Bug#801490: marked as done (RFS: knopflerfish-osgi/5.1.0+dfsg1-3)

2015-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 12 Oct 2015 04:29:52 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: knopflerfish-osgi/5.1.0+dfsg1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #801490, regarding RFS: knopflerfish-osgi/5.1.0+dfsg1-3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#792144: RFS: cunit/2.1-2.dfsg-3 -- Unit Testing Library for C [ITA]

2015-10-11 Thread Azat Khuzhin
On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 02:17:29PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi Azat, > > > > >No problem, replaced version in d/changelog and d/NEWS to > >"2.1-3+dfsg-1". > > > wonderful > >Done using d/copyright, thanks. > > > this is not really correct. > > I see you remove Makefiles in copy

Re: dev-pkg-without-shlib-symlink lintian warning for libtool library using -release & -version-info

2015-10-11 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 11-10-15 22:22, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Sebastiaan Couwenberg , 2015-10-08, 21:01: >> To deal with the external usage of liblwgeom built from the postgis >> sources, the upstream developers now use the -release libtool option >> along with -version-info to better support installation of multiple >

Bug#799205: RFS: eviacam/2.0.1-5 [ITP] -- webcam based mouse emulator

2015-10-11 Thread Cesar Mauri
Hi, Thanks both for your feedback. First, if I try to build using debuild, I get the error `dh_autoreconf: autoreconf -f -i returned exit code 1'. I think it is because dh_autoreconf is running "naked" `autoreconf' instead of `autogen.sh'. So I think the fix is to add the following entry into d

Re: dev-pkg-without-shlib-symlink lintian warning for libtool library using -release & -version-info

2015-10-11 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Sebastiaan Couwenberg , 2015-10-08, 21:01: To deal with the external usage of liblwgeom built from the postgis sources, the upstream developers now use the -release libtool option along with -version-info to better support installation of multiple postgis versions. The -release option was a

Bug#790104: Fwd: Bug#790104: RFS: lightdm-gtk-greeter-settings/1.2.0-1 [ITP]

2015-10-11 Thread James Lu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 (This was supposed to go to the maintainers for lightdm-gtk-greeter in Debian, not the upstream list; sorry for the noise.) Hi everyone, Recently I've been trying to get lightdm-gtk-greeter-settings into Debian, since it's a nifty utility! Right

Bug#790104: RFS: lightdm-gtk-greeter-settings/1.2.0-1 [ITP]

2015-10-11 Thread James Lu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 11/10/2015 2:37 AM, Christian Kastner wrote: > On 2015-10-11 07:54, James Lu wrote: >>> d/copyright: >>> - The license appears to be GPL-3, not GPL-3+ (at least in the handful >>>of files I checked). This also requires correction of the fre

Bug#801213: RFS: python-privacyidea/2.7-1 [ITP]

2015-10-11 Thread Alex Vong
Hi Cornelius, I recommend reading if you haven't. The guide mentions suggestions 1), 2) and 3) mentioned by Daniel and more. Cheers, Alex On 11/10/2015, Cornelius Kölbel wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > thanks a lot for all the valuable feedback.

Bug#790104: RFS: lightdm-gtk-greeter-settings/1.2.0-1 [ITP]

2015-10-11 Thread Christian Kastner
On 2015-10-11 07:54, James Lu wrote: >> d/copyright: >> - The license appears to be GPL-3, not GPL-3+ (at least in the handful >>of files I checked). This also requires correction of the free- >>standing license block (the last paragraph) > > I see. Ubuntu's packaging wrote the license as

Bug#801213: RFS: python-privacyidea/2.7-1 [ITP]

2015-10-11 Thread Daniel Stender
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 11.10.2015 10:52, Cornelius Kölbel wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > thanks a lot for all the valuable feedback. > > I will dive into it later. > > Do you have any further recommendations on finding a sponser (after > streamlining the package)? > > THan

Bug#801213: RFS: python-privacyidea/2.7-1 [ITP]

2015-10-11 Thread Cornelius Kölbel
Hi Daniel, thanks a lot for all the valuable feedback. I will dive into it later. Do you have any further recommendations on finding a sponser (after streamlining the package)? THanks a lot and kind regards Cornelius Am Sonntag, den 11.10.2015, 00:18 +0200 schrieb Daniel Stender: > Hi Corneliu

Bug#801490: RFS: knopflerfish-osgi/5.1.0+dfsg1-3

2015-10-11 Thread Felix Natter
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors/debian-java, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "knopflerfish-osgi" * Package name: knopflerfish-osgi Version : 5.1.0+dfsg1-3 Upstream Author : Makewave * URL : http://www.knopflerfish.org/ * License