Re: Build-Depends vs Depends

2016-12-29 Thread Harlan Lieberman-Berg
Taylor Kline writes: > What is the difference? How are they treated differently during the > apt installation process? Thanks :) Build-Depends is used only during build-time. (Usually on the buildds, though it can be on developer's computers as well.) Depends, on the other hand, are packages th

Build-Depends vs Depends

2016-12-29 Thread Taylor Kline
What is the difference? How are they treated differently during the apt installation process? Thanks :)

Bug#848687: RFS: yasnippet-snippets_0~git20161123-1

2016-12-29 Thread Alberto Luaces
Hello Sean, Sean Whitton writes: > Hello Alberto, > > On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 11:43:29PM +0100, Alberto Luaces wrote: >> I have now pushed a new release. > > Did someone else upload 0~git20161123-1? > No... > > If not, you should merge the changelog entries for -1 and -2. It's just > confusing

Bug#849581: RFS: numpydoc/0.6.0+ds1-1

2016-12-29 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
On Thu, 2016-12-29 at 15:05 +, Sean Whitton wrote: > Dear Ghislain, > > On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 02:00:47PM +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > > Next time, please consider providing your suggestion straight-away. > > I couldn't because I didn't understand your changelog entry! > > > Done. All

Bug#849581: marked as done (RFS: numpydoc/0.6.0+ds1-1)

2016-12-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 29 Dec 2016 15:05:48 + with message-id <20161229150548.oykmwbpc4bb3r...@zephyr.silentflame.com> and subject line Re: Bug#849581: RFS: numpydoc/0.6.0+ds1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #849581, regarding RFS: numpydoc/0.6.0+ds1-1 to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#849581: RFS: numpydoc/0.6.0+ds1-1

2016-12-29 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
On Thu, 2016-12-29 at 12:55 +, Sean Whitton wrote: > Hello Ghislain, > > On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 12:48:35PM +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > > > > [ Ghislain Antony Vaillant ] > > > > * Filter upstream tarball from vendored sphinx.ext.linkcode > > > > > > Why? It's not explained anywher

Bug#849581: RFS: numpydoc/0.6.0+ds1-1

2016-12-29 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello Ghislain, On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 12:48:35PM +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > > > [ Ghislain Antony Vaillant ] > > > * Filter upstream tarball from vendored sphinx.ext.linkcode > > > > Why? It's not explained anywhere why this was necessary. It would be > > good if you could note it

Bug#849581: RFS: numpydoc/0.6.0+ds1-1

2016-12-29 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
On 29/12/16 08:40, Sean Whitton wrote: control: tag -1 +moreinfo control: owner -1 ! Dear Ghislain, On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 09:47:09PM +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package "numpydoc" I can sponsor this for you, but I'd like to ask you to improve your chan

Bug#849627: RFS: xtrkcad/1:4.2.4a-1 ITA

2016-12-29 Thread Sean Whitton
control: tag -1 +moreinfo Dear Jörg, On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 10:08:50AM +0100, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote: >   I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xtrkcad" I'd like to sponsor this. I assume it's okay for me to work out of your collab-maint repo. >   Changes since the last upload: > >   *

Bug#849387: RFS: farmhash/0~20161014-g92e897b-1 [ITP]

2016-12-29 Thread lumin
On Tue, 2016-12-27 at 22:47 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: > I don't see why you would do that...? It's my bad -- I misunderstood your comments. > What I meant is that you install a lot of cruft that doesn't appear to be > user docs at all I agree with that. I reverted the package split and moved t

Bug#849627: RFS: xtrkcad/1:4.2.4a-1 ITA

2016-12-29 Thread Jörg Frings-Fürst
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal   Dear mentors,   I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xtrkcad"   Package name: xtrkcad    Version : 1:4.2.4a-1   URL : http://www.xtrkcad.org/Wikka/HomePage   License : GPL-2+ and other    Section :

Bug#849581: RFS: numpydoc/0.6.0+ds1-1

2016-12-29 Thread Sean Whitton
control: tag -1 +moreinfo control: owner -1 ! Dear Ghislain, On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 09:47:09PM +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "numpydoc" I can sponsor this for you, but I'd like to ask you to improve your changelog a bit -- see below. > Changes sinc