Bug#827397: RFS: vlc/2.0.3-5+deb7u3

2016-09-30 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Fri, 30 Sep 2016, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > > The real question is: is this upload ACKed by the LTS team? I don't > > have a hold on LTS workflow, and in my thoughts I believe uploads have > > to be ACKed, pretty much like regular security uploads, and stable > > uploads? > > can we

Bug#839289: RFS: pnmixer/0.7-1 [ITP] -- Simple mixer application for system tray

2016-09-30 Thread Arnaud Rébillout
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pnmixer" * Package name: pnmixer Version : 0.7-1 Upstream Author : Nick Lanham, Julian Ospald, Arnaud Rébillout * URL : https://github.com/nicklan/pnmixer *

Bug#832941: RFS: 4pane (debian: message 7 of 20)

2016-09-30 Thread David Hart
Dear Sean, Many thanks for taking the time to write such a detailed review. Of the must-fixes: >1. The changelog should contain exactly one entry, closing the ITP. Ah, that not only makes sense but is easier. Done. >2. Why doesn't 4pane work on archs other than i386, amd64, hurd-i386? I didn't t

Bug#837650: RFS: cf-python/1.3.1+dfsg.1-1 [ITP]

2016-09-30 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 09/30/2016 02:46 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > "the netcdf package. There was an ITP for the netcdf-libcf package, but > development of this source upstream is stalled. > > cf-python depends on netcdf-python being packaged first, and will be > maintained > within the Debian GIS team." >

Bug#837650: RFS: cf-python/1.3.1+dfsg.1-1 [ITP]

2016-09-30 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
control: tags -1 moreinfo control: owner -1 ! > Since the package has been moved to the Python Modules team, finding a > sponsor within the team is your best option. Please contact > debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org as documented in the Python Modules Team > policy: > I'm member of Python Modules

Bug#827397: RFS: vlc/2.0.3-5+deb7u3

2016-09-30 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi Raphael, > The real question is: is this upload ACKed by the LTS team? I don't > have a hold on LTS workflow, and in my thoughts I believe uploads have > to be ACKed, pretty much like regular security uploads, and stable > uploads? > can we please have an ack/nack about this VLC security upda

Bug#839215: marked as done (RFS: dh-haskell/0.3.1 )

2016-09-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 30 Sep 2016 08:44:11 + (UTC) with message-id <35064578.2151878.1475225051...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#839215: RFS: dh-haskell/0.3.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #839215, regarding RFS: dh-haskell/0.3.1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#839215: RFS: dh-haskell/0.3.1

2016-09-30 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dh-haskell" * Package name: dh-haskell Version : 0.3.1 Upstream Author : Dmitry Bogatov * Url : https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-haskell/dh-haskell.git * Lic