On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Sean Whitton wrote:
> - you might consider using "GNU/Linux" instead of "Linux" in the package
> description, since Debian identifies itself as a "GNU/Linux"
> distribution
Debian no longer identifies itself as "Debian GNU/Linux" but just
"Debian", due to the
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Hey dear mentors!
I'm looking for a sponsor for my package "libretro-bsnes-mercury"
This is the libretro port of bsnes-mercury, a SNES / Super Nintendo emulator.
bsnes-mercury is a fork of higan, aiming to restore some useful features
that have
e above and I'll have another look!
cheers,
G.
Il Martedì 31 Maggio 2016 13:45, Roger Shimizu ha
scritto:
Control: retitle -1 RFS: shadowsocks-libev/2.4.6+20160531+ds-1 [ITP]
Since there're a few improvements of upstream:
- Merged one of my patch in debian/patches/
- Made upstream Ch
Your message dated Tue, 31 May 2016 20:12:47 + (UTC)
with message-id <1643989773.4264165.1464725567210.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#825965: RFS: gtk3-nocsd/3-1 [RC]
has caused the Debian Bug report #825965,
regarding RFS: gtk3-nocsd/3-1 [RC]
to be marked as done.
Thi
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi, I did a quick look and the package looks great!
(I grabbed it from mentors)
however I have some things I would like to discuss / see fixed:
1) W: libcork source: debian-watch-file-should-mangle-version line 7
2) lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gtk3-nocsd":
* Package name: gtk3-nocsd
Version : 3-1
Upstream Author : Hong Jen Yee (PCMan)
* URL : https://github.com/PCMan/gtk3-nocsd
* License
* Giulio Paci , 2016-05-31, 16:18:
I implemented a workaround that sets different limits for the build
phase and the check phase.
I like the idea. :-)
1eca96b4700b uploaded.
--
Jakub Wilk
Your message dated Tue, 31 May 2016 16:50:02 +
with message-id <20160531165000.gg21...@chase.mapreri.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#825943: RFS: node-jsesc/2.1.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #825943,
regarding RFS: node-jsesc/2.1.0-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-jsesc"
* Package name: node-jsesc
Version : 2.1.0-1
Upstream Author : Mathias Bynens
* URL : http://mths.be/jsesc
* License : Expat
Sectio
Hi,
python-skimage should be RC free now (if no other RC bugs are opened of course
:) )
let me know when you have updates,
G.
> >I upgraded dh-exec from jessie to sid, and it started to work.
>
> This is probably #801516.
>
> Anyway, if replaced "${RUNIT}" with "runit-*" in the *.install file, you
> wouldn't need dh-exec at all.
In some cases I need renaming feature, but thank you for advice.
--
Accept: text/plain, te
On 31/05/2016 11:52, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Giulio Paci , 2016-05-31, 09:33:
>> I just checked the building status of openfst and noticed failures on arm
>> architectures and on kfreebsd-amd64.
>>
>> On arm it seems to me that a timeout occurred,
>
> One suspicious thing I found in armhf build log
* Dmitry Bogatov , 2016-05-31, 14:15:
I can't reproduce it here:
$ grep -B1 html debian/*.install
#!/usr/bin/dh-exec
${RUNIT}/doc/*[a-z].html /usr/share/doc/runit/html
$ dpkg-buildpackage && dpkg -c ../runit_2.1.2-4_amd64.deb | grep /html/
...
I upgraded dh-exec from jessie to sid, and it
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 05:13:14PM +1000, Scott Leggett wrote:
> On 2016-05-30.21:22, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > On Mon, 30 May 2016 20:25:56 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> >
> > > > c) Something else ...?
> > > As both unclutters provide generally the same functionality, you may also
> > > use t
Your message dated Tue, 31 May 2016 12:22:19 + (UTC)
with message-id <1586048852.3737668.1464697339424.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#825904: RFS: python-model-mommy/1.2.6-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #825904,
regarding RFS: python-model-mommy/1.2.6-1
to be marked
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi, I can sponsor the package, lets see what needs fixing/answering:
setup.py/install_requires is your friend, please use it, and drop
the hardcoded runtime-dependencies using python:Depends
(and check if everything is good)
build and run:
$ comitup
T
Thanks for the feedback.
