Your message dated Wed, 23 Nov 2016 04:26:56 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: openldap/2.4.44+dfsg-1 [RC]
has caused the Debian Bug report #844577,
regarding RFS: openldap/2.4.44+dfsg-1 [RC]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 5:51 AM, Werner Detter wrote:
> I'll try the source upload. But it's still curious that full
> uploads don't work as expected.
Full uploads work if you don't include the .buildinfo file in the
upload nor the .changes file. I doubt this will be fixed any time
soon.
--
bye
Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2016 22:24:34 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: globjects/1.0.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #845215,
regarding RFS: globjects/1.0.0-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2016 22:24:34 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: gli/0.8.2.0+ds1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #844532,
regarding RFS: gli/0.8.2.0+ds1-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2016 22:24:35 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: open-ath9k-htc-firmware/1.4.0-81-gf206e56+dfsg-1
ITP #751339
has caused the Debian Bug report #840515,
regarding RFS: open-ath9k-htc-firmware/1.4.0-81-gf206e56+dfsg-1 ITP #751339
to be marked as done.
> I've personally never done a full (with binaries) upload to mentors.
a full upload with binaries worked for me for about the last 5 years.
> source-only uploads always worked. The only upside of uploading
> binaries too would be to have them scanned by lintian and the result
> pubblished by t
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:32:15PM +0100, Werner Detter wrote:
> > source-only uploads works, please use them.
>
> Is this "new" or is "something" broken? I'll give it a try with
> source-only uploads.
I've personally never done a full (with binaries) upload to mentors.
source-only uploads always
Hi,
> source-only uploads works, please use them.
Is this "new" or is "something" broken? I'll give it a try with
source-only uploads.
Cheers,
Werner
Hi,
>well it worked _only once_ and only for one of my packages. Now I'm able
>to upload and the packages are listet on ftp://mentors.debian.net
>_but_ they aren't moved to my mentors account. And after some time
>those packages are gone again. Weird. Any comments appreciated.
$ pull-debian-so
Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2016 20:38:21 + (UTC)
with message-id <1837500147.4172246.1479847101...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#838495: RFS: python-cartopy/0.14.2-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #838495,
regarding RFS: python-cartopy/0.14.2+dfsg1-1 [ITP]
to be marked as
> same for me - it worked with ftp-upload.
well it worked _only once_ and only for one of my packages. Now I'm able
to upload and the packages are listet on ftp://mentors.debian.net
_but_ they aren't moved to my mentors account. And after some time
those packages are gone again. Weird. Any comm
Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2016 17:45:17 + (UTC)
with message-id <1428717493.4065797.1479836717...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#844565: RFS: node-husl/6.0.1+dfsg-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #844565,
regarding RFS: node-husl/6.0.1+dfsg-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2016 18:38:39 +0100
with message-id <00c89f87-c4d9-380d-e858-c0bd6b793...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: RFS on ITP: node-jsonfile -- Easily read/write JSON files
in Node.js
has caused the Debian Bug report #841389,
regarding RFS on ITP: node-jsonfile -- Easily rea
Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2016 17:34:27 + (UTC)
with message-id <130120002.3951009.1479836067...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#844769: RFS: node-resumer/0.0.0-1 [RFP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #844769,
regarding RFS: node-resumer/0.0.0-1 [RFP]
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2016 17:26:18 + (UTC)
with message-id <1673243261.3911932.1479835578...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#837476: RFS: willow/0.3.1-1 [ITP #837471]
has caused the Debian Bug report #837476,
regarding RFS: willow/0.3.1-1 [ITP #837471]
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2016 17:30:11 + (UTC)
with message-id <1823603406.3920805.1479835811...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#844995: RFS: node-object-inspect/1.1.0-1 [RFP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #844995,
regarding RFS: node-object-inspect/1.1.0-1 [RFP]
to be marked
Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2016 17:15:55 + (UTC)
with message-id <2031697595.993612.1479834955...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#845074: RFS: node-sourcemap-codec/1.3.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #845074,
regarding RFS: node-sourcemap-codec/1.3.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as do
Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2016 16:35:44 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: pybind11/1.8.1-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #845320,
regarding RFS: pybind11/1.8.1-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
❦ 22 novembre 2016 23:55 +1100, Scott Leggett :
>> dh_installinit should install it if you name it quagga-core.default.
>
> Instead I have just removed /etc/default/quagga from the package because
> it wasn't much use anymore.
