On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 01:51:20PM +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> You need to have $(DEB_HOST_ARCH) properly defined (dpkg-buildpackage does
> this for you, but you should not rely on that). Please see the “Usage in
> debian/rules” section of dpkg-architecture(1) for details.
>
> Also, it's bette
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for a new version of propellor.
* Package name: propellor
Version : 2.15.3-1
Upstream Author : Joey Hess
* URL : https://propellor.branchable.com/
* License : BSD-2-clause
Control: retitle 782074 RFS: ublock-origin/1.5.6+dfsg-1 [ITP] --
general-purpose lightweight ads, malware, trackers blocker
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my packaging of ublock-origin.
uBlock is a popular alternative to Adblock Plus that has a much lower
CPU and memory footprint,
Your message dated Tue, 12 Jan 2016 23:42:45 +
with message-id <20160112234245.ga18...@chase.mapreri.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#809451: sponsorship-requests: librep/0.92.5-1 [ITA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #809451,
regarding RFS: librep/0.92.5-1 [ITA]
to be marked as done.
This means
> On 12 Jan 2016, at 11:41 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna
> wrote:
>
> (wrong hotkey)
> Hi,
>
> If you think it is a full and better replacement of LizardFS, you need to talk
>
> with LizardFS maintainer, reachable at
> https://packages.qa.debian.org/l/lizardfs.html
Thanks for the hint.
You know
(wrong hotkey)
Hi,
If you think it is a full and better replacement of LizardFS, you need to talk
with LizardFS maintainer, reachable at
https://packages.qa.debian.org/l/lizardfs.html
cheers,
Gianfranco
>Il Martedì 12 Gennaio 2016 22:52, Piotr Robert Konopelko
> ha scritto:
>I forgot to mention, that MooseFS fork - LizardFS is a fork
>of *old* MooseFS version - 1.6.27-5 which is a far behind
>2.0.x (stable) or 3.0.x (curent / testing).
>
>(Far behind = since MFS 1.6.x a lot of features have been
Your message dated Tue, 12 Jan 2016 22:13:26 + (UTC)
with message-id <1815479814.3524764.1452636807001.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#804100: RFS:
rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar/0.14.0-1~debian [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #804100,
regarding RFS: rhythm
> On 12 Jan 2016, at 10:44 PM, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>
> Or a server crashes, or a daemon has a bug, etc...
I agree.
Best regards,
--
Piotr Robert Konopelko
On Jan 12, Piotr Robert Konopelko wrote:
> > Can you clarify this point? moosefs.com explains that high availability
> > features are available only in the proprietary version of the software.
> If you loose Master Server, user action is needed: he can run another
> Master Server e.g. basing on
I forgot to mention, that MooseFS fork - LizardFS is a fork
of *old* MooseFS version - 1.6.27-5 which is a far behind
2.0.x (stable) or 3.0.x (curent / testing).
(Far behind = since MFS 1.6.x a lot of features have been
added and a lot of improvements in algorithms have been made,
full list is ava
> Can you clarify this point? moosefs.com explains that high availability
> features are available only in the proprietary version of the software.
Of course.
MooseFS components in free version are highly available but Master Server.
It means, that if for some reason you loose e.g. whole Chunkse
severity 810853 wishlist
Control: severity -1 wishlist
On Jan 12, Piotr Robert Konopelko wrote:
> Distinctive features of MooseFS are:
>
> * High availability
Can you clarify this point? moosefs.com explains that high availability
features are available only in the proprietary version of the software.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Desc
I forgot to mention, that there is a fork of MooseFS in Debian repository
already, called LizardFS.
Best regards,
--
Piotr Robert Konopelko
MooseFS Technical Support Engineer | moosefs.com
On 09/01/16 21:07, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 06:57:08PM +, Jose M Calhariz wrote:
>>> I'm going to try rebuilding the rdeps in the later today or tomrrow, and
>>> I'll report back the results.
>> Ok.
> that clearly fails because the header moved from e.g. rep.h =>
> rep/re
X-Debbugs-Cc: piotr.konope...@moosefs.com, debian-de...@lists.debian.org,
debian-mentors@lists.debian.org, d...@moosefs.com
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear Mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for our team's package - MooseFS
Package name : moosefs
Version
Am 11.01.2016 um 21:22 schrieb Gianfranco Costamagna:
and fix the below:
-changelog: one single entry with "initial debian version or whatever and Closes:
#ITP bug"
-control: seems fine, you can drop the debug package now that Debian has ddbg
infrastructure
(automatic debug packages creation)
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nvme-cli":
* Package name: nvme-cli
Version : 0.2-1
Upstream Author : Keith Busch
* URL : https://github.com/linux-nvme/nvme-cli
* License : GPL-2
Hi,
>The copyright for snetmanmon isn't autogenerated, it's part of the
>README. What I'm generating here is the file which is necessary for the
>debian package, mainly because I don't want to have the GPL in the
>standard LICENSE file and in debian/copyright. And that is something I
>likely
Your message dated Tue, 12 Jan 2016 16:52:39 + (UTC)
with message-id <1631422699.356410.1452617559777.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#807463: RFS: pnmixer/0.6.1-1 [ITP] -- Simple mixer
application for system tray
has caused the Debian Bug report #807463,
regarding RFS:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Control: owner -1 !
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi, packaging stuff/binaries randomly donwloaded from the internet is
somewhat a no-go for Debian in general.
some additional remarks:
you are exposing an i386 package, but I think it runs on amd64 too.
Control: owner -1 !
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi, lets review:
http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/node-restore/0.3.0-1/lintian
lintian needs fixing
I: node-restore source: xs-testsuite-header-in-debian-control xs-testsuite
I: node-restore source: quilt-patch-missing-descript
Hi !
> please use autoreconf instead of autotools-dev
> (dh-autoreconf and call dh --with autoreconf)
done
> please remove all the comments from rules file
> and also the two lines below
> DPKG_EXPORT_BUILDFLAGS = 1
> include /usr/share/dpkg/default.mk
done
> "
> * This is my first Debian pack
Subject: ITP: MooseFS -- MooseFS (MFS) is a fault tolerant, highly available,
highly performing, scaling-out, network distributed file system. It spreads
data over several physical servers which are visible to the user as one
resource. For standard file operations MooseFS mounted with FUSE acts
Subject : ITP: moosefs-master -- MooseFS (MFS) is a fault tolerant,
highly available, highly performing, scaling-out, network distributed file
system. It spreads data over several physical servers which are visible to the
user as one resource. For standard file operations MooseFS mounted
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:54:05AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Note for future: in debian/rules you have this line:
>
> ifeq (,$(filter $(DEB_HOST_ARCH),kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 hurd-i386))
>
> You need to have $(DEB_HOST_ARCH) properly defined (dpkg-buildpackage does
> this
Your message dated Tue, 12 Jan 2016 13:51:20 +0300
with message-id <145259588030.3756.5141923158132074...@mitya57.me>
and subject line Re: RFS: twinkle/1:1.9.0+dfsg-3 -- Voice over Internet
Protocol (VoIP) SIP Phone
has caused the Debian Bug report #810572,
regarding RFS: twinkle/1:1.9.0+dfsg-3 --
29 matches
Mail list logo
