Bug#804506: RFS: attic 0.16-1

2015-11-10 Thread Caitlin Matos
Hi Gianfranco, I have changed the priority from extra to optional. I am using devscripts 2.15.9. In any case, I have already changed the watch file to what you recommended. Thank you for your help! Caitlin On 10/11/15 04:10 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: Hi Caitlin, I have changed th

Bug#804715: marked as done (RFS: sfcgal/1.2.1)

2015-11-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 Nov 2015 22:12:34 +0100 with message-id <56425dc2.6020...@xs4all.nl> and subject line Re: Bug#804715: RFS: sfcgal/1.2.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #804715, regarding RFS: sfcgal/1.2.1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w

Bug#804715: RFS: sfcgal/1.2.1

2015-11-10 Thread Sven Geggus
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Hello, I have just uploaded a new version of the library package sfcgal which fixes bug #804589 * Package name: sfcgal Version : 1.2.1-1~exp1 Upstream Author : Mickael Borne (IGN), Hugo Mercier (Oslandia), Vincent Mora (Oslandia),

Bug#804697: RFS: libsass-python/0.9.1-1 [ITP] -- libsass-python -- SASS for Python

2015-11-10 Thread Frederic Bonnard
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libsass-python" Package name: libsass-python Version : 0.9.1-1 Upstream Author : Hong Minhee URL : http://hongminhee.org/libsass-python License : MIT Sect

Bug#804100: RFS: rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar/0.14.0-1~debian [ITP]

2015-11-10 Thread foss.freedom
Hi Gianfranco, quick question - I received what looks like some sort of automated emails - not sure what these mean - do I need to-do anything? thanks in advance. "> block 804192 by 804100 Bug #804192 [wnpp] ITP: rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar -- Replace the Rhythmbox large toolbar with

Re: Bug#804283: RFS: igb/5.3.3.2-1 [ITP] -- out of tree Intel Gigabit Ethernet driver.

2015-11-10 Thread Clement Hermann
Le 08/11/2015 03:56, Paul Wise a écrit : > On Sat, 2015-11-07 at 08:12 +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote: > >> Intel also maintains the drivers for their wired cards in >> mainline. However, for some reason (unknown for me), they have always >> restricted the features of those drivers. > Has anyone sugge

Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]

2015-11-10 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi Grigori, the RFS is already fine and you are just missing the ITP. ITP means "I want to package this foo for Debian" and you close it in your changelog RFS (this bug #799268) means: I want to find a sponsor, because I'm not able to directly upload on Debian. this RFS is closed by your sponsor

Bug#804506: RFS: attic 0.16-1

2015-11-10 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi Caitlin, >I have changed the watch file to the one you recommended, which does >work. However, the previous one was also working. strange: cat debian/watch version=3 opts="pgpsigurlmangle=s/$/.asc/" \ https://pypi.python.org/simple/attic/ ../../packages/source/A/Attic/Attic-(.*).tar.gz#md5

Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]

2015-11-10 Thread Grigori Fursin
Hi Lucas, Do you mean that I should open a separate ticket (RFS)? Or since the package now seems to be okeish, should I just continue searching for a sponsor? Thanks, Grigori -Original Message- From: Lucas Nussbaum Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2015 9:38 AM To: Grigori Fursin Cc: Gian

Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]

2015-11-10 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 07/11/15 at 16:21 +0100, Grigori Fursin wrote: > Hi Gianfranco, > > After hacking various guides I managed to update python-ck > based on what you mentioned: > > >https://mentors.debian.net/package/python3-ck > >this is a nack for me. > > > >You can build two binaries with the same source pack