On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 12:15:49PM -0700, Felix Lechner wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "wolfssl":
>
> * Package name: wolfssl
> Version : 3.10.2+dfsg-1
> It builds those binary packages:
>
> libwolfssl10 - wolfSSL encryption library
vs libwolfssl3 in
Your message dated Fri, 7 Apr 2017 21:39:59 + (UTC)
with message-id <1816932071.2160678.1491601199...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#859753: RFS:gnss-sdr/0.0.9-1 -- Global navigation
satellite systems software defined receiver
has caused the Debian Bug report #859753,
regarding RFS:
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 05:52:21PM +0200, Paride Legovini wrote:
> On 2017-04-07 15:39, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 12:54:22PM +0200, Paride Legovini wrote:
> >> * Package name: vis
> >>Version : 0.3
Seems to be fine, except for two error messages I get:
/usr
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 02:23:08PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> (I see you cc'd Iain, so in case feel free to sponsor the package or
> require more/less changes from him :) )
My workload is quite heavy at the moment, thanks for taking a look at this
Gianfranco. I had planned to not l
On 2017-04-07 15:39, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 12:54:22PM +0200, Paride Legovini wrote:
>> * Package name: vis
>>Version : 0.3
>
>> It's my main editor, so I'm willing to keep the package well maintained and
>> up
>> to date.
>
> If, per the home page, it's
Dear Gianfranco,
I’ve uploaded the package tagged as experimental, and with a improved changelog
https://mentors.debian.net/package/gnss-sdr
Thanks,
Carles
> El 7 abr 2017, a las 16:23, Gianfranco Costamagna
> escribió:
>
> Hello,
>
>> I think uploading the package to experimental is ok,
Hello,
>I think uploading the package to experimental is ok, so it can benefit from
>its auto-building infrastructure. Do I need to upload a new version with more
>verbosity >in the Changelog?
well, you already have to tweak changelog to point to experimental rather than
unstable, so a new li
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 12:54:22PM +0200, Paride Legovini wrote:
> * Package name: vis
>Version : 0.3
> It's my main editor, so I'm willing to keep the package well maintained and up
> to date.
If, per the home page, it's not fully vi compatible, it can't be entirely
bad :p Let'
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 07:41:51AM -0400, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> * Package name: xtrs
> Version : 4.9d-2
> https://mentors.debian.net/package/xtrs
> dget -x
> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/x/xtrs/xtrs_4.9d-2.dsc
I'm afraid these URLs are 404-compliant
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I seek a sponsor for my package "xtrs".
* Package name: xtrs
Version : 4.9d-2
Upstream Author : Tim Mann
* URL : http://www.tim-mann.org/xtrs.html
* License : 2 different custom permissive licenses
Thanks Gianfranco for you assistance,
I think uploading the package to experimental is ok, so it can benefit from its
auto-building infrastructure. Do I need to upload a new version with more
verbosity in the Changelog?
Best regards,
Carles
> El 7 abr 2017, a las 11:41, Gianfranco Costamagna
Em qui, 2017-04-06 às 20:09 +, Debian Bug Tracking System escreveu:
> Have you looked at the arm{el,hf} issue, BTW?
I'm working on the source code to fix on my next version.
Thanks!
--
Carlos Donizete Froes [a.k.a coringao]
- https://wiki.debian.org/coringao
GPG: 4096R/B638B780
2157 630B D4
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I'm looking for a sponsor for "vis":
* Package name: vis
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : Marc André Tanner
* URL : https://github.com/martanne/vis
* License : ISC
Section : editors
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package “gnss-sdr":
your package looks good, unfortunately we are during freeze, so I would say we
should
upload in experimental and then in unstable once Stretch is released.
How do you feel about that?
also, som
Hello,
The reason for not using a "dirs" file is that in general the upstream build
system should
work "alone", without external helping from our side.
This patch is upstreamable, and fixes the issue for other distros out there.
Having such custom hacks in debian packaging hides the problem, an
15 matches
Mail list logo
