Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sndio"
* Package name: sndio
Version : 0.0.10-1
Upstream Author : Alexandre Ratchov
* URL : http://www.sndio.org/
* License : ISC
Section : so
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 09:31:14PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
>
> I wanted to know if uscan can handle pandoc, so I just fixed it:
> http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/devscripts.git/commit/?id=13f5c48414547b627501d782aa502d3b916bb0b7
Very appreciated.
Thanks a lot
Andreas.
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 09.08.2015, 14:33 +0200 schrieb Felix Natter:
> I don't mind fixing this (in the next few days), but also see no problem
> in filing a tag=newcomer bug against devscripts ("[mk-origtargz]") for
> fixing in debconf, mentioning the workaround.
> (This is a pretty bad bug, but it'
Dear Mentors!
CMake offers a configuration flag BUILD_SHARED_LIBS [1], which can be
passed to cmake via override_dh_auto_configure.
This forces cmake to build a shared library. However, for the *-dev
package I would like to also build the static version of it. Which would
mean to invoke dh_auto_c
Your message dated Tue, 11 Aug 2015 16:24:53 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: coq-highschoolgeometry/8.4+20150620-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #792757,
regarding RFS: coq-highschoolgeometry/8.4+20150620-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Your message dated Tue, 11 Aug 2015 16:24:53 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: gbutils/5.6.6-1 -- utilities for command line
econometrics [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #788844,
regarding RFS: gbutils/5.6.6-1 -- utilities for command line econometrics [ITP]
to be marked
Your message dated Tue, 11 Aug 2015 18:40:59 +0200
with message-id <55ca259b.5090...@xs4all.nl>
and subject line RFS: python-click-plugins/1.0-1 [ITP] [uploaded]
has caused the Debian Bug report #795191,
regarding RFS: python-click-plugins/1.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Control: owner -1 !
Hi Johan,
the package looks good.
Some nitpicks,
1) please do not usee the © symbol in debian copyright(I remember there were
issues with machine readable format and that symbol)
2) licensecheck says:
click_plugins/__init__.py: BSD (2 clause)
but seems that it is actual
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-grass-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-click-plugins"
Package name: python-click-plugins
Version : 1.0-1
Upstream Author : Kevin D. Wurster
URL
Alex Vong wrote:
> Maybe overriding CFLAGS and CPPFLAGS but not LDFLAGS will solve FTBFS.
>
> For example in debian/rules,
>
> CFLAGS = '-Ofoo'
> CPPFLAGS = '-Dfoo'
> LDFLAGS += '-lfoo'
>
> override_dh_auto_configure:
> dh_auto_configure -- --enable-foo
This is wrong. You should *not* ove
Yes, this is true.
The problem is that the FTBFS is due to security flags, so it might be good
to solve it anyway.
However, commenting out LDFLAGS from Makefile.in should solve the issue.
BTW that "-s" on the LDFLAGS shouldn't be there, it was a packaging problem
fixed -6 upload and reintroduced
Okay, confirmed, solved the hardening-no-relro,
and Now I can see I make a mistake on subject,
It was to be hardening-no-relro and hardening-no-fortify-functions.
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 11:50 AM, lucas castro
wrote:
> I'll do that, and send to mentors.
>
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Gian
I'll do that, and send to mentors.
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna <
costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it> wrote:
> Yes, this is true.
>
> The problem is that the FTBFS is due to security flags, so it might be good
> to solve it anyway.
>
> However, commenting out LDFLAGS from Ma
Hi Lucas,
I am new in packaging. `hardening-no-relro' also happens to me. It
turns out it is caused by the missing `-Wl,-z,relro' LDFLAGS. Maybe
overriding CFLAGS and CPPFLAGS but not LDFLAGS will solve FTBFS.
For example in debian/rules,
CFLAGS = '-Ofoo'
CPPFLAGS = '-Dfoo'
LDFLAGS += '-lfoo'
o
Hi again,
>8) debian/control
> - please bump std-version to 3.9.6
> - please remove the conflicts
>(<< ${binary:Version})
and please remove yourself from uploaders, you are already maintainer :)
cheers,
G.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a su
Hi
>My name is Razvan Crainea[1] and I am one of the Core developers of the
>OpenSIPS project, a Voice-over-IP SIP server. We would like our project
>to be added to the official Debian repository and we need a mentor to
>help us achieve this.
>We already have some DEB packages for OpenSIPS th
Hello all!
My name is Razvan Crainea[1] and I am one of the Core developers of the
OpenSIPS project, a Voice-over-IP SIP server. We would like our project
to be added to the official Debian repository and we need a mentor to
help us achieve this.
We already have some DEB packages for OpenSIPS
Hi Lucas
(sorry for not answering on irc, I was AFK)
hardening-check debian/xmbmon/usr/bin/xmbmon
d/rules:
override_dh_auto_build:
$(MAKE) CFLAGS="$(CFLAGS)" CPPFLAGS="$(CPPFLAGS)" CXXFLAGS="$(CXXFLAGS)"
LDFLAGS="$(LDFLAGS)"
something like this seems to make autoconf aware of the flags (not
Gianfranco,
No problem about about that on irc.
I think I should take a time on another package, then mailed here.
and if anyone know about this, it's fine. I really spent much time on this
package,
and learned a lot with it.
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna <
costamagnagianf
I'm getting harderning issue on packaging xmbmon.
I already looked at https://wiki.debian.org/Hardening, but no success.
I uploaded the source to mentors[1], and the attachment is the build log.
[1] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xmbmon/xmbmon_2.05-8.dsc
--
contatos:
Celular: ( 99
20 matches
Mail list logo
