Bug#808782: Fwd: Bug#808782: RFS: jpedal4-lgpl [ITP] Java PDF Extraction Decoding Access Library (LGPL4)

2016-03-02 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello Markus: Sorry for my late reply and thanks for your sponsorship. On 07/01/16 11:26, Markus Koschany wrote: > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > Am 22.12.2015 um 22:56 schrieb Jerome BENOIT: > [...] >> >> Dear Mentors: >> >> I am looking for a sponsor for the packages jpedal4-lgpl, a wide u

Bug#808783: RFS: openviewerfx [ITP] Open Source JavaFX PDF Viewer

2016-03-02 Thread Jerome BENOIT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello Markus: Firstly I apologies for my very late reply. Secondly, thanks you for your sponsorship. On 07/01/16 11:10, Markus Koschany wrote: > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > Am 22.12.2015 um 22:45 schrieb Jerome Benoit: >> Package: sponsorship-r

Bug#816540: RFS: spacefm/1.0.5-1

2016-03-02 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
control: tag -1 moreinfo control: owner -1 ! On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 08:20:12PM +0100, Mateusz Łukasik wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "spacefm" > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/spacefm/spacefm_1.0.5-1.dsc As the other one, can you please remove the nop override_

Bug#816539: RFS: openbox-menu/0.8.0-1

2016-03-02 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
control: tag -1 moreinfo control: owner -1 ! Hi Mateusz! On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 08:04:53PM +0100, Mateusz Łukasik wrote: > dget -x > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/openbox-menu/openbox-menu_0.8.0-1.dsc let me ask for a couple of changes before: * debian/rules: + that overr

Bug#816552: RFS: node-json-localizer/0.0.3-1 [RFP]

2016-03-02 Thread Ross Gammon
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-json-localizer" * Package name: node-json-localizer Version : 0.0.3-1 Upstream Author : Yohan Boniface * URL : https://github.com/yohanboniface/json-localize

Re: hdparm needs a new maintainer

2016-03-02 Thread Troy Benjegerdes
This might also be of interest to package/maintain/integrate: https://github.com/Drive-Trust-Alliance/sedutil I saw a comment about the --security arguments to hdparm being somewhat unreliable. On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 05:02:32PM +0100, Ivan Gimenez wrote: > Hi > > For me it is ok, I am just a

Bug#808249: RFS: libirman/0.5.1-1 [NMU]

2016-03-02 Thread Alec Leamas
On 02/03/16 19:27, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: Hi, now we are waiting for Stefan to review the package :) cheers, G. And, probably more important, we we are waiting for Stefan to review the lirc package. lirc currently has a build dependency on libirman, but the upcoming lirc package turns

Bug#816542: RFS: connman/1.31-0.1 [RC]

2016-03-02 Thread Mateusz Łukasik
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: high Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "connman" * Package name: connman Version : 1.31-0.1 Upstream Author : Intel Corporation * URL : https://git.kernel.org/cgit/network/connman/connman.git *

Bug#816540: RFS: spacefm/1.0.5-1

2016-03-02 Thread Mateusz Łukasik
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "spacefm" * Package name: spacefm Version : 1.0.5-1 Upstream Author : IgnorantGuru * URL : http://ignorantguru.github.io/spacefm/ * License : GPL-3+

Bug#816539: RFS: openbox-menu/0.8.0-1

2016-03-02 Thread Mateusz Łukasik
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "openbox-menu" * Package name: openbox-menu Version : 0.8.0-1 Upstream Author : mimas * URL : https://bitbucket.org/fabriceT/openbox-menu * License :

Bug#807432: RFS: python-jellyfish/0.5.1-1 [ITP]

2016-03-02 Thread Diego M. Rodriguez
Thanks a lot for the feedback and help, Víctor! > # d/patch > > Please upstream them (in case they aren't already in 0.5.2). > ... > # lintian > > there's a spelling error in manpage: accomodate accommodate (upstream > the fix). I have forwarded both those issues upstream [1], which combined wi

Bug#812360: marked as done (RFS: ultracopier/1.2.2.0)

2016-03-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 2 Mar 2016 18:35:59 + with message-id <20160302183559.gd4...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#812360: RFS: ultracopier/1.2.2.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #812360, regarding RFS: ultracopier/1.2.2.0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that th

Bug#808249: RFS: libirman/0.5.1-1 [NMU]

2016-03-02 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Dear Alec, On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 01:31:59PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi again Alec [ work and questions done by Gianfranco ] > I leave to you looking at my work, test the package and fix the last few > lintian warnings. > > let me know how do you feel with this one (attached) G

Bug#808249: RFS: libirman/0.5.1-1 [NMU]

2016-03-02 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, now we are waiting for Stefan to review the package :) cheers, G.

