Bug#844406: marked as done (RFS: highlighterpdf/0.1.1-1 [ITP])

2017-04-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 04 Apr 2017 22:21:24 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: highlighterpdf/0.1.1-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #844399, regarding RFS: highlighterpdf/0.1.1-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#844399: marked as done (RFS: highlighterpdf/0.1.1-1 [ITP])

2017-04-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 04 Apr 2017 22:21:24 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: highlighterpdf/0.1.1-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #844399, regarding RFS: highlighterpdf/0.1.1-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#842041: marked as done (RFS: highlighterpdf/0.1.1-1 [ITP])

2017-04-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 04 Apr 2017 22:21:24 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: highlighterpdf/0.1.1-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #844399, regarding RFS: highlighterpdf/0.1.1-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#859568: RFS: gnome-games-app/3.24.0.2-1 [ITP]

2017-04-04 Thread Jeremy Bicha
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnome-games-app" * Package name: gnome-games-app Version : 3.24.0.2-1 Upstream Author : Adrien Plazas, Sebastien Nicouleaud * URL : https://wiki.gnome.org/Ap

Bug#859567: RFS: retro-gtk/0.10.0-1 [ITP]

2017-04-04 Thread Jeremy Bicha
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "retro-gtk" * Package name: retro-gtk Version : 0.10.0-1 Upstream Author : Adrien Plazas * URL : https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Games * License : GPL-3+ Se

Bug#858860: RFS: arpwatch [ITA]

2017-04-04 Thread Lukas Schwaighofer
Hi Hugo, thanks a lot for looking at this. I have made some changes to the package based on your feedback, pushed them to my git repository and uploaded the new version to mentors: https://mentors.debian.net/package/arpwatch Some further questions and comments follow inline below. On Tue, 4 Apr

Bug#859238: RFS: microsoft-gsl/0.1~2017.03.20~git16a6a41-1

2017-04-04 Thread PICCORO McKAY Lenz
i dont understand why the other package depends on that? of course, if more a more moco-soft related will be packaged, this package good to be includen in distribution, its a common case in all mocosoft related... the main target its to use more and more their "standars", i really hate all mocosof

Bug#858860: RFS: arpwatch [ITA]

2017-04-04 Thread Hugo Lefeuvre
Hi Lukas, > > Gianfranco suggested also asking the pkg-security-team for possible > > sponsors. It would be great if one of you could have a look and > > provide guidance! If team maintenance is be possible, I'd like that > > very much. > > I think arpwatch would be a good fit for the team. Is t