Control: retitle -1 RFS: tiny-initramfs/0.1-1 [ITP] - Minimalistic initramfs
implementation
Sorry for the noise, just noticed I had ITA in the title
instead of ITP after receiving the bugtracker confirmation
email. :-(
Regards,
Christian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 12:19:09PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Pilisi Gergely , 2016-01-22, 14:55:
> >export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS = hardening=+all
> >export CPPFLAGS=$(shell dpkg-buildflags --get CPPFLAGS)
> >export CFLAGS=$(shell dpkg-buildflags --get CFLAGS)
> >export CXXFLAGS=$(shell dpkg-bu
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tiny-initramfs"
* Package name: tiny-initramfs
Version : 0.1-1
Upstream Author : Christian Seiler
* URL : https://github.com/chris-se/tiny-initramfs/
* Lice
Your message dated Tue, 26 Jan 2016 18:51:42 +
with message-id <20160126185142.gd13...@chase.mapreri.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#812430: RFS: 9wm/1.3.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #812430,
regarding RFS: 9wm/1.3.5-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Tue, 26 Jan 2016 18:52:49 +
with message-id <20160126185249.ge13...@chase.mapreri.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#812491: RFS: h5py/2.5.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #812491,
regarding RFS: h5py/2.5.0-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 06:57:17PM +0100, alpha_one_x86 wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "Ultracopier" same code as
> Supercopier.
> The old mentor don't update it, the dep is Qt 5.
Hi Jakub,
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 05:12:26PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Andreas Tille , 2016-01-25, 22:06:
> >sorry, I have no idea about fley and need help to fix this problem.
>
> I think it's a bit premature to ask debian-mentors for help when your RC bug
> is 7 minutes old. What you could d
* Andreas Tille , 2016-01-25, 22:06:
sorry, I have no idea about fley and need help to fix this problem.
I think it's a bit premature to ask debian-mentors for help when your RC
bug is 7 minutes old. What you could do instead is:
* Wait a bit longer. Perhaps one of the numerous co-maintainer
Hi,
toogley wrote:
> does it bother, when i work at the package within a delay of a week at most?
If it doesn't bother that I work on the package, too.
At least I want to fix the things I broke with the initial 1.7.3
upload. :-)
> @Axel:
>
> May i import + upload the next version of wicd (whic
additionally: is it harmful for users/debian/wicd/whatever, when i work
at a particular problem regarding the wicd package with a delay of 2,3,4
weeks?
i mean, of course i intend to work regularly(=at least every week) on
wicd, but just to be sure..^^
On 01/26/2016 01:44 PM, toogley wrote:
does it bother, when i work at the package within a delay of a week at most?
@Axel:
May i import + upload the next version of wicd (which is 1.7.5, i think)?
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/wicd.html
says, the package building has failed, because of "dpkg-source: w
Hi, ettercap has some flex code, does it helps?
I don't understand flex either, sorry :(
cheers,
G.
Il Lunedì 25 Gennaio 2016 22:07, Andreas Tille ha scritto:
Hi,
sorry, I have no idea about fley and need help to fix this problem.
Any hint would be welcome.
Kind regards
Andre
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mdk-doc-non-dfsg"; it is
the non-DFSG documentation (GNU Free Documentation License with invariant
front and back covers) for mdk, the MIX Development Kit.
* Package name: mdk-doc-non-d
* Pilisi Gergely , 2016-01-22, 14:55:
export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS = hardening=+all
export CPPFLAGS=$(shell dpkg-buildflags --get CPPFLAGS)
export CFLAGS=$(shell dpkg-buildflags --get CFLAGS)
export CXXFLAGS=$(shell dpkg-buildflags --get CXXFLAGS)
export LDFLAGS=$(shell dpkg-buildflags --get LD
Hi,
>If a package is already in NEW, you could ask ftp-masters to REJECT the
>package. Then you could upload the package again with the same version.
>
>But it's simpler (both for you and ftp-masters) if you just upload a new
>Debian release.
>
>Anyway, I see that -1 has been already accepted.
Hi,
2016-01-25 18:27 GMT+01:00 Mattia Rizzolo :
>
> So, given that those are still warnings (that would be nice to get rid
> of), and that are for sure not blockers, what would you think about
>
uploading it as it's now and work on it on a later time?
>
I think that's a good idea, we will sort i
16 matches
Mail list logo
