Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: a...@debian.org, as...@debian.org, 073p...@gmail.com
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fortune-zh"
* Package name: fortune-zh
Version : 2.0
Upstream Author : myself
* URL : http:
Hi Gianfranco!
2016-10-31 11:56 GMT-05:00 Gianfranco Costamagna
:
> control: owner -1 !
> control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> Hi,
>
>>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "glances"
>
>
> missing licenses and copyrights:
> e.g.
>
> +++ glances-2.7.1.1/.ci/appveyor/install.ps12016-09-18 21:06:28.
Hi Gianfranco,
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Sean Whitton wrote:
> You don't need to: just provide Gianfranco with a tarball to upload, or
> tell him how to produce it from your git repository.
Thanks for your advice.
Could you upload my package with following? > Gianfranco
https://mentors.d
Dear Sean,
Thank you once again for holding me to high standards and for taking
the time to point out what needs work!
1-to-5, and 8: done
>
> 6. In d/NEWS,
>
> > Unfortunately, it is not possible to distribute this manual with the
> > muse-el Debian package because the Debian project has chosen
Dear Kiwamu,
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 10:22:00AM +0900, Kiwamu Okabe wrote:
> Could you advice me how to use the command in this situation?
You don't need to: just provide Gianfranco with a tarball to upload, or
tell him how to produce it from your git repository.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Hi all,
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Sean Whitton wrote:
>> verilog-mode (master) $ gbp buildpackage -S -d
>> gbp:warning: Pristine-tar branch "pristine-tar" not found
>> gbp:error: Pristine-tar couldn't checkout
>> "verilog-mode_20161124.fd230e6.orig.tar.gz": pristine-tar: no pristine-tar
>
Onsdag den 7:e december 2016, klockan 23:38, skrev Gianfranco Costamagna detta:
>
> >> please use a text-version of the signing-key and avoid the
> >> include-binaries file?
> >
> >Then I need education on the procedure to create a keyring file on the go,
> >since gpgv only handles keyrings, not
Hello,
is it possible to convert a debian package trigger into systemd unit file?
Best regards,
Patrick
Hello,
a script in my debian/pkg.triggers depends on another package's systemd
unit being active.
[If both packages are upgraded, the other packages's systed unit file is
stopped while my package's trigger depends on it. Hence fails.]
Is it possible to delay my package's trigger until the other
control: reopen -1
control: noowner -1
control: tag -1 -moreinfo
Dear Ben,
Thank you for your renewed interest in this ITP.
The deadline for getting new packages into stretch is fast approaching,
and I won't be able to throughly examine your work until late next week
at the earliest. For this r
Hello,
On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 11:46:19PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> verilog-mode (master) $ gbp buildpackage -S -d
> gbp:warning: Pristine-tar branch "pristine-tar" not found
> gbp:error: Pristine-tar couldn't checkout
> "verilog-mode_20161124.fd230e6.orig.tar.gz": pristine-tar: no pr
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi
>I consider git revision 4ba937fbc958fb5037e65fe351d18f2da8e0b988 ready
>for upload.
>
>Thank you for your patience, Kiwamu.
tarball?
verilog-mode (master) $ gbp buildpackage -S -d
gbp:warning: Pristine-tar branch "pristine-tar" not found
gbp:err
Hi
>> please use a text-version of the signing-key and avoid the include-binaries
>> file?
>
>
>Then I need education on the procedure to create a keyring file on the go,
>since gpgv only handles keyrings, not armoured keyfiles.
https://wiki.debian.org/debian/watch#Cryptographic_signature_ver
Hello there!
Onsdag den 7:e december 2016, klockan 15:56, skrev Gianfranco Costamagna detta:
> >
> >+ debian/upstream/signing-key.pgp: New file.
> >+ debian/source/include-binaries: New file.
>
> please use a text-version of the signing-key and avoid the include-binaries
> file?
Then I
control: tag -1 -moreinfo +confirmed
control: noowner -1
I consider git revision 4ba937fbc958fb5037e65fe351d18f2da8e0b988 ready
for upload.
Thank you for your patience, Kiwamu.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Dear Sean,
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 12:42 AM, Sean Whitton wrote:
>> I think "Forwarded: no" is valid, because
>> http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/ say following:
>
> Right, but the convention is that "no" means "I should forward this but
> I haven't forwarded it yet" and "not-needed" means "this sh
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nlohmann-json"
* Package name: nlohmann-json
Version : 2.0.6-1
Upstream Author : Niels Lohmann
* Url : https://nlohmann.github.io/json/
* Licenses: Apache
Hello Sean,
Thank you for taking the time to review this package. I have addressed much
of the feedback that you have provided, as well as upgraded the package to the
latest Chapel release, 1.14.0.
An easily-browsable version of the source package contents can be here:
https://github.com/be
Ok thank you :) Let's do this! I will contact the maintainer and hope he
will respond and help me to start.
