Bug#822672: RFS: freecell-solver/4.2.0-0.1 [NMU]

2016-04-28 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Shlomi Fish wrote: > I fixed most pep8 warnings there, except for some in the TAP library which was > copied from https://github.com/rjbs/pytap . Embedded code copies are discouraged in Debian, could you remove it from upstream VCS and tarballs and make it a depen

Bug#822895: marked as done (RFS: singular/4.0.3-p1+ds-1 [NEW VERSION] - Computer Algebra System for Polynomial Computations)

2016-04-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 29 Apr 2016 01:21:28 + with message-id <5722b718.6040...@rezozer.net> and subject line RFS: singular/4.0.3-p1+ds-1 [NEW VERSION] - Computer Algebra System for Polynomial Computations has caused the Debian Bug report #822895, regarding RFS: singular/4.0.3-p1+ds-1 [NEW VE

Bug#822856: RFS: dvtm/0.15-0.1 NMU

2016-04-28 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
> > * Bump debhelper compat level (9 -> 10), > Compat level 10 is an experimental feature. NMUs is not a place to make > experiments. > > > * Convert debian/changelog into DEP-5 format > > ITYM debian/copyright, but this is not appropriate for an NMU either. Will fix it. > > * Bump standards v

Bug#822895: RFS: singular/4.0.3-p1+ds-1 [NEW VERSION] - Computer Algebra System for Polynomial Computations

2016-04-28 Thread Jerome BENOIT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Many thanks to Andreas, Jerome -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXIphPAAoJEIC/w4IMSybjspkIAKQeNlspUT0+hKAAb1O8YStL QzPjMeU8bx1wzqNJChXCkdIBHEiFOeC3zC5mNadyQuK67/QULtY1wTqsxaeoiOJl uRZdD9zgXZuAGlSo0Ygz+NtFvvivFvjQaF77GOlA

Bug#822895: RFS: singular/4.0.3-p1+ds-1 [NEW VERSION] - Computer Algebra System for Polynomial Computations

2016-04-28 Thread Jerome Benoit
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear Sponsors, I am looking for sponsorship for the Debian package singular, a Computer Algebra System (CAS) which is key part of Sage. This very pacakge brings the latest release of singular to Debian. Thanks in advance, Jer

Bug#820407: RFS: smartmontools/6.4+svn4214-1~bpo8+1

2016-04-28 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, oops sorry! thanks for understanding, G. Il Giovedì 28 Aprile 2016 18:30, Jonathan Dowland ha scritto: Hi Nicholas, On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 08:31:16PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > Hi, I'm interested in maintaining a backport of this package to > Jessie. The RFS bug associated wit

Bug#820407: RFS: smartmontools/6.4+svn4214-1~bpo8+1

2016-04-28 Thread Jonathan Dowland
Hi Nicholas, On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 08:31:16PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > Hi, I'm interested in maintaining a backport of this package to > Jessie. The RFS bug associated with this is #820407. That's very cool. I see someone has already managed to upload this, but Gianfranco got my Debi

Bug#822856: RFS: dvtm/0.15-0.1 NMU

2016-04-28 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
according to db.d.o one maintainer has last action on 2011 and the other since 2014 maybe we can also start a MIA process? G. Il Giovedì 28 Aprile 2016 18:24, Jakub Wilk ha scritto: * Dmitry Bogatov , 2016-04-28, 08:18: > * Bump debhelper compat level (9 -> 10), Compat level 10 is an exper

Bug#822856: RFS: dvtm/0.15-0.1 NMU

2016-04-28 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Dmitry Bogatov , 2016-04-28, 08:18: * Bump debhelper compat level (9 -> 10), Compat level 10 is an experimental feature. NMUs is not a place to make experiments. * Convert debian/changelog into DEP-5 format ITYM debian/copyright, but this is not appropriate for an NMU either. * Bum

Bug#822856: RFS: dvtm/0.15-0.1 NMU

2016-04-28 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi, I'm unsure about the copyright of: forkpty-* and vt.* can you please doublecheck? I'm also unsure about the versioned debhelper override, who cares? cheers, G. Il Giovedì 28 Aprile 2016 14:21, Dmitry Bogatov ha scritto: Package: sponsorship

