Am Mittwoch, den 08.06.2016, 11:59 +0100 schrieb Jerome BENOIT:
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> On 08/06/16 10:40, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > > May I fill an ITA or something to signify that someone to working
> >
> > > the [surface] evolver package ?
> >
> > A bug with patches sh
Your message dated Thu, 9 Jun 2016 06:20:52 + (UTC)
with message-id <762119202.14969.1465453252783.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#826134: RFS: libvpd/2.2.5-1 ITP: libvpd -- VPD
Database access library
has caused the Debian Bug report #826134,
regarding RFS: libvpd/2.2.
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "groonga"
Hi, I did a debdiff between them, and I see some changes that might be ABI
breaking the library:
-GRN_API grn_rc grn_timeval_now(grn_ctx *ctx, grn_timeval *tv);
-GRN_API grn_rc grn_timeval
Mo Zhou writes:
> (Keep me in CC list please)
Done.
> I'm working on some packages whose upstream (github) doesn't make
> releases. So I need to invent upstream versions, that's OK.
Can you appeal to upstream to make releases? The Upstream Guide
https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamGuide#Releases_a
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "arc-theme"
* Package name: arc-theme
Version : 20160605-1
Upstream Author : horst3180
* URL : https://github.com/horst3180/arc-theme
* License
Your message dated Wed, 8 Jun 2016 14:21:35 + (UTC)
with message-id <1015353345.843413.1465395695178.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#826724: RFS: pyoperators/0.13.11-1 [RC]
has caused the Debian Bug report #826724,
regarding RFS: pyoperators/0.13.11-1 [RC]
to be marked a
Hello!
On 08/06/16 09:13 AM, Mo Zhou wrote:
> I read all the uscan examples, and it seems that uscan
> works basing on http and ftp only. That is to say uscan
> will not scan Git repos so the above demand won't be
> satisfied.
`man uscan` will tell you that there is a `git mode`. Unfortunately,
t
Hi folks,
(Keep me in CC list please)
I'm working on some packages whose upstream (github)
doesn't make releases. So I need to invent upstream
versions, that's OK. However when one is going to
maintain a number of packages that watch is not present,
upstream update tracking by hand would be a nig
Hi,
>Right now the package rocks.
>But the upstream version is (very) old, and the Debian package material
>clearly needs some refreshment. Is a patch really appropriate here ?
>May I rather wait for clear orphaning instead ?
I see (2.30 VS 2.70)...
what about:
gbp import-dscs --debsnap git-imp
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pyoperators"
* Package name: pyoperators
Version : 0.13.11-1
Upstream Author : Pierre Chanial
* URL : http://pchanial.github.io/pyoperators/
* License :
Thanks for the reply.
On 08/06/16 10:40, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> May I fill an ITA or something to signify that someone to working
>
>> the [surface] evolver package ?
>
> A bug with patches should be enough, ITA means somebody orphaning the package
> and only the maintainer/MIA
Hi,
>May I fill an ITA or something to signify that someone to working
>the [surface] evolver package ?
A bug with patches should be enough, ITA means somebody orphaning the package
and only the maintainer/MIA team can do it.
But a bug with patches and you proposing the maintainership is someth
Hi Jakub,
thank you for your comments.
On 05/06/2016 13:35, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> In #825236, Giulio asked me about uploading phonetisaurus to unstable.
> If I were the maintainer, I would hesitate to make such upload until the
> following is done:
>
> * 1001_fix_binaries_return_values.pat
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-scie...@lists.debian.org, a...@debian.org
Dear mentors,
This package is the very core part of "Torch", a
state-of-the-art machine learning framework.
Note, this package requires luajit from experimental,
and the basic
Hi,
On 08/06/16 09:51, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
>> i am maintaining many packages, which were maintained by Adam
>> originally. But all of them are team-maintained (Debian Science),
>> and this one is not.
>>
>> AFAIK Adam is not active in Debian last several years. From my
>>
Hi,
>i am maintaining many packages, which were maintained by Adam
>originally. But all of them are team-maintained (Debian Science), and this
>one is not.
>
>AFAIK Adam is not active in Debian last several years. From my point of
>view, it will not be too offensive, if evolver will be moved und
Although we do have a unsolved
issue due to the ambiguity when there are more than one concrete
implementations in a package repository. This means we can't simply
install high-level application packages and have apt-get resolve all
their dependencies automatically, as the packages for the specif
17 matches
Mail list logo