Bug#806572: RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA]

2016-03-02 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Hi Robert! On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 10:38:47AM -0500, Robert James Clay wrote: > Hi Tobias! > > On Thursday, January 07, 2016 05:54:29 AM Tobias Frost wrote: > > > On Tue, 05 Jan 2016 18:08:55 -0500 Robert James Clay > > wrote: > > > On Tuesday, January 05, 2016 04:27:48 AM Tobias Frost wrote:

Bug#804644: marked as done (RFS: flashybrid/0.19 [ITA])

2016-03-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 2 Mar 2016 18:11:50 + with message-id <20160302181150.ga4...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#804644: RFS: flashybrid/0.19 [ITA] has caused the Debian Bug report #804644, regarding RFS: flashybrid/0.19 [ITA] to be marked as done. This means that you claim tha

Bug#816401: marked as done (RFS: irssi-scripts/20160301)

2016-03-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 2 Mar 2016 18:00:31 + (UTC) with message-id <913267493.3726927.1456941631605.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#816401: RFS: irssi-scripts/20160301 has caused the Debian Bug report #816401, regarding RFS: irssi-scripts/20160301 to be marked as done.

Bug#814452: RFS: printrun/1:0~20150310-1 [ITP] -- 3D printing host suite

2016-03-02 Thread Rock Storm
Hi everyone, A new version has been uploaded [1] that aggregates all comments and suggestions received thus far. Basically: * The changelog file has been cleaned up and the epoch change has been dropped. * The copyright file has been thoroughly rewritten. I am looking forward to hearing fur

Bug#816433: marked as done (RFS: complexity/1.5+dfsg-1 ITP)

2016-03-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 02 Mar 2016 16:31:46 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: complexity/1.5+dfsg-1 ITP has caused the Debian Bug report #816433, regarding RFS: complexity/1.5+dfsg-1 ITP to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If th

Bug#812728: marked as done (RFS: identity4c/1.0-1 [ITP] -- UFP Identity C library)

2016-03-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 2 Mar 2016 16:52:51 +0100 with message-id <56d70c53.9030...@debian.org> and subject line Re: RFS: identity4c/1.0-1 [ITP] -- UFP Identity C library has caused the Debian Bug report #812728, regarding RFS: identity4c/1.0-1 [ITP] -- UFP Identity C library to be marked as done.

Bug#816242: RFS: gap-openmath/11.3.1+ds-1 [NEW VERSION] --OpenMath phrasebook for GAP

2016-03-02 Thread Jerome BENOIT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello Mattia: thanks for your sponsoring. On 02/03/16 15:49, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > control: tag -1 moreinfo > control: owner -1 ! > > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 03:01:01AM +0100, Jerome Benoit wrote: >> I am looking for a sponsor to bring to Debian

Bug#816242: marked as done (RFS: gap-openmath/11.3.1+ds-1 [NEW VERSION] --OpenMath phrasebook for GAP)

2016-03-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 2 Mar 2016 15:41:59 + with message-id <20160302154159.gj20...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#816242: RFS: gap-openmath/11.3.1+ds-1 [NEW VERSION] --OpenMath phrasebook for GAP has caused the Debian Bug report #816242, regarding RFS: gap-openmath/11.3.1+ds-1

Bug#816367: marked as done (RFS: pidgin-sipe/1.20.1-1 -- Pidgin plugin for MS Office Communicator and MS Lync)

2016-03-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 2 Mar 2016 15:32:42 + with message-id <20160302153242.gi20...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#816367: RFS: pidgin-sipe/1.20.1-1 -- Pidgin plugin for MS Office Communicator and MS Lync has caused the Debian Bug report #816367, regarding RFS: pidgin-sipe/1.20.

Bug#799268: ITP missing for package python-ck with RFS 799268 with ITP in title

2016-03-02 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Control: Retitle -1 ITP: python-ck -- light-weight knowledge manager Control: reassign -1 wnpp * Package name : python-ck Version : 1.6.14 Upstream Author : Grigori Fursin * URL : httpgithub.com/ctuning/ck * License : BSD-3-clause Description: Python2 light-weight knowledge manager Collective K

Bug#816351: marked as done (RFS: perspective-el/1.12+git20160216.add7942-1 -- tagged workspaces in Emacs)

2016-03-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 2 Mar 2016 15:16:49 + with message-id <20160302151649.gh20...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#816351: RFS: perspective-el/1.12+git20160216.add7942-1 -- tagged workspaces in Emacs has caused the Debian Bug report #816351, regarding RFS: perspective-el/1.12+gi

