Re: Re: Re: mentor wanted

2016-01-09 Thread Wookey
+++ Stephan Foley [2016-01-09 22:02 -0500]: > Hi Gianfranco, > > Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > > A whole set of issues, but mentors as said by Paul is regarding > > mostly packaging issues > > Well, the whole idea behind blends is packaging. For example, to > have tasks posted to the website I n

Re: Re: Re: Re: mentor wanted

2016-01-09 Thread Stephan Foley
Thanks for the reply, Paul. Paul Wise wrote: > Pretty much all Debian mentoring is done in public not in private. OK, this is cool with me. I will return with any packaging questions. Thanks for your time, Steve

Re: Re: Re: mentor wanted

2016-01-09 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Stephan Foley wrote: > Well, I did post to debian-blends and they told me to RTFM, > which I thought was pretty funny. I guess you are referring to this mail where Andreas pointed you at the documentation that answers some of your questions. https://lists.debian

Re: Re: Re: mentor wanted

2016-01-09 Thread Stephan Foley
Hi Gianfranco, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > A whole set of issues, but mentors as said by Paul is regarding > mostly packaging issues Well, the whole idea behind blends is packaging. For example, to have tasks posted to the website I need a control file in a Debian folder. I need a rules file,

Re: Re: Re: mentor wanted

2016-01-09 Thread Stephan Foley
Hi Paul and thanks for the reply. Paul Wise wrote: All these are topics for the debian-blends list. Well, I did post to debian-blends and they told me to RTFM, which I thought was pretty funny. But, going back to my original post, I am just following the Debian Developers' Reference manual wh

Bug#810572: RFS: twinkle/1:1.9.0+dfsg-3 -- Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) SIP Phone

2016-01-09 Thread Peter Colberg
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the package "twinkle": git clone https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-voip/twinkle.git cd twinkle && pristine-tar checkout ../twinkle_1.9.0+dfsg.orig.tar.xz For verification, these are the current branch h

Bug#809784: marked as done (RFS: cligh/0.2-3 ITP)

2016-01-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 9 Jan 2016 21:17:11 + with message-id <20160109211711.gc8...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#809784: RFS: cligh/0.2-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #809784, regarding RFS: cligh/0.2-3 ITP to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem ha

Bug#809451: sponsorship-requests: librep/0.92.5-1 [ITA]

2016-01-09 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 06:57:08PM +, Jose M Calhariz wrote: > > I'm going to try rebuilding the rdeps in the later today or tomrrow, and > > I'll report back the results. > > Ok. that clearly fails because the header moved from e.g. rep.h => rep/rep.h. Well, guess thtat's expected, also the

Bug#810529: RFS: moc/1:2.6.0~svn-r2788-1

2016-01-09 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 07:50:47PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > * Mattia Rizzolo [2016-01-09 15:53 +]: > > * debian/rules: > > + dh_strip --no-ddebs => WHY ?! so much work has been done to get > > automatically built debug packages, why you wouldn't want them? > > I don't want to

Bug#810529: RFS: moc/1:2.6.0~svn-r2788-1

2016-01-09 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
* Mattia Rizzolo [2016-01-09 15:53 +]: [...] > ok, some stuff I'd like to see changeed/explained before uploading: > > * debian/rules: > + dh_strip --no-ddebs => WHY ?! so much work has been done to get > automatically built debug packages, why you wouldn't want them? I don't want to

Bug#809451: sponsorship-requests: librep/0.92.5-1 [ITA]

2016-01-09 Thread Jose M Calhariz
One more iteraction. On 07/01/16 14:31, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 08:23:34PM +, Jose M Calhariz wrote: >> On 03/01/16 13:21, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: >>> 43: override_dh_auto_install: >>> 44: dh_auto_install >>> 45: dh_install >>> >>> instead please override

Bug#809451: sponsorship-requests: librep/0.92.5-1 [ITA]

2016-01-09 Thread Jose M Calhariz
On 09/01/16 17:50, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 05:06:16PM +, Jose M Calhariz wrote: >> One more iteraction. > oh, this is getting cooler and cooler :) > >> On 07/01/16 14:31, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: >>> On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 08:23:34PM +, Jose M Calhariz wrote: On 0

Bug#809451: sponsorship-requests: librep/0.92.5-1 [ITA]

2016-01-09 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 05:06:16PM +, Jose M Calhariz wrote: > One more iteraction. oh, this is getting cooler and cooler :) > On 07/01/16 14:31, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 08:23:34PM +, Jose M Calhariz wrote: > >> On 03/01/16 13:21, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > >>> look

Bug#810543: RFS: python-bond/1.4-1 [ITP]

2016-01-09 Thread Yuri D'Elia
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-bond" * Package name: python-bond Version : 1.4-1 Upstream Author : Yuri D'Elia * URL : http://www.thregr.org/~wavexx/software/python-bond/ * License

