Your message dated Sat, 18 Mar 2017 19:39:28 -0700
with message-id <20170319023928.g225qfqwao22u...@iris.silentflame.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#856827: RFS: xfce4-equake-plugin/1.3.8.1-2 [RC]
has caused the Debian Bug report #856827,
regarding RFS: xfce4-equake-plugin/1.3.8.1-2 [RC]
to be marked
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "stenc"
* Package name: stenc
Version : 1.0.7-1
Upstream Author : John Coleman
* URL : https://sourceforge.net/projects/stenc/
* License : GPLv2
Section
> Dear Jeroen,
>
> Please be sure to CC the RFS bug!
Forgot the "reply all". I did send it to the RFS bug separately.
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 10:49:27PM -0700, Jeroen van Aart wrote:
> You still haven't noted that you updated the copyright years. And you
> haven't documented updating the Home
Hello Andreas,
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 11:32:25PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I have understood from NEWS.debian of pbuilder 0.228 that the '-S'
> option does not work any more. Unfortunately I did not understood what
> I need to do now to do a source only build (nor what the problem of this
>
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 03:45:30PM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> how would the unpacked source directory become unclean if I'm using pbuilder
> or
> sbuild to build my packages?
The developer might drop in debian/ (or in ./ in the case of a native
package) any kind of file and that would be pa
Quoting Mattia Rizzolo (2017-03-18 08:53:21)
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 08:22:36AM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> > So just as with sbuild I don't see why anybody would want to *only* build
> > the
> > source package inside a chroot. Since the source package is the *input* to
> > the
> > whole o
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 08:22:36AM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> So just as with sbuild I don't see why anybody would want to *only* build the
> source package inside a chroot. Since the source package is the *input* to the
> whole operation, you would just get back what you already put in.
The
Hi,
Quoting Andrey Rahmatullin (2017-03-18 07:58:56)
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 07:25:32AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > James Clarke wrote in https://bugs.debian.org/853886#10:
> > >
> > > "For source-only builds, I don't understand why you would want to
> > > perform the build in a chroot.
>
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
These two packages both have backwards-incompatible ABI changes. This leads to
2 new binary packages: libbtbb1 and libubertooth1
As a DM I cannot upload new binary packages.
Can anyone help me out?
You will find the packages here:
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 07:25:32AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > James Clarke wrote in https://bugs.debian.org/853886#10:
> >
> > "For source-only builds, I don't understand why you would want to
> > perform the build in a chroot.
>
> Since Build-Depends are requested on my local machine anyway
10 matches
Mail list logo
