retitle -1 RFS: classic-theme-restorer/1.4.7-1 [ITP] -- customize the new
Iceweasel look
thanks
Dear mentors,
Upstream has released a new version, and I have prepared a new package.
* Package name: classic-theme-restorer
Version : 1.4.7-1
Upstream Author : Aris
* URL
Gianfranco,
On 1 February 2016 at 11:36, Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
> this is annoying for me too, but I usually keep them installed or I remove
> them after
> sponsoring the package.
> (for uploading I use source-only if possible, pbuilder, or DebOMatic as
> fallbacks)
If it annoys me havin
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 09:11:12PM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
> There though may be other reasons why a package is held back from
> migrating to testing, e.g. if a package it depends on or build-depends
> on, hasn't migrated to testing yet.
Just to be picky, build-dependencies are not considered f
Hi,
toogley wrote:
> On 02/01/2016 09:11 PM, Axel Beckert wrote:
> > And the uploads 1.7.3-1 and 1.7.3-2 have shown that this probably was
> > a good idea. ;-)
>
> Do you mean because of the big amount of fixed bugs?
Because quite some severe bugs were found in the first two uploads.
There were
On 02/01/2016 09:11 PM, Axel Beckert wrote:
> In general or in case of wicd as of now?
i'm interested in both, so thanks for answering it :)
On 02/01/2016 09:11 PM, Axel Beckert wrote:
> And the uploads 1.7.3-1 and 1.7.3-2 have shown that this probably was
> a good idea. ;-)
Do you mean becau
Hi,
toogley wrote:
> what exactly needs to be changed in the package to be uploaded in
> unstable?
In general or in case of wicd as of now? In general there can be many
reasons. A common one is though the one which currently applies to wicd:
I want to wait with the next upload until the current
Hey,
what exactly needs to be changed in the package to be uploaded in
unstable? Or what is the reason for waiting some time before changing
from "UNRELEASED" to "unstable" inside the debian changelog file?
On 01/26/2016 02:24 PM, Axel Beckert wrote:
Hi,
toogley wrote:
does it bother, wh
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "groonga"
* Package name: groonga
Version : 5.1.2-1
Upstream Author : Groonga Project
* URL : http://groonga.org/
* License : LGPL-2.1
Section
Hi, I'm going to answer to the upstream issue.
cheers,
G.
Il Domenica 31 Gennaio 2016 7:50, Marko Dimjašević ha
scritto:
Hi all,
I've been working on creating a Debian package for the KLEE tool per the
following ITP:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=576142
I can build a
Hi,
>Mostly because using "USE_PDEBUILD_INTERNAL=yes" in "~/.pbuilderrc" I>don't
>have to install the build dependencies (which maybe
>needed[1][2]) on the system itself, as it will take care of everything
>on the chroot. Although I do have a machine which is reserved for
>development only, I tak
Hi all!
I upload a new version of SyncTerm package.
feel free for comments/reviews!
http://mentors.debian.net/package/syncterm
Thanks!
Saludos!
--
Fernando Toledo
Dock Sud BBS
http://bbs.docksud.com.ar
telnet://bbs.docksud.com.ar
Hi,
>Well, sorry...
>I'd suggest to make the package fit for stretch. Backports is IMHO out
>of scope.
exactly. It is unfortunate that llvm-* folks likes to change/break API,
but Debian Maintainers can't handle many different llvm releases at the same
time (specially for security purposes).
So,
12 matches
Mail list logo
