Your message dated Thu, 19 May 2016 21:17:22 +
with message-id <20160519211720.gr20...@chase.mapreri.org>
and subject line Re: [Letsencrypt-devel] Bug#824787: RFS: acmetool/0.0.51
has caused the Debian Bug report #824787,
regarding RFS: acmetool/0.0.51
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package "acmetool":
git clone https://anonscm.debian.org/git/letsencrypt/acmetool.git
cd acmetool && pristine-tar checkout .
On Wednesday 27 April 2016 13:01:20 Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi, the packaging seems good now, I would like to ask you a final question:
>
> how do you feel about using the same license for debian packaging and
> upstream?
> (asking about changing GPL-3+ to MIT).
Ok, I changed debian files
* Jens Reyer , 2016-05-19, 16:57:
First off, I'm not sure about every single dependency if it is needed
at all.
Quick grep over the *.dll.so indeed shows that they use a bunch of
libraries you mentioned:
$ strings /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/wine/*.dll.so | grep '^lib.*[.]so[.]' | sort
-u | gre
Hi Jens,
>Now, assuming that we really need all of them, but that there is no way
>to automatically add them: is there any way to compute the needed
>runtime dependency for a given builddep, in order to avoid hardcoding
>this list and update it with every soname change of a depended upon
>package?
Hi,
I'm working on adding more runtime dependencies to wine (see #823991).
Wine uses the dh sequencer and all relevant binary packages have a
"Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}". This adds some runtime dependencies, but
by far not for every build-dependency -dev package.
If I try to do that manually I c
Hi Balint and all,
On 16/05/2016 16:50, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> Hi Giulio,
>
> 2016-05-08 14:32 GMT+02:00 Giulio Paci :
>> Hi Balint and all,
>>
>> Il 08/mag/2016 14:15, "Bálint Réczey" ha scritto:
>>>
>>> Control: owner -1 bal...@balintreczey.hu
>>>
>>> 2016-05-06 23:44 GMT+02:00 Gianfranco Cost
Your message dated Thu, 19 May 2016 21:30:03 +1000
with message-id <93ac73f2-7af5-2e06-2a15-76ac3f15a...@thon.love>
and subject line Re: Bug#823478: python3-protobuf3
has caused the Debian Bug report #823478,
regarding RFS: python3-protobuf3/0.2.1-2 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you
On Thu, 2016-05-19 at 06:32 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi Lumin,
> >Why should runtime deps be added into build-dep, which are useless
> >unless I provide python-caffe-* testsuite.
>
>
> not sure then, it should be fine that way!
An update to this, according to
https://people.debian.
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 02:52:27PM +1000, Jonathon Love wrote:
> so the advice i received regarding the name was that i must get it renamed
> upstream[1]. i don't think this will be possible because:
>
> - upstream is an established package, present in PYPI and macports
> - the developer is MIA
Giulio,
On 18 May 2016 at 07:15, Giulio Paci wrote:
> One approach that usually fits my needs is the one proposed by Thibaut
> Paumard [1], that I am reproposing here with minimal changes:
Thanks for sharing this pretty detailed case. As my issue with
"pythonpy" was way more simpler, I ended up
11 matches
Mail list logo
