On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 3:53 AM, David Hart wrote:
> However will it be accepted into debian? The project is moribund: apart from a
> single commit 3 years ago, it's been unmaintained for 6 years. That was
> supposed to give time for a rewrite which hasn't happened.
I might be a good idea for 4pa
Your message dated Sat, 24 Dec 2016 23:48:23 +0100
with message-id <20161224224823.ga20...@fatal.se>
and subject line Re: Bug#848993: RFS: llmnrd/0.2-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #848993,
regarding RFS: llmnrd/0.2.1-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Hello David,
On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 07:53:09PM +, David Hart wrote:
> Many thanks for the offer. I don't mind packaging Bakefile, and it shouldn't
> be
> difficult to do.
>
> However will it be accepted into debian? The project is moribund: apart from a
> single commit 3 years ago, it's bee
Dear Sean,
>Thank you for revising your work in light of my review. We're too late
>to get 4Pane into stretch, so there's no longer any time pressure on
>this review process.
I know. It missed the jessie freeze too ;)
>So I'd like to reply regarding only the Bakefile
>issue, since that's the bi
Am 24. Dezember 2016 12:57:37 MEZ, schrieb "Félix Sipma"
:
>Hi Tobias and Jose,
>
>I get your remarks Tobias, thanks again for your detailed reviews.
>
>If a NMU is out of scope for a lot of my changes, wouldn't be easier to
>just
>change the maintainer to QA (or me)? No offense is intended, it's
Your message dated Sat, 24 Dec 2016 18:13:07 +0100
with message-id <20161224171306.2j4mfxvlmel5p...@mapreri.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#841066: RFS: gnome-shell-extensions-pixelsaver/1.9-1,
ITP: 829089 -- pixel saver extension for GNOME shell
has caused the Debian Bug report #841066,
regarding R
Dear David,
Thank you for revising your work in light of my review. We're too late
to get 4Pane into stretch, so there's no longer any time pressure on
this review process. So I'd like to reply regarding only the Bakefile
issue, since that's the biggest blocker to uploading this. Once we've
res
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Notes:
* It is a Tensorflow dependency.
* It is a header-only package with unit tests.
* I plan to keep it in experimental for some time.
* Its default build system is Bazel, I translated
its original buildsystem into CMake for building
the unit
Hi Tobias and Jose,
I get your remarks Tobias, thanks again for your detailed reviews.
If a NMU is out of scope for a lot of my changes, wouldn't be easier to just
change the maintainer to QA (or me)? No offense is intended, it's just that
doing a NMU and then another upload with the other change
On Saturday 24 December 2016 11:38:01 Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 09:41:29PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Friday 23 December 2016 14:46:53 Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> > > You use DAEMON_OPTS in the default file, while sysvinit seems to
> > > be standardizing on DAEMON_ARG
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 09:41:29PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Friday 23 December 2016 14:46:53 Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> > You use DAEMON_OPTS in the default file, while sysvinit seems to be
> > standardizing on DAEMON_ARGS to avoid the messy work of later
> > migration of conffile settin
11 matches
Mail list logo