Bug#822722: RFS: tldp/0.7.7 [ITP #822181]

2016-04-28 Thread Martin A. Brown
Hello Mattia and Gianfranco, >trimming that CC list: Very good. >debian-bugs-dist@: no, I can't even figure how you found that address... I just replied. Alpine seems to think I should have replied to those with a cc;, as well. I have done no customization that I can think of. But, anyway

Bug#822722: RFS: tldp/0.7.7 [ITP #822181]

2016-04-28 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi! >Hello again Gianfranco (and lots of cc:), (dropped them, lets keep only the bug) >OK, I'll give that a stab. Do you have any example packages you >know that use this technique already? I could then use a working >one to ensure that I'm using a good model. nope :( nothing comes in

Bug#822722: RFS: tldp/0.7.7 [ITP #822181]

2016-04-28 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 08:32:46AM -0700, Martin A. Brown wrote: > Hello again Gianfranco (and lots of cc:), trimming that CC list: debian-bugs-dist@: no, I can't even figure how you found that address... package-sponsorship-requests@: no, it's the email used as maintainer for the sponsorship

Bug#822722: RFS: tldp/0.7.7 [ITP #822181]

2016-04-28 Thread Martin A. Brown
Hello again Gianfranco (and lots of cc:), >Hi Martin, lets pick up this package! Excellent! Thank you very much for the help. >First a general note: I'm truly impressed about your work and your learning >curve! Merci beaucoup! Danke! Grazie! >Don't be sad for my review, the package works,

Bug#822672: RFS: freecell-solver/4.2.0-0.1 [NMU]

2016-04-28 Thread Shlomi Fish
Hi Markus, thanks for your comments. See below for my reply. On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 12:19:58 +0200 Markus Koschany wrote: > Control: owner -1 ! > > Am 26.04.2016 um 12:10 schrieb Shlomi Fish: > > Package: sponsorship-requests > > Severity: normal > > > > Dear mentors, > > > > I am looking for a

Bug#822856: RFS: dvtm/0.15-0.1 NMU

2016-04-28 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dvtm" * Package name: dvtm Version : 0.15-0.1 Upstream Author : Marc Andre Tanner * Url : http://www.brain-dump.org/projects/dvtm * Licenses: MIT/X Sec

Re: request more advice: lintian warnings and python-tldp + ldp-docbook-stylesheets

2016-04-28 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Martin, On 28 April 2016 at 07:51, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > yep, for signing on github, just sign it, and in "releases" tab you should > have some "upload additional files" > where you can upload it (I'm going through my memory) This process is documented on wiki.d.o[1], although worth me

Bug#822722: RFS: tldp/0.7.7 [ITP #822181]

2016-04-28 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Martin, lets pick up this package! First a general note: I'm truly impressed about your work and your learning curve! Don't be sad for my review, the package works, so I guess the review is about minor issues and nitpicks! >control: reassign

Re: request more advice: lintian warnings and python-tldp + ldp-docbook-stylesheets

2016-04-28 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, (note: from now on I'll answer to the RFS bug :) ) >OK, great. I called it python3-tldp, given that the preferred >Python support these days for Debian is Python3 (and I'm following >tox and other examples). yep >My package builds and tests against Python2, but I don't plan on >botheri

Re: [Pkg-fonts-devel] pkg-fonts team needs help to maintain font-forge

2016-04-28 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Raphael Hertzog (hert...@debian.org): > Hello, > > looking at https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=745732 > which has been languishing for two years, it looks like the pkg-fonts > team could need some help to maintain this package. Vasudev Kamath, with the help of discussions

Re: scantailor maintainership and alioth

2016-04-28 Thread Daniel Stender
On 27.04.2016 22:41, Jason Crain wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 06:39:11PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: >> >> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Jason Crain wrote: >> >>> I have a question about Alioth though. The debian package is being >>> maintained at (http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/sc