Bug#810529: RFS: moc/1:2.6.0~svn-r2788-1

2016-01-09 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
* Mattia Rizzolo [2016-01-09 15:53 +]: [...] > ok, some stuff I'd like to see changeed/explained before uploading: > > * debian/rules: > + dh_strip --no-ddebs => WHY ?! so much work has been done to get > automatically built debug packages, why you wouldn't want them? I don't want to

Re: Bug#809727: RFS: hwb/1:040412-7

2016-01-09 Thread Robert James Clay
On Saturday, January 09, 2016 09:44:59 AM Jakub Wilk wrote: > The person doing whitelisting will probably want to look at the package, > so I'd only send e-mail after the package has been uploaded and > ACCEPTed. That makes sense; thanks for the clarification! RJ Clay

Re: Bug#801253: O: wicd -- wired and wireless network manager

2016-01-09 Thread toogley
I don't mind - the rest of your email, i'll answer in the next days. again, thank you :) On 01/09/2016 03:57 PM, Axel Beckert wrote: P.S. to Toogley: I might do a short-term QA upload of 1.7.3 to Debian Unstable with what is currently in the master branch if the TODO in debian/changelog has so

Bug#810536: RFS: roxterm/3.3.2-1

2016-01-09 Thread Tony Houghton
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the latest version of my package "roxterm" * Package name: roxterm Version : 3.3.2-1 Upstream Author : Tony Houghton * URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net * License

Bug#810529: RFS: moc/1:2.6.0~svn-r2788-1

2016-01-09 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
control: owner -1 ! control: tag -1 moreinfo On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 04:07:20PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "moc" as my main sponsor and > uploader > isn't available at the moment. yeah, sure :) > Alternatively, one can download the package with

Re: Bug#806572: RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA]

2016-01-09 Thread Robert James Clay
Hi Tobias! On Thursday, January 07, 2016 05:54:29 AM Tobias Frost wrote: > On Tue, 05 Jan 2016 18:08:55 -0500 Robert James Clay > wrote: > > On Tuesday, January 05, 2016 04:27:48 AM Tobias Frost wrote: > > > - Is the patch forwarded to upstream? > > > >The non vendor specific parts of it,

Bug#810529: RFS: moc/1:2.6.0~svn-r2788-1

2016-01-09 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "moc" as my main sponsor and uploader isn't available at the moment. Package name: moc Version : 1:2.6.0~svn-r2788-1 Upstream Author : mocma...@daper.net URL : http://mo

Re: Bug#801253: O: wicd -- wired and wireless network manager

2016-01-09 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi, short note to all those people in the Cc: On the next iteration, I'll drop all Cc except debian-mentors@lists.debian.org and the bug-report itself. Feel free to object, to subscribe to the bug report or to debian-mentors. :-) toogley wrote: > - my github repo contains all branches the debian

Bug#809727: RFS: hwb/1:040412-7

2016-01-09 Thread Jakub Wilk
On Thursday, January 07, 2016 05:32:49 PM Mattia Rizzolo wrote: To upload a non-free package, and get it built by the autobuilders you need 'XS-Autobuild: yes' and according to DevRef § 5.10.5 also to mail somebody (dunno for what). So that the package can be (manually) whitelisted. * Robert

Bug#810361: marked as done (RFS: mpfrc++/3.6.3+ds-1 [new version] -- multi-precision floating point number class for C++)

2016-01-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 9 Jan 2016 14:38:05 + with message-id <20160109143805.ga31...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#810361: RFS: mpfrc++/3.6.3+ds-1 [new version] -- multi-precision floating point number class for C++ has caused the Debian Bug report #810361, regarding RFS: mpfrc+

Re: O: wicd -- wired and wireless network manager

2016-01-09 Thread toogley
Hey, - my github repo contains all branches the debian git repo has. - when i build from the stable branch, files cointaining the name "squeeze" are created - so i guess, it's a squeeze build. But https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=wicd shows different versions of wicd also for debian

Bug#809727: RFS: hwb/1:040412-7

2016-01-09 Thread Robert James Clay
On Thursday, January 07, 2016 05:32:49 PM Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 03:45:17PM -0500, Robert James Clay wrote: > To upload a non-free package, and get it built by the autobuilders you > need 'XS-Autobuild: yes' and according to DevRef § 5.10.5 also to mail > somebody (dunno

Bug#796030: RFS: tablesnap/0.7.2-1 [ITP] -- Backup utility for the Cassandra database

2016-01-09 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Jeremy > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tablesnap" > the package has been removed from mentors, are you still interested? cheers, G. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWkOCMAAoJEPNPCXROn13ZJt0QAKnMOk7Pak

Re: Re: mentor wanted

2016-01-09 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, >I know...I looked over this mailing list and almost every message starts with >"Bug #". >Going back to the Debian Developer's Reference, it says if someone wants a >mentor >to help via email, they should ask here. I need advice, but on a broader array >of >issues than just one bug. > >Ex