Your message dated Thu, 15 Dec 2016 04:29:20 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: usbguard/0.6.2+ds1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #847792,
regarding RFS: usbguard/0.6.2+ds1-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
control: severity -1 important
control: tag -1 +moreinfo
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 05:12:31AM +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> Changes since last upload:
>
> [ Sean Whitton ]
> * Team upload.
> * Fix Vcs-* URIs.
You should delete the "Team upload" line since the person who signed off
the chang
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "evil-el"
* Package name: evil-el
Version : 1.2.12-2
Upstream Author : Vegard Øye
* Url : https://bitbucket.org/lyro/evil/wiki/Home
* Licenses: GPL-3+,GF
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "eoconv"
* Package name: eoconv
Version : 1.4-2
Upstream Author : Tristan Miller
* Url : http://en.nothingisreal.com/wiki/Eoconv
* Licenses: GPL-3+
Sec
Control: tag -1 + pending
Hi,
Muri Nicanor wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "usbguard"
[…]
> https://mentors.debian.net/package/usbguard
Looks fine to me. Will upload soon.
Thanks for maintaining usbguard in Debian!
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Becker
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 05:06:39AM +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> I received reply from upstream, so now version is oficially 1.0.0. One
> more review, please.
You need `dch -r`. Otherwise, cab58bc0530e73165bf01d66a37966d08ca26280
LGTM.
> About d/watch -- seems I used old version of dh-make-elp
On 14 December 2016 at 16:44, Christian Seiler wrote:
| Hi,
|
| On 12/14/2016 04:16 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > One quick thought: does it die in _compilation_ which we have seen with
other
| > (C++-heavy) packages?
|
| No, g++ works fine here. (The C++ file itself is trivial if you
| look
Your message dated Thu, 15 Dec 2016 00:15:08 +0500
with message-id <20161214191508.5zjrcpdlnf7nx...@belkar.wrar.name>
and subject line Re: Bug#847709: RFS: kildclient/3.1.0-1 [update of package
already in Debian]
has caused the Debian Bug report #847709,
regarding RFS: kildclient/3.1.0-1 [update o
Your message dated Thu, 15 Dec 2016 00:09:04 +0500
with message-id <20161214190904.khdu5h6xjibd7...@belkar.wrar.name>
and subject line Re: Bug#848074: RFS: inspircd/2.0.23-1.1 [RC, NMU]
has caused the Debian Bug report #848074,
regarding RFS: inspircd/2.0.23-2 [RC]
to be marked as done.
This means
Uploaded, thanks.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
On 14-12-2016 14:34, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 05:35:19PM -0200, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
>> * control: kildclient-doc is marked as Multi-Arch: foreign since it
>> consists only of static documentation.
> Actually kildclient is marked,
Andrey Rahmatullin wrote...
> If you are a team member then you should do a team upload, not a NMU.
Um, rright. Updated debdiff attached.
Christoph
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Christoph Biedl wrote...
> Updated debdiff attached.
Now really attached.
Christoph
diff -Nru inspircd-2.0.23/debian/changelog inspircd-2.0.23/debian/changelog
--- inspircd-2.0.23/debian/changelog2016-09-06 00:04:38.0 +0200
+++ inspircd-2.0.23/debian/changelog2016-12-12 23:48
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 06:48:24PM +0100, Andreas Moog wrote:
> It doesn't in unstable currently:
FWIW, after the upload of python-requests version 2.12.3-1, python-pyvo is
installable again.
--
PGP-encrypted mails preferred
PGP Fingerprint: 74CD D9FE 5BCB FE0D 13EE 8EEA 61F3 4426 74DE 6624
s
Tested on partch, uploaded. Thanks!
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Your message dated Wed, 14 Dec 2016 22:20:01 +0500
with message-id <20161214172001.djcybh5cbdulh...@belkar.wrar.name>
and subject line Re: Bug#848151: RFS: nfft/3.3.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #848151,
regarding RFS: nfft/3.3.2-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
On 14-12-2016 13:36, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> Please remove extra empty lines from the changelog entry.