On Wednesday, 7 December 2016 6:52:04 PM AEDT Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> ...in this case there is no license/copyright issue, at least I can't
> see it
So we are not discussing a generic issue? This particular package did not
have DFSG-repackaging to begin with nor does it need one... :)
For
Your message dated Wed, 7 Dec 2016 19:04:51 + (UTC)
with message-id <1964915285.2521778.1481137491...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#847386: RFS: libwnck/2.30.7-5.1 (RC, NMU)
has caused the Debian Bug report #847386,
regarding RFS: libwnck/2.30.7-5.1 (RC, NMU)
to be marked as done.
T
Your message dated Wed, 7 Dec 2016 19:02:37 + (UTC)
with message-id <315993679.2520074.1481137357...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#847383: RFS: pm/0.32-1.2 (RC, NMU)
has caused the Debian Bug report #847383,
regarding RFS: pm/0.32-1.2 (RC, NMU)
to be marked as done.
This means that
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package "libwnck"
* Package name: libwnck
Version : 2.30.7-5.1
Section : libs
It builds those binary packages:
gir1.2-wnck-1.0 - GObject introspection data for the WNC
Hi again :)
>
>I think "ds" is quite confusing let alone that it matches my initials. ;)
lol
>IMHO DFSG-repacking fits all cases even when we throw away useless files to
>avoid documenting their copyrights. Often you just don't know whether
>excluded content is DFSG compliant or not. And sinc
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cpm"
* Package name: cpm
Version : 0.32-1.2
Section : utils
It builds those binary packages:
cpm - Curses based password manager using PGP-encryption
It fi
On Wednesday, 7 December 2016 6:02:33 PM AEDT Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> repacking to drop bundled dependencies is sometimes called ds (Debian
> Source) repack, non dfsg (even if nobody ever wrote some documentation for
> this).
I think "ds" is quite confusing let alone that it matches my init
Your message dated Wed, 07 Dec 2016 18:27:38 +
with message-id <1481135258.30098.8.ca...@gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#847375: RFS: forge/0.9.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #847375,
regarding RFS: forge/0.9.0-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Hi Dmitry,
>I believe that should be fairly obvious that we repack to drop all bundled
>dependencies. That's Golang for you where it is common to incorporate all
>dependency libraries into tarball. Throwing away private copies of those
>libraries is important to avoid using 'em accidentally,
On Wednesday, 7 December 2016 2:13:08 PM AEDT Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> what is the reason for the repack? non-dfsg files?
> if it is just to skip some tests, I really prefer a debian/clean target,
> and not a repack of the whole source tarball.
> diverging from upstream tarballs has a lot of
On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 05:43:26PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Note: this particular package has an RC bug (Fails To Build From Source), so
> you should start by fixing that one, because otherwise
> you won't be able to build it :)
Also, it's removed from testing and we are approaching t
Hi,
>I'm Vincent Carluer, a senior dev but a newbie with Debian dev/packaging.
>But I really want to contribute to this great project !
thanks for your interest :)
>It does not seems really easy to start with it but I think I have found a
>package which seems not to big, can be fun for me to m
On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 06:33:25PM +0100, Vincent Carluer wrote:
> I'm Vincent Carluer, a senior dev but a newbie with Debian dev/packaging.
> But I really want to contribute to this great project !
Glad to hear this :)
Please consider joining #debian-mentors on irc.debian.org and use this ML
only
Hello,
I'm Vincent Carluer, a senior dev but a newbie with Debian dev/packaging.
But I really want to contribute to this great project !
It does not seems really easy to start with it but I think I have found a
package which seems not to big, can be fun for me to maintain and which
suits my skill
Hi,
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "forge":
*happily* sponsored :)
G.
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "forge":
* Package name: forge
Version : 0.9.0-2
Upstream Author : ArrayFire
* URL : https://github.com/arrayfire/forge
* License : BSD
Section : l
Your message dated Wed, 07 Dec 2016 16:26:59 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: openbox/3.6.1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #841017,
regarding RFS: openbox/3.6.1-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Your message dated Wed, 7 Dec 2016 16:26:00 + (UTC)
with message-id <296479808.2364146.1481127960...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#847350: RFS: golang-github-minio-minio-go/2.0.2+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #847350,
regarding RFS: golang-github-minio-minio-go/2.0.2-1
to b
Your message dated Wed, 7 Dec 2016 16:08:39 + (UTC)
with message-id <980037179.2333835.1481126919...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#846974: RFS: bit-babbler/0.6~bpo8+1
has caused the Debian Bug report #846974,
regarding RFS: bit-babbler/0.6~bpo8+1
to be marked as done.
This means tha
Your message dated Wed, 7 Dec 2016 16:03:01 + (UTC)
with message-id <1402720840.2332409.1481126581...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#846973: RFS: sndio/1.1.0-3~bpo8+1
has caused the Debian Bug report #846973,
regarding RFS: sndio/1.1.0-3~bpo8+1
to be marked as done.
