Bug#848912: marked as done (RFS: node-file-sync-cmp/0.1.1-1 [ITP])

2016-12-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 22 Dec 2016 11:27:56 +0530 with message-id and subject line Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#848912: RFS: node-file-sync-cmp/0.1.1-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #848912, regarding RFS: node-file-sync-cmp/0.1.1-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you cla

Bug#849018: RFS: kakoune/0~2016.12.20.1.3a6167ae-1 [ITP]

2016-12-21 Thread Peter Pentchev
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kakoune" * Package name: kakoune Version : 0~2016.12.20.1.3a6167ae-1 Upstream Author : Maxime Coste * URL : http://kakoune.org/ * License : public domain

Bug#849014: RFS: forge/0.9.2-1

2016-12-21 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "forge" * Package name: forge Version : 0.9.2-1 Upstream Author : ArrayFire * URL : https://github.com/arrayfire/forge * License : BSD Section : l

Bug#846306: RFS: ondir/0.2.3+git0.55279f03-1 [ITP]

2016-12-21 Thread Christian Seiler
Dear mentors, I'd appreciate it if a friendly DD could have a look at this package and sponsor it. Thanks. :) On 11/30/2016 02:03 AM, Christian Seiler wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > Control: block 846237 by -1 > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for m

Bug#847609: marked as done (RFS: python-btrees/4.3.1-1 [ITP])

2016-12-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 21 Dec 2016 16:27:10 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: python-btrees/4.3.1-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #847609, regarding RFS: python-btrees/4.3.1-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. I

Bug#848993: RFS: llmnrd/0.2-1 [ITP]

2016-12-21 Thread Pali Rohár
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "llmnrd" * Package name: llmnrd Version : 0.2-1 Upstream Author : Tobias Klauser * URL : https://github.com/tklauser/llmnrd * License : GPL-2 Sect

Bug#848969: RFS: dvdisaster/0.79.5-1~exp1

2016-12-21 Thread Carlos Maddela
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dvdisaster" * Package name: dvdisaster Version : 0.79.5-1~exp1 Upstream Author : Carsten Gnörlich * URL : http://dvdisaster.net/ * License : GPL-3

Re: Source upload of r-cran-treescape does not build on any architecture - but why?

2016-12-21 Thread Christian Seiler
On 12/21/2016 12:19 PM, Christian Seiler wrote: > On 12/21/2016 12:04 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: >> Is bach.hen...@gmail.com the correct address for "contacting wanna-build >> people"? If yesm Henrik is in CC - if not what's the proper contact? > > There's a mailing list for that: > > https://list

Re: Source upload of r-cran-treescape does not build on any architecture - but why?

2016-12-21 Thread Christian Seiler
Hi, (dropping cc) On 12/21/2016 12:04 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Is bach.hen...@gmail.com the correct address for "contacting wanna-build > people"? If yesm Henrik is in CC - if not what's the proper contact? There's a mailing list for that: https://lists.debian.org/debian-wb-team/ See also th

Re: Source upload of r-cran-treescape does not build on any architecture - but why?

2016-12-21 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Christian, On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:46:28AM +0100, Christian Seiler wrote: > On 12/21/2016 11:37 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > > When looking at the build log page[1] I realise that vor some architectures > > a Build-Depends is missing but I have no idea why for instance amd64 is > > not bu

Re: Source upload of r-cran-treescape does not build on any architecture - but why?

2016-12-21 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 10:46:37AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > /tmp/apt-dpkg-install-Pz7ptL/116-r-base-core_3.3.2-1_amd64.deb > W: No sandbox user '_apt' on the system, can not drop privileges > E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) > apt-get failed. > > so, unless you

Re: Source upload of r-cran-treescape does not build on any architecture - but why?

2016-12-21 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
> > >I did a source upload of r-cran-treescape at 2016-12-19 21:51:35. > >When looking at the build log page[1] I realise that vor some architectures >a Build-Depends is missing but I have no idea why for instance amd64 is >not build after > 36 hours. clicking on "logs" shows a lot of failed att

Re: Source upload of r-cran-treescape does not build on any architecture - but why?

2016-12-21 Thread Christian Seiler
On 12/21/2016 11:37 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > I did a source upload of r-cran-treescape at 2016-12-19 21:51:35. > > When looking at the build log page[1] I realise that vor some architectures > a Build-Depends is missing but I have no idea why for instance amd64 is > not build after > 36 hours. >

Source upload of r-cran-treescape does not build on any architecture - but why?

2016-12-21 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, I did a source upload of r-cran-treescape at 2016-12-19 21:51:35. When looking at the build log page[1] I realise that vor some architectures a Build-Depends is missing but I have no idea why for instance amd64 is not build after > 36 hours. Any ideas? Kind regards Andreas. [1] http

Bug#848867: RFS: xalan/1.11-6

2016-12-21 Thread Bill Blough
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 07:05:52AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi > > > a quick look seems to show a progress when removing debian/autoreconf file. > http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/xalan/1.11-6.1/buildlog > G. Yes, it looks like using debian/autoreconf with --s