regarding RFS: dvdisaster/0.79.5-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not th

Bug#869692: RFS: cyclograph/1.9.0-1

> Patch headers should be in the DEP-3 format (lintian tells that). Now I have to ask for the option needed for lintian to tell that. I run lintian --display-info and it is not reporting anything about the patches. The lintian report at https://mentors.debian.net/package/cyclograph isn't showing a

Bug#871318: RFS: speedcrunch/0.12.0-2 [RC]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "speedcrunch" * Package name: speedcrunch Version : 0.12.0-2 Upstream Author : Helder Correia & others * URL : http://speedcrunch.org * License : GPL-2+

Bug#870909: RFS: cxlflash/4.3.2493-1 [ITP] -- IBM Data Engine for NoSQL Software Libraries

Hi Rodrigo, I do not intend to sponsor this package but I'm just willing to help. Be careful to target "Package: sponsorship-request*s*" : the bug as been properly re-assigned to "sponsorship-requests", but it didn't reach the mentors audience as I can tell. I didn't check deep but I can see tha

Bug#858155: RFS: stenc/1.0.7-1 [ITP]

Thank you for your comments, I have made the changes you mentioned and uploaded updated version to https://mentors.debian.net/package/stenc Regards Denys > On 29 Jul 2017, at 12:40, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > > The project license is GPL-2 while debian/copyright says GPL-2+. > Please update

Bug#871253: RFS: python-sparse/0.1.1-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the following package: * Package name: python-sparse Version : 0.1.1-1 Upstream Author : Matthew Rocklin * URL : https://github.com/mrocklin/sparse * License : BSD

Bug#863010: RFS: golang-github-nebulouslabs-bolt/1.0+git20170131.0.ca9f208-1 [ITP]

On Fri, 16 Jun 2017 08:48:34 +0200 Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > control: owner -1 ! > control: tags -1 moreinfo > > > * New upstream version > > missing changes, e.g. > "add myself to uploaders" > ping G. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#867617: RFS/ITP: node-rollup-plugin-replace/1.1.1-1

On Sat, 8 Jul 2017 08:00:08 + (UTC) Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > control: owner -1 ! > control: tags -1 moreinfo > > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-rollup-plugin-replace" > > > I don't have the uploaded binaries with me anymore, so please > remove moreinfo tag once th