This means that y
On 2016-12-07 16:06+0100, Félix Sipma wrote:
> On 2016-12-07 14:13+, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>> control: owner -1 !
>> control: tags -1 moreinfo
>>>I am looking for a sponsor for "golang-github-minio-minio-go":
>>
>>>2.0.2 is needed to complete the packaging of restic (ITP #846176).
>>
>
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
>I am looking for a sponsor of the package "rush":
>
>+ debian/upstream/signing-key.pgp: New file.
>+ debian/source/include-binaries: New file.
please use a text-version of the signing-key and avoid the include-binaries
file?
G.
Dear Kiwamu,
On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 01:48:37PM +0900, Kiwamu Okabe wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Sean Whitton wrote:
> > Looks good, but you need "Forwarded: not-needed" not "Forwarded: no".
>
> I think "Forwarded: no" is valid, because
> http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/ say followin
On 2016-12-07 14:13+, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> control: owner -1 !
> control: tags -1 moreinfo
>>I am looking for a sponsor for "golang-github-minio-minio-go":
>
>>2.0.2 is needed to complete the packaging of restic (ITP #846176).
>
> I would like to see it sponsored by the maintainer,
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "groonga"
missing copyrights:
Roman Arutyunyan
Ruslan Ermilov
Maxim Dounin
Valentin V. Bartenev
Unbit S.a.s. 2009-2010
Vlad Krasnov
Sergey A. Osokin
Austin Appleby
Manlio Perillo
Scott James Remnant
2012-201
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "engauge-digitizer"
sigh:
Binary files
/tmp/B972iVgMET/engauge-digitizer-9.3/dev/windows/appveyor/fftw-3.3.5-dll32.zip
and
/tmp/TUNKzqq_Ua/engauge-digitizer-9.7/dev/windows/appveyor/fftw-3.3.5-dll32.z
Your message dated Wed, 7 Dec 2016 14:45:47 + (UTC)
with message-id <90863864.2126510.1481121947...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#847070: RFS: patat/0.4.4.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #847070,
regarding RFS: patat/0.4.4.0-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Hi Adam,
>In light of the recently announced forced 10-day migration delay after
>Dec 5 and the soft freeze on Jan 5, I would like to move forward with
>the proposed changes so the package is in shape for stretch.
>
>Adam, I do not wish to take over poppassd. If you could sponsor one
>or two upl
Your message dated Wed, 7 Dec 2016 14:28:35 + (UTC)
with message-id <726620182.2073667.1481120915...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#847228: RFS: ipband/0.8.1-5 -- mostly spelling mistakes
has caused the Debian Bug report #847228,
regarding RFS: ipband/0.8.1-5 -- mostly spelling mistak
Hi,
>Bug#839383: RFS: php-net-idna2/0.1.1-1 [ITP]
in new queue
>Bug#842157: RFS: php-db-dataobject/1.11.5-1 [ITP] -- PHP PEAR module for
>object based SQL query building
in testing :)
Will probably look at gnu-social once the new queue is cleared.
G.
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
>I am looking for a sponsor for "golang-github-minio-minio-go":
>2.0.2 is needed to complete the packaging of restic (ITP #846176).
I would like to see it sponsored by the maintainer, but here something I'm
worried
about:
what is the reason for the
Your message dated Wed, 7 Dec 2016 13:57:52 + (UTC)
with message-id <1317419267.2093514.1481119072...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#845472: RFS: openbox/3.6.1-4 [RC]
has caused the Debian Bug report #845472,
regarding RFS: openbox/3.6.1-4 [RC]
to be marked as done.
This means that y
Your message dated Wed, 7 Dec 2016 13:51:20 + (UTC)
with message-id <1170435545.2170691.1481118680...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#841366: RFS: task-spooler/1.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #841366,
regarding RFS: task-spooler/1.0-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Your message dated Wed, 7 Dec 2016 13:47:49 + (UTC)
with message-id <145833544.2090421.1481118469...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#832970: RFS: txwinrm/1.1.28-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #832970,
regarding RFS: txwinrm/1.1.28-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means tha
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for "golang-github-minio-minio-go":
golang-github-minio-minio-go - Go library for Amazon S3 compatible cloud
storage
Package: golang-github-minio-minio-go
Version: 2.0.2+dfsg-1
Upstream Author: Minio, I
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnome-shell-extension-shortcuts"
* Package name: gnome-shell-extension-shortcuts
Version : 1.0.3-1
Upstream Author : Kyle Robbertze
* URL :
https://gitlab.co
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package
"gnome-shell-extension-log-out-button"
* Package name: gnome-shell-extension-log-out-button
Version : 1.0.4-1
Upstream Author : Kyle Robbertze
* URL :
https://gitlab.com/paddatrapper/log-out-button-gnome-exte
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnome-shell-extension-shortcuts"
* Package name: gnome-shell-extension-shortcuts
Version : 1.0.2-1
Upstream Author : Kyle Robbertze
* URL :
https://gitlab.co
57 matches
Mail list logo
