-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
dput ftp-master compute_0.4-3_amd64.changes
[...]
Successfully uploaded packages.
source only uploads don't work when going in *new queue :)
(reuploaded)
cheers,
G.
On Mon, 7 Dec 2015 00:30:03 + Mattia Rizzolo
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2015
Hi,
>The best way would be to build the common header
>package as arch package (arch for d/rules but indep for d/control) : is there
>a simple to do so ?
>
what about overriding the dh_install and dh_install-indep targets?
cheers,
G.
Hi, quick question:
>> Why do you depend on lua-filesystem and lua-lpeg explicitly? If those
>> dependencies are really required, the ${shlibs:Depends} substvar should
>> include them already. Otherwise the build system should be updated to
>> require and incorporate those libraries.
>
>Because t
yes, I didn't miss it, but there are too many RFS open, and I was in VAC.
I'll be back when I have the time for this package :)
(hopefully soon)
cheers,
G.
Il Lunedì 7 Dicembre 2015 7:05, Paul Wise ha scritto:
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> * Gianfranco Costamagna
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> * Gianfranco Costamagna [2015-11-18 17:37:28+]
>> Hi, sure
>> thanks!
>
> Can you please git-clone
>
> git://anonscm.debian.org/users/kaction-guest/complexity.git
> git://anonscm.debian.org/users/kaction-guest/complexity-doc.git
>
> Both
* Gianfranco Costamagna [2015-11-18
17:37:28+]
> Hi, sure
> thanks!
Can you please git-clone
git://anonscm.debian.org/users/kaction-guest/complexity.git
git://anonscm.debian.org/users/kaction-guest/complexity-doc.git
Both contains only debian/ and seems that `origtargz -u && sbuild`
should
Your message dated Mon, 07 Dec 2015 04:27:33 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: isomd5sum/1:1.1.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #807083,
regarding RFS: isomd5sum/1:1.1.0-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
Dear Mentores:
I am currently hardening the arch/indep build scheme of some of my packages.
For most of them, there are common headers that are placed into a indep
packages.
When the autotool chain is not that complex (and well written), it is easy to
manage.
Nevertheless, for one of my package,
HI Mattia, thanks for the reivew.
On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> control: tag -1 + moreinfo
>
> Hi!
>
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:47:21PM -0500, Tong Sun wrote:
> > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dbab/dbab_1.3.1-1.dsc
> >
> > Changes since last version:
>
Your message dated Mon, 7 Dec 2015 00:30:03 +
with message-id <20151207003003.ga29...@chase.mapreri.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#806950: RFS: compute/0.4-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #806950,
regarding RFS: compute/0.4-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Le dimanche 6 décembre 2015 21:28:35, vous avez écrit :
> I saw that they provided a desktop file within the DebianPackager
> directory. desktop files should definitely be provided with the upstream
> sources because they are not Debian specific. Other distributions would
> also benefit from this c
Am 06.12.2015 um 21:13 schrieb Alexandre Detiste:
> Le dimanche 6 décembre 2015, 20:34:42 Markus Koschany a écrit :
[...]
>> You build-depend on wx2.8-headers but this package is obsolete and will
>> be removed soon. Please either use wx3.0-headers instead or remove the
>> build-dependency because
Le dimanche 6 décembre 2015, 20:34:42 Markus Koschany a écrit :
> Hi Alexandre,
>
> here is my initial review. I am working with the pkg-games Git
> repository of corsix-th and I suggest we continue to use it instead of
> the mentors.debian.net packages.
Ok
> debian/control:
>
> You build-depen
Dear Common Lisp team,
dear mentors,
as it's my first time, I wonder whether I have made a mistake while
uploading the new version:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/cl-asdf
Should I change something?
Thank you
Kambiz
On 2015-11-23 21:43 CET, Kambiz Darabi wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I have
Control: owner -1 !
Am 05.12.2015 um 11:55 schrieb Alexandre Detiste:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "corsix-th":
Hi Alexandre,
here is my initial review. I am working with the pkg-games Git
repository of
control: tag -1 + moreinfo
Hi!
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:47:21PM -0500, Tong Sun wrote:
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dbab/dbab_1.3.1-1.dsc
>
> Changes since last version:
>
> * New upstream release (1.3.1).
> - [!] make the pixelserv more robust
> - [!] fix dbab.
On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 06:42:16AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> I would like to see an answer to Jonas on the RC bug you are trying to fix,
> do you want to move in a team maintained fashion your package?
It's also funny, since the git repository is in the Javascript team
space.
--
rega
Your message dated Sun, 6 Dec 2015 16:16:47 +
with message-id <20151206161647.ga24...@chase.mapreri.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#805855: RFS: augeas/1.2.0-0.3 [NMU]
has caused the Debian Bug report #805855,
regarding RFS: augeas/1.2.0-0.3 [NMU]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 09:31:39AM -0500, Andrew Siplas wrote:
> I've run into a fatal bug (#779520) and have created a patch as I work
> to get in touch with the upstream developers (if any); this package
> contains code from what seems to be a legacy repository and already some
> other patches ar
control: owner -1 !
control: tag -1 + moreinfo
Hi!
First, please be a bit more patiente with your pings; following up only
5 days later is very much not helpful.
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 03:10:28PM -0500, Jacob Adams wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "9wm"
>
> * Package name
Your message dated Sun, 6 Dec 2015 13:20:34 +
with message-id <20151206132034.ga10...@chase.mapreri.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#775886: RFS: objeck-lang-amd64/3.3.5-2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #775886,
regarding RFS: objeck-lang-amd64/3.3.5-2-1
to be marked as done.
This means that
Hi,
Dominique Dumont wrote:
> Hmm, you don't detail how you make a change to upstream files.
By editing texts with vim or by copying files from my workstation
into the libisoburn-1.4.2 tree of my Sid VM.
At occasion of release 1.4.0 i afterwards naively applied "debuild -S",
which told me to run
Dear Common Lisp team,
dear mentors,
as it's my first time, I wonder whether I have made a mistake while
uploading the new version:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/cl-asdf
Should I change something?
Thank you
Kambiz
On 2015-11-23 21:43 CET, Kambiz Darabi wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I have
On Monday 30 November 2015 18:33:22 Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> All is well as long as i have no debian/patches. I can build
> and install the .deb files (debuild -S, debuild -b, dpkg -i).
>
> But if i make changes to the upstream files and run
> debclean
> dpkg-source --commit
> then afterwards
24 matches
Mail list logo
