Bug#864428: RFS: bitfield/0.6.3-1 [ITP #864358]

2017-07-04 Thread Andrew Donnellan
Hi Vitalie On 5 July 2017 at 11:55, wrote: > Hi, Andrew. > >> Obviously you've come first and taken the name > > Well, it's not so obvious to me. It looks like it is me, and not the author > of the other package, who created the name conflict. The software that you > intend to package dates ba

Bug#864428: RFS: bitfield/0.6.3-1 [ITP #864358]

2017-07-04 Thread vitalie
Hi, Andrew. > Obviously you've come first and taken the name Well, it's not so obvious to me. It looks like it is me, and not the author of the other package, who created the name conflict. The software that you intend to package dates back to 2006 (files in the tarball) or 2009 (commits in the

Bug#867182: RFS: openssl-ibmca/1.3.1-1 [ITP]

2017-07-04 Thread Paulo Ricardo Paz Vital
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "openssl-ibmca" * Package name: openssl-ibmca Version : 1.3.1-1 Upstream Author : openCryptoki Project * URL : https://github.com/opencryptoki/openssl-ibmca *

Bug#864428: RFS: bitfield/0.6.3-1 [ITP #864358]

2017-07-04 Thread Andrew Donnellan
Hi Vitalie I came across this RFS bug as I'm thinking of filing an ITP for another project called "bitfield" (http://jk.ozlabs.org/projects/bitfield/). Obviously you've come first and taken the name, so I guess I'll have to figure out what my package should be called, but just giving you a heads

Bug#867158: RFS: weresync/1.0.4-1 [ITP]

2017-07-04 Thread Daniel Manila
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "weresync" * Package name: weresync Version : 1.0.4-1 Upstream Author : Daniel Manila * URL : https://github.com/DonyorM/weresync * License : Apach

Re: copyright for debian/* files, collab-maint access

2017-07-04 Thread Ben Finney
Lukas Schwaighofer writes: > I declared my ITA gmrun and I have two questions: > > 1. The current debian/copyright is written in a way that it does not >apply to the debian/* files. The copyright file (you don't say which, so I am looking at https://sources.debian.net/src/gmrun/0.9.2-2.1/deb

Bug#867147: RFS: gmrun/0.9.2-3 [ITA]

2017-07-04 Thread Lukas Schwaighofer
Control: retitle -1 RFS: gmrun/0.9.2-3 [ITA] My last commit accidentally increased the Debian version, corrected. pgpno1f7qLX5W.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#867149: RFS: galternatives/0.13.5+nmu3+deb8u1

2017-07-04 Thread Boyuan Yang
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "galternatives" into *oldstable* (jessie-pu). * Package name: galternatives Version : 0.13.5+nmu3+deb8u1 Upstream Author : [not active] * URL : [defunct] * Lic

Bug#867147: RFS: gmrun/0.9.2-4 [ITA]

2017-07-04 Thread Lukas Schwaighofer
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the gmrun package, which I intend to adopt. I've uploaded the current state to mentors: https://mentors.debian.net/package/gmrun I've done the packaging using git. You can access my repository from

Bug#867145: RFS: fancon/0.11.13

2017-07-04 Thread Hayden Briese
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fancon" * Package name: fancon Version : 0.11.13 Upstream Author : Hayden Briese (haydenbri...@gmail.com) * URL : https://github.com/hbriese/fancon * License

Re: copyright for debian/* files, collab-maint access

2017-07-04 Thread Lukas Schwaighofer
On Tue, 4 Jul 2017 04:04:24 +0200 Adam Borowski wrote: > As the original maintainer declared the license as GPL-2 (only), it > seems obvious to me this applies to the packaging as well. I'd thus > not even bother contacting him and assume everything uses that > license. Ok, thanks for looking i