Em Tue, 21 Feb 2017 16:06:06 + (UTC)
Gianfranco Costamagna escreveu:
Hello Gianfranco,
First of all thank you for the quick reply!
> control: owner -1 !
> control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> hello Marcelo,
>
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "htp"
>
>
> sadly we are on freeze,
Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2017 19:41:17 +
with message-id
and subject line RE:Bug#854706: RFS on hold
has caused the Debian Bug report #854706,
regarding RFS: spyder-unittest/0.1.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
control: reopen -1
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
>I'd rather drop the upload of spyder-unittest/0.1.0-1 altogether and
>submit spyder-unittest/0.1.1-1 (which I can prepare soon).
ack ok!
$ dcut ftp-master cancel -f spyder-unittest_0.1.0-1_amd64.changes
Uploading commands file
When we are checking a debian package, lintian is always the best friend.
Running lintian against telegram-desktop 1.0.12 gives the following
information:
% lintian -E -I --pedantic ./*.dsc ./*.deb
P: telegram-desktop source: source-contains-autogenerated-visual-c++-file
Telegram/Resources/win
Dear mentors,
I am working on a simultaneous binary and source package split, also
simultaneous with a DFSG-repack. I request a review of my d/control
files.
Summary
===
Before:
src:dash-el 2.13.0-1.1 builds
bin:dash-el containing dash.el and dash-functional.el
After:
src:dash-el 2.
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
hello Marcelo,
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "htp"
sadly we are on freeze, I can sponsor on experimental with two little changes:
added a newline before your signature on changelog file (line 23)
changed unstable/experimental
I'm wor
Hi
>Thanks! Let me know if you'd like any additional changes made.
I'll let Josh doing the final checks and upload
(note: I didn't check your changes, but based on your reply
I think we are good!)
G.
Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2017 13:57:21 + (UTC)
with message-id <489480270.3380459.1487685441...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#854706: RFS on hold
has caused the Debian Bug report #854706,
regarding RFS: spyder-unittest/0.1.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you cl
Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2017 14:46:14 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: RFS: pytest-xvfb/1.0.0-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #854682,
regarding RFS: pytest-xvfb/1.0.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2017 14:47:34 +0100
with message-id <3623e259-bccf-5290-8a3d-87cca21e5...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: RFS: pytest-qt/2.1.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #854888,
regarding RFS: pytest-qt/2.1.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Thu, 2017-02-09 at 18:00 +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "spyder-unittest"
>
> * Package name: spyder-unittest
> Version : 0.1.0-1
>
On 2017-02-17 05:29:44, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Quoting Gianfranco Costamagna (2017-02-17 11:11:35)
> > lets review:
> > a) PAPT seems more appropriate
> > b) "alot (0.3.7-1) unstable; urgency=medium"
> > this never went in unstable, please merge the two changelog entries
> > together with the c
12 matches
Mail list logo
