Bug#800140: RFS: traitlets -- Lightweight Traits-like package

2015-09-27 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, Thanks for fixing the watch file, however there is still an issue there: "Depends: python:any (<< 2.8), python:any (>= 2.7.5-5~)" (runtime dependencies) I see in setup.py install_requires = setuptools_args['install_requires'] = [ 'ipython_genutils', 'decorator', ] so for some reasons py

Bug#800140: RFS: traitlets -- Lightweight Traits-like package

2015-09-27 Thread Julien Puydt
Hi, Le 27/09/2015 20:19, Gianfranco Costamagna a écrit : the packaging looks good, however I would appreciate if you could take the watch file from here http://pypi.debian.net/traitlets/watch and maybe fix it to avoid dev0 to show up as a newer version. Unfortunately I don't know how to uversi

Bug#799205: RFS: eviacam/2.0.1-1 [ITP] -- webcam based mouse emulator

2015-09-27 Thread Alex Vong
Hi everyone, About the `hardening-no-fortify-functions' lintian warning, I use the `debian/rule' template generated by dh_make and merges it with the original `debian/rule' file. Now the warning goes away with the new `debian/rule' file, which is in the attachment. Please try to see if it works!

Bug#792144: RFS: cunit/2.1-2.dfsg-3 -- Unit Testing Library for C [ITA]

2015-09-27 Thread Azat Khuzhin
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 10:38:27AM +0200, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi, > > sorry for the long wait! Hi, no problem! > I did a deep review, and I guess I found the last "showstoppers" > > 1) Upstream revision seems to be "2.1-3" and you seem to have > introduced a first dfsg revision > so

Bug#788653: RFS: ktap/0.4-1 [ITP] -- lightweight script-based dynamic tracing tool for Linux

2015-09-27 Thread Azat Khuzhin
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 06:27:49PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi, > > > first a question: does the user need to do modprobe ktapvm manually? > > > > well, can't the ktap tool do the job automagically? > > and moreover, how do the user know that a ktap source has a ktapvm kernel > m

Bug#800319: RFS: arrayfire/3.1.2+dfsg1-1

2015-09-27 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "arrayfire" * Package name: arrayfire Version : 3.1.2+dfsg1-1 Upstream Author : ArrayFire Development Group * URL : http://arrayfire.com/ * License : BSD

Bug#788653: RFS: ktap/0.4-1 [ITP] -- lightweight script-based dynamic tracing tool for Linux

2015-09-27 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, > first a question: does the user need to do modprobe ktapvm manually? well, can't the ktap tool do the job automagically? and moreover, how do the user know that a ktap source has a ktapvm kernel module? I mean, I would expect a kernel module called "ktap" and maybe a readme explaini

Bug#800140: RFS: traitlets -- Lightweight Traits-like package

2015-09-27 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Control: owner -1 ! Hi Julien, the packaging looks good, however I would appreciate if you could take the watch file from here http://pypi.debian.net/traitlets/watch and maybe fix it to avoid dev0 to show up as a newer version. Unfortunately I don't know how to uversionmangle it :) cheers, G

Bug#788653: RFS: ktap/0.4-1 [ITP] -- lightweight script-based dynamic tracing tool for Linux

2015-09-27 Thread Azat Khuzhin
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 03:49:00PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi, last nitpick/issues: > > first a question: does the user need to do modprobe ktapvm manually? Hi, Right now - yes. > 2) the tarball is not the same as the upstream one. > > Please consider packaging a snapshot > ktap_

Bug#800145: marked as done (RFS: testpath/0.2-1 [ITP] -- Collection of utilities for Python code working with files and commands)

2015-09-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 27 Sep 2015 18:08:06 + (UTC) with message-id <1058073162.2221574.1443377286164.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#800145: RFS: testpath -- Collection of utilities for Python code working with files and commands has caused the Debian Bug report #8001

Bug#798990: RFS: webdeploy/1.0-1 ITP #798716 -- deploy files via FTP

2015-09-27 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Control: owner -1 ! Hi Daniel, > I'm not sure what's wrong here, the upstream makefile contains this > install rule which installs the script and the man page, have I > done something wrong?: install: all > > install webdeploy $(DESTDIR)$(bindir)

Re: Endianess testing?

2015-09-27 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 02:39:59PM +0200, Paul Wise wrote: > > how do I test the endianess of a system for the inclusion in > > debian/rules? > > In what context is this nessecary? I would expect whatever it is that > is needs this should be doing what it is doing in another way. I guess <877fndeg

Re: Endianess testing?

2015-09-27 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Ole Streicher wrote: > how do I test the endianess of a system for the inclusion in > debian/rules? In what context is this nessecary? I would expect whatever it is that is needs this should be doing what it is doing in another way. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.de

Bug#800145: RFS: testpath -- Collection of utilities for Python code working with files and commands

2015-09-27 Thread Julien Puydt
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Hi, I finished packaging testpath, whose ITP is #799599, and would now need a sponsor : * Package name: testpath Version : 0.2 Upstream Author : Jupyter Development Team * URL : https://github.com/jupyter/testpath *

Bug#800140: RFS: traitlets -- Lightweight Traits-like package

2015-09-27 Thread Julien Puydt
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Hi, I'm looking for a sponsor for the package: * Package name: traitlets Version : 4.0.0 Upstream Author : IPython Development Team * URL : https://github.com/ipython/traitlets * License : BSD-3-clause Progra

Bug#792144: RFS: cunit/2.1-2.dfsg-3 -- Unit Testing Library for C [ITA]

2015-09-27 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, sorry for the long wait! I did a deep review, and I guess I found the last "showstoppers" 1) Upstream revision seems to be "2.1-3" and you seem to have introduced a first dfsg revision so it becomes 2.1-3+dfsg and then the debian revision,