You need to use dpkg-maintscript-helper rm_conffile to tell the user
Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2016 15:00:03 + (UTC)
with message-id <1450935929.367940.1479826803...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#845073: RFS: node-text-encoding/0.6.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #845073,
regarding RFS: node-text-encoding/0.6.2-1
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2016 14:58:19 + (UTC)
with message-id <1906058178.3681541.1479826699...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#845076: RFS: node-esprima/3.1.1+ds-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #845076,
regarding RFS: node-esprima/3.1.1+ds-1
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2016 14:56:17 + (UTC)
with message-id <1003696682.3677037.1479826577...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#844482: RFS/ITP: node-vlq/0.2.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #844482,
regarding RFS/ITP: node-vlq/0.2.0-1
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2016 14:57:19 + (UTC)
with message-id <892804522.3670290.1479826639...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#845077: RFS: node-magic-string/0.16.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #845077,
regarding RFS: node-magic-string/0.16.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
control: tags -1 moreinfo
control: owner -1 !
>X-Debbugs-CC: t...@security.debian.org
>Severity: important
please remove moreinfo once security team acked/nacked changes, and I'll do
the upload.
G.
On 2016-11-21.13:56, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 21 novembre 2016 23:39 +1100, Scott Leggett :
>
> >> > * Use systemd .service files rather than init.d scripts (Closes:
> >> > #678946,
> >> > #805840, #839819, #412483).
> >>
> >> I am quite OK with that. You don't have time to sort out tho
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pybind11"
* Package name: pybind11
Version : 1.8.1-1
Upstream Author : Wenzel Jakob
* URL : https://github.com/pybind/pybind11
* License : BSD
Section
Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2016 13:09:26 +0100
with message-id <20161122120926.ga2...@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#843775: jessie-pu: package mdadm/3.3.2-5+deb8u2
has caused the Debian Bug report #845311,
regarding RFS: mdadm/3.3.2-5+deb8u2 [NMU]
to be marked as done.
This means that you
On 2016-11-21.08:11, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2016-11-21 at 07:56, Vincent Bernat wrote:
>
> > ❦ 21 novembre 2016 23:39 +1100, Scott Leggett :
> >> I personally cannot test such init scripts since all my systems now
> >> use systemd, and I can't in good faith include code that I can't
> >> test a
(dropping debian-boot@, adding 845311@)
Hi Jens,
Jens Sauer (2016-11-22):
> Thank you for reviewing this package. It was my first time doing this,
> I hope everything is alright.
It looks to me everything was right on the first attempt. :)
> I opened a RFS to find a sponsor for the upload:
> h
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mdadm"
Package name: mdadm
Version : 3.3.2-5+deb8u2
Upstream Author : Neil Brown
URL : http://neil.brown.name/blog/mdadm
License : GPL
Section : admin
Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2016 11:30:52 +0100
with message-id <20161122103052.ga...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#844242: RFS: terminology/0.9.1-0.1 [RC] [NMU]
has caused the Debian Bug report #844242,
regarding RFS: terminology/0.7.0-2 [RC]
to be marked as done.
This means that you cl
Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2016 10:26:29 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: dynamic-graph/3.0.0-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #822613,
regarding RFS: dynamic-graph/3.0.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Package: sponsorship-requests
X-Debbugs-CC: t...@security.debian.org
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "imagemagick"
* Package name: imagemagick
Version : 8:6.8.9.9-5+deb8u6
Section : graphics
It builds those binary packa
Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2016 08:45:24 + (UTC)
with message-id <547494711.3103532.1479804324...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#844608: RFS: protobuf/3.0.0-7.1 [NMU]
has caused the Debian Bug report #844608,
regarding RFS: protobuf/3.0.0-7.1 [NMU]
to be marked as done.
This mean
Hi,
>I'll check it if I get home - if no one objects against the Python3
>variant of ProtoBuf.
It seemed good to me, but I'm not part of the team.
I just removed the "autoreconf.after autoreconf.before" from debian/clean, they
are useless, and sponsored in deferred/5.
Let me know if it sounds g
Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2016 08:38:59 + (UTC)
with message-id <1272518071.3097750.1479803940...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#845264: RFS: ublock-origin/1.9.16+dfsg-1~bpo8+1
has caused the Debian Bug report #845264,
regarding RFS: ublock-origin/1.9.16+dfsg-1~bpo8+1
to be marke
- Forwarded message from Vincent Bernat -
> Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 13:56:00 +0100
> From: Vincent Bernat
> To: Scott Leggett
> Cc: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Bug#845018: RFS: quagga/1.1.0-1 [ITA] -- network routing daemons
> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/2
Oops, forgot to CC the bug report..
- Forwarded message from Scott Leggett -
> Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 23:39:31 +1100
> From: Scott Leggett
> To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Bug#845018: RFS: quagga/1.1.0-1 [ITA] -- network routing daemons
>
> Hi Vincent,
>
> Thanks f
On 2016-11-21.13:56, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 21 novembre 2016 23:39 +1100, Scott Leggett :
>
> I'll review the changes for tomorrow.
Hi Vincent,
Sorry for this.. there are a couple more changes I'd like to make. If
you haven't begun review already, please wait.
--
Regards,
Scott.
signatu
39 matches
Mail list logo
