On Sun, 06 Sep 2015, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> > Maybe it should instead drop the long name, and return the ISOFS name,
> > instead.
>
> This might reduce the probability of a name collision,
> but can still collide with some short Rock Ridge name.
Any name we return can colide, unless we return so
On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 05:50:46PM +0300, a3at.m...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 01:14:45PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > quick review:
> >
> > 1) lintian is complaining about no compat level set.
> > I don't see any problem in the compat level set, not sure
>
Hi all,
I just updated package on mentors.debian.org.
Changes from last upload:
* patches for build system merged to upstream by upstream author
* dep5 for copyright
* git repo at collab-maint
Could somebody take a look?
Thanks!
Nico Schlömer writes:
> i.e., libraries with some number appended. What's the meaning of that
> number?
Hello Nico!
Those packages are shared libraries, and the number represents the
SOVERSION. Whenever the ABI of the shared library changes, the new
version should be in a binary package that ha
* Nico Schlömer , 2015-09-07, 20:46:
In Debian, I find packages such as
```
libzeep3.0
libzdb9
libzim0
```
i.e., libraries with some number appended. What's the meaning of that
number?
This is explained in Policy §8.1:
Normally, the run-time shared library and its ‘SONAME’ symlink should be
Hi,
i built my first kernel the Debian way and filed
a kernel bug. To Debian for now:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=798300
I decided not to mention ISO producer programs by "affects".
They work fine with the kernel.
How long should i wait before trying at upstream ?
(Urge
Hi everyone,
In Debian, I find packages such as
```
libzeep3.0
libzdb9
libzim0
```
i.e., libraries with some number appended. What's the meaning of that
number?
Cheers,
Nico
On 09/07/2015 06:35 PM, Ross Gammon wrote:
> Whoops - I should have checked that. That is the trouble with using
> templates. I have submitted a bug against npm2deb, and a pull request to
> fix this. Hopefully that will mean less mistakes from everyone in the
> future:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi
On 09/07/2015 03:15 PM, roucaries bastien wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna
> wrote:
>> Control: owner -1 !
>> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>>
>> Hi Ross,
>> 1) control: "priority: extra"
>>
>> as said before on debian-mentors the priority should be optional, unless you
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Craig Small wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 11:21:35AM +0300, Azat Khuzhin wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 11:33:32AM +1000, Riley Baird wrote:
>> > d/copyright:
>> > -In the LGPL license text, you've accidentally referred to the wrong
>> > license:
>> > You sho
On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 01:14:45PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi,
>
> quick review:
>
> 1) lintian is complaining about no compat level set.
> I don't see any problem in the compat level set, not sure
> if a bug in lintian or something else...
>
> 2) d/rules: please use the new dh for
On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 01:14:45PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi,
>
> quick review:
>
> 1) lintian is complaining about no compat level set.
> I don't see any problem in the compat level set, not sure
> if a bug in lintian or something else...
> 2) d/rules: please use the new dh forma
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
> Control: owner -1 !
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> Hi Ross,
> 1) control: "priority: extra"
>
> as said before on debian-mentors the priority should be optional, unless you
> have good reason to
> have extra
> https://www.debian.org/
Hi,
quick review:
1) lintian is complaining about no compat level set.
I don't see any problem in the compat level set, not sure
if a bug in lintian or something else...
2) d/rules: please use the new dh format, it should be trivial to convert.
3) d/control: do you really need autoconf as b-d?
Control: owner -1 !
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Ross,
1) control: "priority: extra"
as said before on debian-mentors the priority should be optional, unless you
have good reason to
have extra
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-priorities
2) "In order to run the tests pr
Control: owner -1 !
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
Hi Bastien
review:
1) "As an extra tip, don't use 'extra' as 'priority' (d/control) if your
package doesn't conflict with other[1]. I suggest 'optional'.
[1] https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-priorities";
this still appli
On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 11:21:35AM +0300, Azat Khuzhin wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 11:33:32AM +1000, Riley Baird wrote:
> > d/copyright:
> > -In the LGPL license text, you've accidentally referred to the wrong
> > license:
> > You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
Changes since the last upload:
* New maintainer. (Closes: #763096).
* Fix pkg-config file is broken (Closes: #782366).
* Bump Standards version to 3.9.6
* Bump debhelper to version 9
* Migrate to git
* copyright: link to [L]GPL-2 instead of versionless [L]GPL
* copyright: migrate to DEP-5 (machin
Hi,
>2) Tried to set myself as owner, but I'm unsure if that was correct - I
>guess not. bugs.debian.org is a bit tricky imho.
(it should be fixed now, right?)
>5) I did apply for membership something like a week ago, but nothing
>hapenned yet. But I really think working together with the pkg
On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 11:33:32AM +1000, Riley Baird wrote:
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cunit"
>
> Hi!
>
> I'm not a DD, so I can't sponsor your package, but I had a look, and
> here are some notes:
Hi,
Thanks for you comments, by some reason I didn't see your email when you
20 matches
Mail list logo