The build is picking up the python-six and django dependencies.
Package: python-model-mommy
Depends: python-django, python-six, python:any (<< 2.8), python:any (>=
2.7.5-5~)
Package: python3-model-mommy
Depends: python3-django, python3-six, python3:any (>= 3.3.2-2~)
I
Control: retitle -1 RFS: shadowsocks-libev/2.4.6+20160531+ds-1 [ITP]
Since there're a few improvements of upstream:
- Merged one of my patch in debian/patches/
- Made upstream Changelog out of debian/ folder, so as one lintian info is gone.
I update the version to latest commit in upstrea
> * Dmitry Bogatov , 2016-05-31, 13:15:
> > $ git clone -b demonstrate
> > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/kaction-guest/runit.git/
> >
> >Glob in 'runit.install'. Try to build package, and notice, that no html
> >files installed at all.
>
> I can't reproduce it here:
>
> $ grep -B1 htm
hi mattia,
umh? So, I read a bit the manpage, this was enough.
IMHO, you gave up way too early, and I really much don't like it.
well, thanks for your patience. i did think that i had possibly figured
out the correct way to do it, but i wasn't sure. it can be hard to tell
if you've done som
On 2016-05-30.21:22, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Mon, 30 May 2016 20:25:56 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
>
> > > c) Something else ...?
> > As both unclutters provide generally the same functionality, you may also
> > use the "alternatives" method.
>
> My impression is that the "new" version ha
* Dmitry Bogatov , 2016-05-31, 13:15:
$ git clone -b demonstrate
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/kaction-guest/runit.git/
Glob in 'runit.install'. Try to build package, and notice, that no html
files installed at all.
I can't reproduce it here:
$ grep -B1 html debian/*.install
#!/usr
> * Dmitry Bogatov , 2016-05-30, 18:27:
> >I want dh_install to install according following globbing:
> >
> > src/doc/*[a-z].html /usr/share/doc/runit/html
> >
> >(There is also html pages in form foo.1.html, which duplicate man=20
> >pages. I do not want to install them.)
> >
> >But it does n
* Giulio Paci , 2016-05-31, 09:33:
I just checked the building status of openfst and noticed failures on
arm architectures and on kfreebsd-amd64.
On arm it seems to me that a timeout occurred,
One suspicious thing I found in armhf build log is:
/usr/bin/make -C . -j4 -k distclean
but this m
control: owner -1 !
control: tag -1 moreinfo
Hi, looking at requirements.txt, seems that six is used
grep six . -R |grep import
./model_mommy/utils.py:from six import string_types
./model_mommy/generators.py:import six
./model_mommy/recipe.py:from six import string_types
./model_mommy/mommy.py:fr
Your message dated Tue, 31 May 2016 09:41:58 + (UTC)
with message-id <1257747330.3448255.1464687718454.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#825878: RFS: groonga-normalizer-mysql/1.1.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #825878,
regarding RFS: groonga-normalizer-mysql/1.1.1-1
* Dmitry Bogatov , 2016-05-30, 18:27:
I want dh_install to install according following globbing:
src/doc/*[a-z].html /usr/share/doc/runit/html
(There is also html pages in form foo.1.html, which duplicate man
pages. I do not want to install them.)
But it does not work -- nothing is i
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-model-mommy"
* Package name: python-model-mommy
Version : 1.2.6-1
Upstream Author : vandersonmota
* URL : http://github.com/vandersonmota/model_mommy
On Fri, 2016-05-27 at 20:17 +0100, foss.freedom wrote:
> Looking on the mentors / mypackages webpage it says that the watch
> file I've included does not work. This is very strange because I ran
> a uscan and it correctly downloaded the upstream release file:
The version we use on mentors is old
Hi Jakub and all,
I just checked the building status of openfst and noticed failures on
arm architectures and on kfreebsd-amd64.
On arm it seems to me that a timeout occurred, on kfreebsd-amd64 it seems a
compiler failure.
Am I right? Is there anything that could be done?
Bests,
Giulio
Il 24
30 matches
Mail list logo