Bug#816356: marked as done (RFS: progress/0.13-2)

2016-03-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 2 Mar 2016 15:08:35 + (UTC) with message-id <1652338883.3594759.1456931315629.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#816356: RFS: progress/0.13-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #816356, regarding RFS: progress/0.13-2 to be marked as done. This means t

Bug#814663: marked as done (RFS: aggressive-indent-mode/1.5-1 -- Emacs minor mode that reindents code after every change)

2016-03-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 2 Mar 2016 15:04:54 + with message-id <20160302150454.gg20...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#814663: RFS: aggressive-indent-mode/1.5-1 -- Emacs minor mode that reindents code after every change has caused the Debian Bug report #814663, regarding RFS: aggres

Bug#816262: marked as done (RFS: python-hdf5storage/0.1.13-1)

2016-03-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 2 Mar 2016 15:03:37 + with message-id <20160302150337.gf20...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#816262: RFS: python-hdf5storage/0.1.13-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #816262, regarding RFS: python-hdf5storage/0.1.13-1 to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#816242: RFS: gap-openmath/11.3.1+ds-1 [NEW VERSION] --OpenMath phrasebook for GAP

2016-03-02 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
control: tag -1 moreinfo control: owner -1 ! On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 03:01:01AM +0100, Jerome Benoit wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor to bring to Debian the latest version of > gap-openmath [1], > a package for the Computer Algebra System (CAS) GAP. > > [1] https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/deb

Bug#816363: RFS: fgetty/0.7-0.1 [NMU] -- very small, efficient, console-only getty

2016-03-02 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, >If pape gives up the package I'll be only happy to see another package >being updated to the newer standards :) Pape was so kind in another similar issue about giving comaintenance of a package https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=790125#70 so, you might consider this "appl

Bug#816363: RFS: fgetty/0.7-0.1 [NMU] -- very small, efficient, console-only getty

2016-03-02 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 07:02:59PM +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > [2016-03-01 13:28] Mattia Rizzolo > > please DON'T CC debian-mentors (or anybody, for what metters) while > > filing bugs to sub...@bugs.debian.org. The CCed people will receive an > > email from you without the bug number, and wil

Bug#814083: RFS: kwstyle/1.0.1+git3224cf2-1 [ITA]

2016-03-02 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
control: owner -1 ! control: tag -1 moreinfo Hi Benjamin! On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 07:15:04PM +0100, Benjamin Eikel wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kwstyle" Cool, I'm available to review and sponsor this :) > You can find the current state of my packaging work at > https

Re: hdparm needs a new maintainer

2016-03-02 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi Jakub >debsign doesn't pay attention to any of these environment variables. >To specify key ID for debsign, you should put DEBSIGN_KEYID in the >configuration file ~/.devscripts. true, I also had it there :) maybe they are for dch in .bashrc? I don't remember :) thanks! G.

Re: hdparm needs a new maintainer

2016-03-02 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Gianfranco Costamagna , 2016-03-02, 09:57: igimenez@debian:~/debian/hdparm$ gbp buildpackage --git-ignore-new [...] running debsign failed yes, you have to sign them. By default the key is searched with a match on the debian/changelog last entry. You can override it by exporting export DEBEM

Re: hdparm needs a new maintainer

2016-03-02 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, >igimenez@debian:~/debian/hdparm$ gbp buildpackage --git-ignore-new [...] running debsign failed yes, you have to sign them. By default the key is searched with a match on the debian/changelog last entry. You can override it by exporting export DEBEMAIL='youremail' export DEBFULLNAME='name s

Re: hdparm needs a new maintainer

2016-03-02 Thread Ivan Gimenez
Excellent point Ginfranco That will help me for sure when I had all the changes on package ready to upload. I was trying to build it for testing purposes, so as my very much appreciated debian mentor told me, adding the options -us -uc would suffice. Regards Ivan On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 10:57

Re: hdparm needs a new maintainer

2016-03-02 Thread Ivan Gimenez
Hi Alex Sorry if the question is dumb... Just cloned and while trying to build the package I got igimenez@debian:~/debian/hdparm$ gbp buildpackage --git-ignore-new [...] Now signing changes and any dsc files... signfile hdparm_9.48-1.dsc Alexandre Mestiashvili < a...@biotec.tu-dresden.de> gpg: s

Bug#814852: RFS: openfst/1.5.1-1 -- weighted finite-state transducers library

2016-03-02 Thread Giulio Paci
On 29/02/2016 16:37, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Giulio Paci , 2016-02-29, 13:24: >> 1) I need to package latest version, as the differences are not trivial >> anymore; >> 2) I have to convince upstream stop these bad practices (however it seems >> very hard, as they stop for one release and then start