Bug#812360: RFS: ultracopier/1.2.2.0

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "Ultracopier" same code as Supercopier. The old mentor don't update it, the dep is Qt 5.4+ no more. Ultracopier is free and open source software licensed under GPL3 that acts as a replacement

Bug#802797: ITP missing for package ultraeasy with RFS 802797 with ITP in title

According to [0], ultraeasy has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 802797 title. Please, could you file this ITP bug? Thanks for your work! [0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt

Bug#802703: ITP missing for package cvars with RFS 802703 with ITP in title

According to [0], cvars has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 802703 title. Please, could you file this ITP bug? Thanks for your work! [0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt

Bug#799268: ITP missing for package python-ck with RFS 799268 with ITP in title

According to [0], python-ck has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite #799268 title. Please, could you file this ITP bug? Thanks for your work! [0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt

Bug#811237: marked as done (RFS: libupnp/1:1.6.19+git20160116-1 [RC])

Your message dated Fri, 22 Jan 2016 14:36:49 + (UTC) with message-id <1770895081.14770417.1453473409757.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#811237: RFS: libupnp/1:1.6.19+git20160116-1 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #811237, regarding RFS: libupnp/1:1.6.19+git20160116

Bug#808141: sponsorship-requests: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package eclipse-titan.

Hi, First of all, thank you for the help. :) The new package is on the mentors site. 2016-01-17 14:09 GMT+01:00 Mattia Rizzolo : > > but most importantly, I couldn't get eclipse-titan build today. > First it failed with > > /usr/bin/ld: LoggerPlugin_dynamic.o: undefined reference to symbol > 'dl

Re: PAM module packaging help

Hi, I don't understand what are you asking... anyway, if you add the libfoo-dev to the build dependencies you should be fine, as long as you have the shlibs:Depends substvar on your runtime dependencies. With some code/packaging we might provide better answers cheers, G. Il Giovedì 21 Genn

Bug#812253: marked as done (RFS: mozilla-devscripts/0.44 -- Development scripts used by Mozilla's addons packages)

Your message dated Fri, 22 Jan 2016 13:20:54 + (UTC) with message-id <61580875.14588288.1453468854831.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#812253: RFS: mozilla-devscripts/0.44 -- Development scripts used by Mozilla's addons packages has caused the Debian Bug report #812253,

Bug#812332: marked as done (RFS: re2c/0.16-1 -- tool for generating fast C-based recognizers)

Your message dated Fri, 22 Jan 2016 13:07:25 + (UTC) with message-id <2078028218.14767029.1453468045602.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#812332: RFS: re2c/0.16-1 -- tool for generating fast C-based recognizers has caused the Debian Bug report #812332, regarding RFS: re2

Bug#812332: RFS: re2c/0.16-1 -- tool for generating fast C-based recognizers

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: kilob...@angband.pl,x...@debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for "re2c": Package name: re2c Version : 0.16-1 Upstream Author : Peter Bumbulis et al. URL : http://re2c.org License