> Why did you enable DH_VERBOSE=1?
>
Already fixed.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Standards-Version = 3.6.8? (debian/changelog)
2016-12-14 14:36 GMT-02:00 Andrey Rahmatullin :
> Please remove extra empty lines from the changelog entry.
> Why did you enable DH_VERBOSE=1?
>
> --
> WBR, wRAR
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nfft"
* Package name: nfft
Version : 3.3.2-2
Upstream Author : Prof. Dr. Daniel Potts
* URL : http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~potts/nfft/
* License : GPL-2
control: reopen -1
I have pushed a new version on mentors:
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-cartopy/python-c
artopy_0.14.2+dfsg1-1.dsc
Would you be happy to sponsor it Gianfranco?
Cheers,
Ghis
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Control: owner -1 !
On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 05:35:19PM -0200, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> * control: kildclient-doc is marked as Multi-Arch: foreign since it
> consists only of static documentation.
Actually kildclient is marked, not kildclient-doc.
--
WBR, wR
Please remove extra empty lines from the changelog entry.
Why did you enable DH_VERBOSE=1?
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 08:35:41PM +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for a NMU of the "inspircd" package, as I
> happen to be a member of the Debian IRC team but (still) lack upload
> permission to handle the RC bug it is currently affected with on my own.
If you are a team
I don't see the nmudiff at #846698.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "restic".
Note that it needs golang-github-minio-minio-go/2.0.2-1 to build (#847350: RFS:
golang-github-minio-minio-go/2.0.2-1).
restic - backup program with multiple revisions, encryption
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 04:44:18PM +0100, Willem Vermin wrote:
> Package is native, because the Debian package source is identical to the
> pristine source.
This is bad. Imagine someone else becomes the Debian maintainer. Also,
with native packages you need to make another upstream release with eac
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 10:48:32PM +, Jan Wedekind wrote:
> > Other problems:
> > - the package doesn't build in a clean sid chroot:
> > not ok 19 - Check a pixel in the first video frame of the video (ERROR: In
> > procedure #f: Wrong type (expecting ffmpeg): #)
> > FAIL: test_ffmpeg.scm 19 -
Hi,
On 12/14/2016 04:16 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> One quick thought: does it die in _compilation_ which we have seen with other
> (C++-heavy) packages?
No, g++ works fine here. (The C++ file itself is trivial if you
look at it.)
Current package in Debian:
http://sources.debian.net/src/r-cra
On 14 December 2016 at 15:59, Andreas Tille wrote:
| Hi Christian,
|
| thanks a lot for your extensive analysis about of the stack problem. I
| admit I have no idea why this large stack is needed on those
| architectures with stable kernel. I also have no idea why everything
| went fine with tr
Hi Andreas,
On 12/14/2016 03:59 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> thanks a lot for your extensive analysis about of the stack problem. I
> admit I have no idea why this large stack is needed on those
> architectures with stable kernel. I also have no idea why everything
> went fine with treescape versi
Dmitry, Gianfranco,
Are you OK with the package in the current form? Could you sponsor it? The
sooner it hits sid, the sooner I can submit a RFS for restic.
Thanks!
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi Christian,
thanks a lot for your extensive analysis about of the stack problem. I
admit I have no idea why this large stack is needed on those
architectures with stable kernel. I also have no idea why everything
went fine with treescape version 1.10.17. Since I personally fell
totally cluele
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Why is the package native? Policy (5.6.12) says it's for the cases when
"a piece of software was written specifically to be a Debian package,
where the Debian package source must always be identical to the pristine
source and therefore no revision indication is required
Hi again,
On 12/14/2016 03:00 PM, Christian Seiler wrote:
> If I had to guess what was going on in the backtrace, I'd suspect
> an infinite recursion in R code, which translates to infinite
> recursion of the underlying C code. But I'm really not sure here.
