Bug#859073: RFS: groonga/7.0.1-1

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 03:33:27PM +0900, Kentaro Hayashi wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "groonga" > > * Package name: groonga > Version : 7.0.1-1 > Changes since last upload: > > * New upstream release. > * debian/patches/fix-nginx-FTBFS-on-kfreebsd.patch >

Bug#859776: marked as done (sponsorship-requests: vis/0.3 [ITP] -- A a modern and legacy free Vim-like text editor)

Your message dated Sun, 9 Apr 2017 01:57:56 +0200 with message-id <20170408235756.rfvifcughvrk6...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#859776: sponsorship-requests: vis/0.3 [ITP] -- A a modern and legacy free Vim-like text editor has caused the Debian Bug report #859776, regarding sponsorship-req

Bug#858476: marked as done (RFS: wolfssl/3.10.2+dfsg-1 [RC] -- wolfSSL encryption library)

Your message dated Sun, 9 Apr 2017 01:34:52 +0200 with message-id <20170408233452.zc4bayoix7qn2...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#858476: RFS: wolfssl/3.10.2+dfsg-1 [RC] -- wolfSSL encryption library has caused the Debian Bug report #858476, regarding RFS: wolfssl/3.10.2+dfsg-1 [RC] -- wolfS

Bug#858476: RFS: wolfssl/3.10.2+dfsg-1 [RC] -- wolfSSL encryption library

For some reason, the latest version enabled SHA-224 only on amd64. Upstream advised that the algorithm should be available on all architectures. I uploaded an updated package to Mentors , but did not cross-build. Will you please try again? Thank you! On

Bug#840750: RFS: picocoin/0.1-2.gbp43047g

Sorry for the delay. Concerning your latest upload, 0.1-2+nmu1: - The yellow flags on the mentors page should be cleared - This is not an NMU (non-maintainer upload). Look at the help message associated with the lintian issue. - the home page and Vcs links are commented out in control

Bug#844988: marked as done (RFS: gnu-social/1.2+20160913+git7d67eefd+dfsg4-1 [ITP] -- Distributed social networking platform)

Your message dated Sat, 08 Apr 2017 22:21:53 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: gnu-social/1.2+20160913+git7d67eefd+dfsg4-1 [ITP] -- Distributed social networking platform has caused the Debian Bug report #844988, regarding RFS: gnu-social/1.2+20160913+git7d67eefd+dfsg4-1 [ITP] -

Bug#859238: marked as done (RFS: microsoft-gsl/0.1~2017.03.20~git16a6a41-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Sat, 8 Apr 2017 22:34:52 +0200 with message-id <20170408203451.srpftycl3k2t6...@mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#859238: RFS: microsoft-gsl/0.1~2017.03.20~git16a6a41-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #859238, regarding RFS: microsoft-gsl/0.1~2017.03.20~git16a6a41-1 [ITP] to

Bug#859238: RFS: microsoft-gsl/0.1~2017.03.20~git16a6a41-1

08.04.2017 18:07, Mattia Rizzolo пишет: Nice, would you also please push upstream and prisitine-tar branches? (you may name upstream and debian branches as you see fit, just be sure HEAD points to the packaging branch and debian/gbp.conf reflects the reality if it's not the default) Done. Loo

Bug#859238: RFS: microsoft-gsl/0.1~2017.03.20~git16a6a41-1

Control: retitle 859221 ITP: ms-gsl -- Microsoft Guidelines Support Library Control: reitle -1 RFS: ms-gsl/0~git20170403.ebab8ca-1 On Sat, Apr 08, 2017 at 05:33:35PM +0300, Коля Гурьев wrote: > 04.04.2017 03:22, Mattia Rizzolo пишет: > > As I said privately, I'd enjoy having a git repository for t

Bug#859238: RFS: microsoft-gsl/0.1~2017.03.20~git16a6a41-1

04.04.2017 03:22, Mattia Rizzolo пишет: As others said already, 'microsoft' in the package name is a sad situation. Personally, is just a can of worms I do not want to open for so little, so please rename it to something else (I like 'ms-gsl'). I changed package name to ms-gsl as you want (lib

Bug#859776: sponsorship-requests: vis/0.3 [ITP] -- A a modern and legacy free Vim-like text editor

On 2017-04-07 19:54, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 05:52:21PM +0200, Paride Legovini wrote: >> On 2017-04-07 15:39, Adam Borowski wrote: >>> On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 12:54:22PM +0200, Paride Legovini wrote: * Package name: vis Version : 0.3 > > Seems to be