Bug#820165: RFS: libretro-genesisplusgx/1.7.4+git20160330 [ITP]

2016-04-12 Thread Sérgio Benjamim
Hey! Hi Sergio, the copyright needs a complete rework. BSD-2 BSD-3 BSD zlib/libpng GPL-2 are only some of the missing licenses. please take care of them. There are a bunch of false positive with licensecheck, many BSD which is actually non-commercial (old mame license). I think I fixed the ot

Bug#820733: Guidelines for sensible package synopsis (was: Bug#820733: RFS: Series/1.0 [ITP] -- Keep track of your favourite TV series)

2016-04-12 Thread Giorgio Sartore
Hi Gianfranco, thank you for your answer. I've uploaded the package to https://mentors.debian.net/package/series I'm almost sure I made a few mistakes, so please tell me what to do to fix them. Best regards Giorgio Il 12/apr/2016 14:28, "Gianfranco Costamagna" ha scritto: > Hi Giorgio > > > ht

Bug#820165: RFS: libretro-genesisplusgx/1.7.4+git20160330 [ITP]

2016-04-12 Thread PICCORO McKAY Lenz
2016-04-12 6:44 GMT-04:30 Gianfranco Costamagna : > sdl looks like an embedded library to me > also tremor the codes inside the libretro are modified to fith with libretro cores needs i think! most of siources are like, example mednafen modules are split and then reimplemented separatelly, that in

Bug#820733: Guidelines for sensible package synopsis (was: Bug#820733: RFS: Series/1.0 [ITP] -- Keep track of your favourite TV series)

2016-04-12 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi Giorgio http://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers this should help. cheers, G. Il Martedì 12 Aprile 2016 13:36, Giorgio Sartore ha scritto: Hi all, thank you for your hints. I'll update the synopsis as soon as possibile. I know that I've uploaded the source code yesterday, but I'm

Bug#820793: marked as done (RFS: taskw/1.1.0-2)

2016-04-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 12 Apr 2016 12:30:16 + (UTC) with message-id <1545101295.2456356.1460464216295.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#820793: RFS: taskw/1.1.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #820793, regarding RFS: taskw/1.1.0-2 to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#820793: RFS: taskw/1.1.0-2

2016-04-12 Thread Edward Betts
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "taskw" * Package name: taskw Version : 1.1.0-2 Upstream Author : Ralph Bean * URL : http://github.com/ralphbean/taskw * License : GPL-3+ Section

Bug#820733: Guidelines for sensible package synopsis (was: Bug#820733: RFS: Series/1.0 [ITP] -- Keep track of your favourite TV series)

2016-04-12 Thread Giorgio Sartore
Hi all, thank you for your hints. I'll update the synopsis as soon as possibile. I know that I've uploaded the source code yesterday, but I'm working on it since about a month, in my free time. The project started as a personal program, recently I thought that it could be useful to other people. S

Bug#820165: RFS: libretro-genesisplusgx/1.7.4+git20160330 [ITP]

2016-04-12 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Sergio, the copyright needs a complete rework. BSD-2 BSD-3 BSD zlib/libpng GPL-2 are only some of the missing licenses. please take care of them. sdl looks like an embedded library to me also tremor copyright holders are missing ./sdl/fileio.c

Bug#820539: marked as done (RFS: libretro-desmume [ITP])

2016-04-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 12 Apr 2016 10:46:52 + (UTC) with message-id <1113992367.2346516.1460458012105.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#820539: RFS: libretro-desmume [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #820539, regarding RFS: libretro-desmume [ITP] to be marked as done

Bug#820608: marked as done (RFS: engauge-digitizer/7.2-1 - interactively extracts numbers from bitmap graphs or maps)

2016-04-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 12 Apr 2016 10:24:43 + (UTC) with message-id <1917803143.2277463.1460456683253.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#820608: RFS: engauge-digitizer/7.2-1 - interactively extracts numbers from bitmap graphs or maps has caused the Debian Bug report #8206

Bug#820719: marked as done (RFS: mercurial-keyring/1.1.2-1)

2016-04-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 12 Apr 2016 10:18:26 + (UTC) with message-id <257920705.2292871.1460456306992.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#820719: RFS: mercurial-keyring/1.1.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #820719, regarding RFS: mercurial-keyring/1.1.2-1 to be marked as

Bug#820739: marked as done (RFS: rush/1.7+dfsg-5)

2016-04-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 12 Apr 2016 10:12:51 + (UTC) with message-id <682002211.2270956.1460455971355.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#820739: RFS: rush/1.7+dfsg-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #820739, regarding RFS: rush/1.7+dfsg-5 to be marked as done. This means t

Bug#820749: marked as done (RFS: normaliz/3.1.1+ds-1 [NEW VERSION] -- math computing tool suite)

2016-04-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 12 Apr 2016 10:09:10 + (UTC) with message-id <937388250.202794.1460455750195.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#820749: RFS: normaliz/3.1.1+ds-1 [NEW VERSION] -- math computing tool suite has caused the Debian Bug report #820749, regarding RFS: norm

Bug#820754: marked as done (RFS: m2m-aligner/1.0-2 -- many-to-many alignments for string transduction)

2016-04-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 12 Apr 2016 09:56:32 + (UTC) with message-id <753840133.2287077.1460454993003.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#820754: RFS: m2m-aligner/1.0-2 -- many-to-many alignments for string transduction has caused the Debian Bug report #820754, regarding RF

Re: ITP: logdata-anomaly-miner -- lightweight tool for log checking, log analysis

2016-04-12 Thread Fiedler Roman
Hello List, I have tried to find the required adaptions to comply to the review comments in [1] (see review and note for V0.0.0), but there are still some questions, where I am not sure how to proceed. Could someone please confirm that my proposed changes would really address the review comments a

Bug#810012: RFS: averell/1.2.4-1 ITP 773793

2016-04-12 Thread Jean Parpaillon
Hi, Thanks for your review. Le mercredi 06 avril 2016 à 13:23 +, Gianfranco Costamagna a écrit : > control: tags -1 moreinfo > > Hi, lets do another try > > 1) please remove the changelog entries. > "averell (1.0a-1) unstable; urgency=low" <-- this one too Done > > 2) > override_dh_auto_t