Hi Gianfranco,
Sorry for my delay.
2017-02-22 18:51 GMT-03:00 Gianfranco Costamagna :
>
> seems barriere wasn't so happy with my test...
> Did you open an i386 chroot, right?
> sessionid=$(schroot -b -c sid_i386-dchroot)
>
> The machine is an amd64, so you have to specify the correct chroot to te
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2017 19:48:08 -0700
with message-id <20170227024808.3j3tmtrvc6mw5...@iris.silentflame.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#856151: RFS: gexiv2/0.10.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #856151,
regarding RFS: gexiv2/0.10.4-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 05:12:44PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> I built the package and then ran Lintian. It produces an error
>
> E: libgexiv2-2:
> symbols-file-contains-current-version-with-debian-revision on symbol
> _ZN5Exiv28XmpdatumaSIlEERS0_RKT_@Base a
control: tag -1 +moreinfo
Dear Jason,
Thank you for fixing the changelog.
I built the package and then ran Lintian. It produces an error
E: libgexiv2-2:
symbols-file-contains-current-version-with-debian-revision on symbol
_ZN5Exiv28XmpdatumaSIlEERS0_RKT_@Base and 1 others
--
Sean Wh
On Sun, 26 Feb 2017, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "entropybroker"
This is rather strange.
BTW since Thorsten is the maintainer, and he is active, an NMU for a bug opened
some
hours ago would be *totally* unappropriate.
Indeed, it is also the wron
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "entropybroker"
I can sponsor it if you get
1) an unblock bug approved
or
2) a targeted fixes for the RC bug.
I admit, the new release is mostly a "fix manpage, merge debian patches, fix rc
bug, release"
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:36:57PM +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 10:59 PM, Tim Kuijsten wrote:
> > The Vcs-* links are removed since the debian directory is not included in
> > the official repo.
>
> I guess you misunderstand Sean's words.
>
> There're two types of Vcs:
>
Thanks for the tips on this. I am brand new to packaging Debian products. The
product I am working on packaging is
https://github.com/keepassxreboot/keepassxc. My main goal with packaging it is
because I am a big fan of it and I keep my systems clean so I want a pure
Debian package that I can i
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 05:10:11PM +0100, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> >> I just added "dub run" to debian/rules.
> >
> > I think you want "dub build" instead.
>
> Yes, `dub build` is the right thing to do,
Fine.
> but in general I would
> strongly recommend to not use dub at all for Debian pac
On 02/26/2017 04:52 PM, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2017-02-26 at 10:47, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 2017-02-26 at 10:15 -0500, matt jones wrote:
>>
>>> I am packaging a gui that has dependencies for qt and such. How do
>>> I go about ensuring that X is available as well? Do I list that as
Hello!
2017-02-26 15:19 GMT+01:00 James Cowgill :
> Hi,
>
> On 26/02/17 07:03, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 10:01:17PM +, James Cowgill wrote:
>>> On 25/02/17 21:31, Andreas Tille wrote:
I intend to package BioD[1] but I have no idea how to build the D code
(and ru
On 2017-02-26 at 10:47, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> On Sun, 2017-02-26 at 10:15 -0500, matt jones wrote:
>
>> I am packaging a gui that has dependencies for qt and such. How do
>> I go about ensuring that X is available as well? Do I list that as
>> a dependency as well. The upstream maintainers d
On Sun, 2017-02-26 at 10:15 -0500, matt jones wrote:
> I am packaging a gui that has dependencies for qt and such. How do I go about
> ensuring that X is available as well? Do I list that as a dependency as well.
> The upstream maintainers don’t call it out specifically but it is understood.
> L
Dear Matt,
libqt5gui5 is already depending on the needed X libraries, so unless
your app is doing something tricky, you don't need to care about this.
But we can tell more if we see the application in question...
Regards,
Zoltan Gyarmati
https://zgyarmati.de
On 02/26/2017 04:15 PM, matt jones
Dear Matt,
libqt5gui5 is already depending on the needed X libraries, so unless
your app is doing something tricky, you don't need to care about this.
But we can tell more if we see the application in question...
Regards,
Zoltan Gyarmati
https://zgyarmati.de
On 02/26/2017 04:15 PM, matt jones
I am packaging a gui that has dependencies for qt and such. How do I go about
ensuring that X is available as well? Do I list that as a dependency as well.
The upstream maintainers don’t call it out specifically but it is understood.
Links to docs are always welcome.
Thanks!
--
Matt Jo
Hi,
On 26/02/17 07:03, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 10:01:17PM +, James Cowgill wrote:
>> On 25/02/17 21:31, Andreas Tille wrote:
>>> I intend to package BioD[1] but I have no idea how to build the D code
>>> (and run the unit tests). Considering BioD is a library I might ne
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 07:03:33PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> You are missing a # before the number of the bug you are closing in your
> changelog.
I've fixed the changelog entry. I think I got it wrong because I
misread the gbp documentation on meta tags. Fixed an
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "entropybroker"
* Package name: entropybroker
Version : 2.9-0.1
Upstream Author : Folkert van Heusden
* URL : https://www.vanheusden.com/entropybroker/
* Li
Hi,
sorry it took me some time to get to this, I've been hooked up by some
real life stuff...
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 11:35:18PM +0300, Коля Гурьев wrote:
> Oh, but they have released a new version today.
few minutes/hours after this they released another one too, it seems :P
They took the whole
20 matches
Mail list logo