Interestingly enough, my initial guess
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "findent":
* Package name: findent
Version : 2.7.3
Upstream Author : Willem Vermin wver...@gmail.com
* URL : findent.sourceforge.net
* Licence : BSD-3
Section : development
Hi Andreas,
On 12/14/2016 11:47 AM, Christian Seiler wrote:
> On 12/14/2016 08:50 AM, Christian Seiler wrote:
>> I'm going to try an i386 build in a VM running a stable kernel
>> and see if that does indeed change things and if I can reproduce
>> the problem. Should that not be the issue though th
Your message dated Wed, 14 Dec 2016 13:30:35 + (UTC)
with message-id <1994898952.4680419.1481722235...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#848093: RFS: manpages-zh/1.5.4.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #848093,
regarding RFS: manpages-zh/1.5.4.1-1
to be marked as done.
This means tha
On 2016-12-14 18:06+0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 02:00:30PM +0100, Félix Sipma wrote:
>> Version: 1.1.15-1.0
> ITYM 1.1.15-0.1
OK, package updated.
dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rdup/rdup_1.1.15-0.1.dsc
signature.asc
Description: PGP sig
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 02:00:30PM +0100, Félix Sipma wrote:
> Version: 1.1.15-1.0
ITYM 1.1.15-0.1
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for a NMU of "rdup". I contacted the maintainer
(js...@debian.org) two weeks ago about this NMU, but he did not answered me.
rdup - utility to create a file list suitable for making backups
Package: rdup
2016-12-14 19:20 GMT+08:00 Gianfranco Costamagna :
> d/compat <-- still "9"
>
> this is why you didn't drop "--with autoreconf" from rules file, right?
> (please drop it)
Yes. Problem solved.
>
>
> debian/copyright.old seems useless, right?
Initially I wanted to keep it inside the source package
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "rear". Previous RFS was
sponsored but got rejected by ftpmasters because one file was not DFSG
compliant (this documentation file was removed in current packaging and
source code was repacked
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
>manpages-zh - Chinese manual pages
lets see, even if I don't speak such language, changes seems about
packaging:
d/compat <-- still "9"
this is why you didn't drop "--with autoreconf" from rules file, right?
(please drop it)
debian/copyrigh
Your message dated Wed, 14 Dec 2016 11:09:11 + (UTC)
with message-id <433760594.4505948.1481713751...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#847426: RFS: fortune-zh/2.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #847426,
regarding RFS: fortune-zh/2.0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Hi,
Uploaded updated fortune-zh package to mentors:
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fortune-zh/fortune-zh_2.0.dsc
The changes I've made can be viewed here:
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/chinese/fortune-zh.git/log/
(the latest 3 commits)
Buildlog is good although DoM-amd64 seems
Hi Andreas,
On 12/14/2016 08:50 AM, Christian Seiler wrote:
> I'm going to try an i386 build in a VM running a stable kernel
> and see if that does indeed change things and if I can reproduce
> the problem. Should that not be the issue though then I really
> can't reproduce the problem - and hence
On 2016-12-13 07:59+1100, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> On Monday, 12 December 2016 11:09:56 AM AEDT Félix Sipma wrote:
>> From gbp-dch(1):
>>
>> --id-length=N
>> Include N digits of the commit id in the
>> changelog entry. Default is to not include
>> an
On 14/12/16 08:36, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
control: reopen -1
Package python-cartopy has been removed from mentors.
lets wait a little more
G.
Yes, there is a new upstream version available to I'll have to refresh
the current packaging with it.
I'll ping you when done.
Cheers,
G
Your message dated Wed, 14 Dec 2016 08:34:09 + (UTC)
with message-id <1450281808.4278429.1481704449...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#847978: RFS: patat/0.4.5.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #847978,
regarding RFS: patat/0.4.5.0-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
control: reopen -1
>Package python-cartopy has been removed from mentors.
lets wait a little more
G.
50 matches
Mail list logo
