On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 18:17 +0700, Arnaud wrote:
> Is it a correct way of doing things ?
If the tarball you upload to Debian is bit-for-bit identical to the
tarball you upload to or get from github, then yes, otherwise no.
I used diffoscope to compare the tarball uploaded to github with the
tarb
Your message dated Tue, 06 Jun 2017 22:20:02 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: opencryptoki/3.7.0+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #863418,
regarding RFS: opencryptoki/3.7.0+dfsg-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Your message dated Tue, 6 Jun 2017 18:37:53 + (UTC)
with message-id <7223176.5780908.1496774273...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#864271: [Pkg-protobuf-devel] Bug#864271: RFS:
protobuf/3.3.1-0.1 [NMU]
has caused the Debian Bug report #864271,
regarding RFS: protobuf/3.3.1-0.1 [NMU]
t
Hi GCS,
Thank you for the quick reply.
On 6 June 2017 at 10:06, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
>> Clarification-moreinfo:
>> this tag is for protbuf maintainers to approve this NMU.
> You misspelled the package name and the tag as well, among other things.
Sorry for the typo, I fixed that t
Hi Paul, thx for the review.
>
>> The package is now built with `gbp` from a git tag. I guess it fixes the
>> problem.
> Please verify that is the case.
Well, I'm not a 100% sure that I'm doing it right here. Let me explain
the situation.
PNMixer switched to CMake, so there is no more 'make dis
Hi Lumin,
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 6:15 AM, Lumin wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
> Tags: morinfo
> X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-protobuf-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
>
> Clarification-moreinfo:
> this tag is for protbuf maintainers to approve this NMU.
You misspelled the package
6 matches
Mail list logo
