Bug#814550: RFS: codecrypt/1.7.3-1 (ITP #814462)

2016-02-12 Thread Miroslav Kratochvil
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "codecrypt" * Package name: codecrypt Version : 1.7.3-1 Upstream Author : Mirek Kratochvil * URL : https://github.com/exaexa/codecrypt * License : LGPL

Bug#814548: RFS: todotxt-cli/2.10-2

2016-02-12 Thread Ondrej Novy
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "todotxt-cli" * Package name: todotxt-cli Version : 2.10-2 Upstream Author : Gina Trapani * URL : http://todotxt.com/ * License : GPL-3+ Section :

Re: debian/control: Multi-Arch: no

2016-02-12 Thread hpfn
> * Herbert Fortes , 2016-02-11, 11:20: > >The script (cdk5-config) seems to be used by one package[0]. > >I've already sent a bugreport to the maintainer. > > > >[0] - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=813914 > > I don't believe libcdk-perl uses cdk5-config at the moment. In the

Fwd: Re: reason not to upload new versions as fast as possible to unstable? (expect attempt to migrate to testing )

2016-02-12 Thread toogley
forgot to reply to the list.. Forwarded Message Subject: Re: reason not to upload new versions as fast as possible to unstable? (expect attempt to migrate to testing ) Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 14:43:00 +0100 From: toogley To: Gianfranco Costamagna , 801...@bugs.debian.org <80

Re: reason not to upload new versions as fast as possible to unstable? (expect attempt to migrate to testing )

2016-02-12 Thread toogley
Hey, of course he will - but i want to learn it, so that i can be a "independent" maintainer. Independent in the sense of not bound to other people, so that i don't have to rely on the experience of someone else :D thanks for your answer :) On 02/12/2016 01:42 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote

Re: RFC: Packaging a toolchain for CloudABI, a new architecture/runtime

2016-02-12 Thread Alex Willmer
(resending to the list) On 12 February 2016 at 04:54, Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 7:57 AM, Alex Willmer wrote: >> 1. Are there specific rules/procedures regarding adding an entry to >> the ostable & tripletable files used by dpkg-architecture? Or is it >> just another patch submiss

Re: reason not to upload new versions as fast as possible to unstable? (expect attempt to migrate to testing )

2016-02-12 Thread Adam Borowski
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 01:21:06PM +0100, toogley wrote: > the wicd package currently has version 1.7.3 in unstable and testing, but > 1.7.4 is already imported. Generally speaking it seems to me very reasonable > to try to upload versions as fast as possible into unstable and testing, so > I'm jus

Re: reason not to upload new versions as fast as possible to unstable? (expect attempt to migrate to testing )

2016-02-12 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, >the wicd package currently has version 1.7.3 in unstable and testing, >but 1.7.4 is already imported. Generally speaking it seems to me very >reasonable to try to upload versions as fast as possible into unstable >and testing, so I'm just asking for clarification: > >Apart from wanting t

reason not to upload new versions as fast as possible to unstable? (expect attempt to migrate to testing )

2016-02-12 Thread toogley
Hey, the wicd package currently has version 1.7.3 in unstable and testing, but 1.7.4 is already imported. Generally speaking it seems to me very reasonable to try to upload versions as fast as possible into unstable and testing, so I'm just asking for clarification: Apart from wanting to mig

Re: Adding SONAME to a shared object in KLEE

2016-02-12 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
debdiff attached. --- klee-1.1.0/debian/patches/fix-soname.patch 1970-01-01 00:00:00.0 + +++ klee-1.1.0/debian/patches/fix-soname.patch 2016-02-12 11:42:47.0 + @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +--- klee-1.1.0.orig/Makefile.rules klee-1.1.0/Makefile.rules +@@ -1094,7 +1094,7 @@ endi