Your message dated Fri, 17 Feb 2017 07:50:21 + (UTC)
with message-id <665435280.1555768.1487317821...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#855355: RFS: nasm/2.12.02-1 [ITA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #855355,
regarding RFS: nasm/2.12.02-1 [ITA]
to be marked as done.
This means that y
Hi Adam,
(I didn't get your mail from you, just through the bug
notification...)
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 02:06:04AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> which was filed against the sponsorship-requests package:
>
> #855171: RFS
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
>But, if I am able to adopt this package, then I would move this under
>debian's collab-maint project.
where did the current maintainer orphaned the package?
did he acked the changes to add you on uploaders list?
He is a dm, why can't he sponsor it?
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: low
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "alot"
Package name: alot
Version : 0.5.1-1
Upstream Author : Patrick Totzke
URL : https://github.com/pazz/alot
License : GPL-3+, LGPL-2.1+
Section
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: low
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nasm"
Package name: nasm
Version : 2.12.02-1
Upstream Author : "H. Peter Anvin"
URL : http://www.nasm.us/
License : BSD-2-clause
Section : devel
Your message dated Fri, 17 Feb 2017 04:20:26 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: genwqe-user/4.0.18-1 [ITP #826774]
has caused the Debian Bug report #841185,
regarding RFS: genwqe-user/4.0.18-1 [ITP #826774]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 4:23 AM, Iban Eguia wrote:
> already was a package named `super` in the Debian repositories.
>
> We first thought of changing our package name to something other than
> `super`, but we then noticed that the package had not been updated in more
> than 9 years, and we thought
Your message dated Fri, 17 Feb 2017 03:03:27 +0100
with message-id <20170217020327.lfa422spznvx3...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#855171: RFS: tlf/1.3.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #855171,
regarding RFS: tlf/1.3.0-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 03:23:30PM -0500, Iban Eguia wrote:
> Debian by our package. As a summary, our package is written in Rust and
> currently requires java-jre as a dependency, since it also packages some Java
> projects we currently use for the analysis. All the project and dependencies
> we
Did you contact with Robert Luberda, the package maintainer for "super"?
Anyway, a more specific name should be better than "super", such as
"super-aa" or "android-analyzer".
__
I'm using this express-made address because personal addresses aren't
masked enough at this list's archives. Ma
Dear fellow members of the Debian mentoring community.
I am one of the maintainers of [SUPER Android
Analyzer](http://superanalyzer.rocks/), an application to check an Android APK
application for vulnerabilities. The software has lots of potential and has
been added to some software distributio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Thank you for your attention. I'll make changes.
Em qui, 2017-02-16 às 02:08 +0100, Adam Borowski escreveu:
> Control: tags -1 +moreinfo
>
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 02:00:38AM -0200, Carlos Donizete Froes wrote:
> > I am looking for a sponsor fo
__
I'm using this express-made address because personal addresses aren't
masked enough at this list's archives. Mailing lists service
administrator should fix this.
El 16/02/17 a les 11:20, Gianfranco Costamagna ha escrit:
> Hello,
>
>> W: ntfsundelete-tree source: out-of-date-standards-ve
Hello, I tried to debug this issue, but I didn't find anything useful
http://bugs.debian.org/855166
the failure doesn't happen on local pbuilder sid i386 environment, neither
on DebOMatic sid i386 environment (it should be really close to the one
used on buildd).
But I can reproduce it on barri
Hello,
>W: ntfsundelete-tree source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.9.0
>(current is 3.9.4)
(this really depends on lintian version you are using, don't blindly trust it!)
>Independently of what Lintian says, how can I detect Standards-Version
>used in any Debian-like OS?
https://tracker.debi
When checking files with Lintian, it shows:
W: ntfsundelete-tree source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.9.0
(current is 3.9.4)
Independently of what Lintian says, how can I detect Standards-Version
used in any Debian-like OS?
Thanks.
--
__
I'm using this express-made address because
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:27:28AM +0100, Narcis Garcia wrote:
> Hello, how can I find somebody that can includes this software to Debian
> official?
https://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello, how can I find somebody that can includes this software to Debian
official?
https://git.actiu.net/libre/ntfsundelete-tree
Thanks.
--
__
I'm using this express-made address because personal addresses aren't
masked enough at this list's archives. Mailing lists service
administrat
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 01:53:59PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 09:50:32AM +0100, Ervin Hegedüs wrote:
> > > > > > > > I'm working on another (hamradio related) package(s)... Also
> > > > > > > > should I wait with them?
> > > > > > > With all packages already exi
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 09:50:32AM +0100, Ervin Hegedüs wrote:
> > > > > > > I'm working on another (hamradio related) package(s)... Also
> > > > > > > should I wait with them?
> > > > > > With all packages already existing in testing.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm sorry, but I don't understand this rea
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 01:47:23PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 09:41:13AM +0100, Ervin Hegedüs wrote:
> > > > > > I'm working on another (hamradio related) package(s)... Also
> > > > > > should I wait with them?
> > > > > With all packages already existing in tes
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 09:41:13AM +0100, Ervin Hegedüs wrote:
> > > > > I'm working on another (hamradio related) package(s)... Also
> > > > > should I wait with them?
> > > > With all packages already existing in testing.
> > >
> > > I'm sorry, but I don't understand this really...
> > What part
Hi Andrey,
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 01:33:25PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 09:29:02AM +0100, Ervin Hegedüs wrote:
> > > > I'm working on another (hamradio related) package(s)... Also
> > > > should I wait with them?
> > > With all packages already existing in testing.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 09:29:02AM +0100, Ervin Hegedüs wrote:
> > > I'm working on another (hamradio related) package(s)... Also
> > > should I wait with them?
> > With all packages already existing in testing.
>
> I'm sorry, but I don't understand this really...
What part of it? The reasons writ
Hi Andrey,
thanks for the helpful answer,
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 12:30:23PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 08:18:44AM +0100, Ervin Hegedüs wrote:
> > > However, are you sure you want this uploaded to unstable during freeze?
> > > It
> > > will make it really unpleas
25 matches
Mail list logo
